Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON ______________________________________________ ANDREA Y. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, Shelby Circuit No. 127514 R.D. Vs. C.A. No. 02A01-9608-CH-00194 CLINISSON A. JOHNSON, FILED Defendant-Appellant.

FILED May 28, 2025 07:36 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas JUDGMENT Andrea Dwaynd Johnson, Appellant Appeal from the 196th District Court of Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 32304CR). No. 06-18-00211-CR v. Opinion delivered by Justice Stevens, Chief Jus

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-18-00211-CR ANDREA DWAYND JOHNSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 196th District Court Hunt County, Texas Trial Court No. 32304CR Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Stevens

DENY in Part, DISMISS in Part, and Opinion Filed August 7, 2017. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00689-CV IN RE ANDREA VENIOR JOHNSON, Relator Original Proceeding from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ANDREA P. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. JENNIFER CONSTANTIN, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Last Will and Testament of Sophia S. Johnson, dated August 16, 2010, ALEXANDER L. CONSTANTIN, ANDREW G. CONSTANTIN, MICHAEL A. JOHNSON and JUSTINE S. JOHNSON,

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-12-00480-CR ANDREA L. JOHNSON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 278th District Court Madison County, Texas Trial Court No. 11,663

VandeWalle, Chief Justice. [¶ 1] Matthew Johnson appealed a district court’s order awarding two of the three tax exemptions for the children to Tina Johnson. Matthew Johnson argues the district court erred by not holding an oral argument and failing to make explicit findings on who would benefit the most from having the tax exemptions. Matthew Johnson did not request an oral argum

JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge Plaintiff Andrea Johnson is a former employee of Defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, which, she charitably alleges, operates the "always dependable transit service in the Washington metropolitan area." Amend. Compl., ¶ 4. Her suit, however, does not depend on the punctuality of Metro; it instead alleges that WMATA unlawfully discriminated against her on the basis

Philip M. Hess, Judge Introduction This is an appeal from a judgment entered by the trial court granting the motion for contempt filed by Andrea Story (Plaintiff) against her former spouse, George Story (Defendant), for' his failure to comply with the terms of the parties’ marital settlement agreement relating to

Spain, J. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Coccoma, J.), rendered December 19, 2011 in Schenectady County, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of attempted assault in the first degree (two counts) and attempted gang assault in the first degree. On March 30, 2010, Latoya King (hereinafter the victim) was walking alone on a street near her home in the City of Schenectady, Schenectady C

Spain, J. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Coccoma, J.), rendered December 19, 2011 in Schenectady County, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of attempted assault in the first degree (two counts) and attempted gang assault in the first degree. On March 30, 2010, Latoya King (hereinafter the victim) was walking alone on a street near her home in the City of Schenectady, Schenectady C

NO. 12-02-00341-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS LEO JOHNSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND§

CANADY, C.J. In these consolidated cases we consider whether challenges to plea agreement provisions concerning credit for time served are cognizable under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Andrea Johnson seeks review of Johnson v. State, 974 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), and Bernard Joyner seeks review of Joyner v. State, 988 So.2d 670 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). In each case, the Third District Cour

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. COHEN, C.J., EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

BETH BLOOM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff American Civil Rights Union's ("Plaintiff" or "ACRU") Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Count II of the First Amended Complaint, ECF No. [117] ("ACRU's Motion"), Defendant Brenda Snipes' ("Defendant" or "Snipes") Motion for Summary Judgment as to Count II of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, ECF No. [145] ("Snipes' Motio

—In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for breach of contract, the defendant appeals, as limited by its notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), dated January 28, 1993, as granted the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment with regard to the first and fourth causes of action. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge. |T The distribution of the parties’ property is at issue in this divorce case. Appellant James Johnson challenges the trial court’s award to appellee Norma Johnson of interests in the value of improvements to appellant’s nonmarital real property, some rental income, the proceeds of the sale of a business, an IRA, a 401(k) plan, and certain funds removed from a joint account. We

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. Grim. P. 3.704(d)(14) (expressly providing that “pri- or record” on criminal punishment code scoresheet includes convictions for offenses committed by the offender as a juvenile); Mendoza-Magadan v. State, 217 So.3d 112, 113 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (rejecting defendant’s argument that his prior juvenile dispositions rendered without a jury trial should not be included on

BAUER, Circuit Judge. Defendant Ronald Johnson entered a conditional guilty plea to one count of possession of heroin with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), reserving the right to appeal the denials of his motions to suppress the evidence found in his condominium. Johnson now challenges those denials. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND A. Search Warrant Affidavit O