Cases

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

¶1 Agid, J. —A jury convicted Jeremy King of one count of first degree child molestation and one count of first degree child rape. During the trial, King moved for a mistrial after a Child Protective Services (CPS) investigator referred to his status as a registered sex offender in *791violation of the trial court’s order in limine excluding all r

ORDER CLAY D. LAND, District Judge. Defendant Thomas J. Tidwell (“Tidwell”) filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint against him (ECF No. 25). Tidwell argues that Plaintiff has not alleged his claims with sufficient specificity and that the present allegations fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. At this stage of the litigation, the Court must accept Plaintiffs factual

130 P.3d 376 (2006) 131 Wash.App. 789 STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Jeremy Monroe KING, Appellant. No. 55081-1-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. January 23, 2006. Publication Ordered in Part and as Amended March 7, 2006. *377 Oliver Ross Davis, Attorney at Law, Washingto

Matter of Isaac S. (Miriam S.) (2019 NY Slip Op 08849) Matter of Isaac S. (Miriam S.) 2019 NY Slip Op 08849 Decided on December 11, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bu

NO. 12-24-00088-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS PATRICK TYRONE WILLIAMS, § APPEAL FROM THE 420TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS

*621Opinion DUFFY, J. Appellants Jeffrey R. Golin and Elsie Y. Golin (collectively, the Golins) appeal from the dismissal of this action after the trial court determined them to be vexatious litigants under Code of Civil Procedure section 391, subdivision (b)(2) and (3),1 and they failed to post a $500,000 bond to continue th

2020 IL App (2d) 190722 No. 2-19-0722 Opinion filed October 7, 2020 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT JAMIE DZIERWA, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of Du Page County.

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and i

641 F.3d 290 (2011) Leroy SANDERS; Stacy Ashcraft; Julee Pratt; Dorothy Bailey; John Banks; James Bennett; Jason Bottoms; Barbara Bottoms; Randal Brannum; Treva Brannum; Jack Bratton; Marlene Burks; Lisa Burton; William Chaney; Billy Chasteen; Sherry Chasteen; Kenneth Cooperwood; Garrett W. Davis; Lakesha Decker; David Degrandchamp; Debra Ann Dozier; Lenora Driver; Meshell Duffy; Randall Eligh; Marlena R. English; Martez Freeman; Randal Frolos; Twyla Gla

[Cite as State v. Rutherford, 2020-Ohio-1309.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case No. 28486 : v.

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Adams, J.), entered May 5, 1997, as, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, made after a hearing, finding that she had neglected her seven children, granted physical custody of three of the children to the maternal grandmother for a period of 12 months. Ordered that the appeal is di

Opinion issued March 4, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00674-CV ——————————— IN RE EDUARDO DEL PINO, SPRING DEL PINO, ROBERT RUGGLES, GLORIA RUGGLES, ROBERT DAWKINS, DEMETRIA DAWKINS, EDDIE DELANEY, JENNIFER DELANEY, LEROY DELK, CAROLE DELK, MARTI

ORDER AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.’s (“Fresenius”) motion to dismiss Relator Chester Saldivar’s Amended Complaint. [Doc. 42.] Relator has alleged that Defendant has engaged in a fraudulent billing scheme involving medications it received for free from manufacturers and administered to dialysis patients but s

140 Nev., Advance Opinion Lig IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA MELINDA ADKINS, AN INDIVIDUAL; No. 85569 GERALD ED ANDREWS, AN INDIVIDUAL; THE ESTATE OF RICH ROMER, DECEASED, BY PRISCILLA ROMER BARATA, AS PERSONAL FILED REPRESENTATIVE, INDIVIDUALLY

ORDER AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Relator Chester Saldivar’s Third Motion to Amend his Complaint [Doc. 92-1].1 Relator has alleged that Defendant has engaged in a fraudulent billing scheme involving medications it received for free from manufacturers and administered to dialysis patients but for which it sought reimbursement fr

259 B.R. 555 (2001) In re Douglas BERNSTEIN, Debtor. Thomas J. Orr, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Jayne Bernstein, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 00-51884 (SAS). Adversary No. 00-5509 TS. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey. March 13, 2001. Andrea Dobin, Sterns & Weinroth P.C., Trenton, NJ, for Plaintiff. *556 Bunce

Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed May 27, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00095-CV SAN JACINTO RIVER AUTHORITY, Appellant V. ANDY RAY, ET AL., Appellees1 On Appeal from the 125th District Court H

Baker, J. ¶1 Jeffrey McKee was convicted of two counts of first degree rape while armed with a firearm. The trial court, noting that the victims were prostitutes, imposed an exceptional minimum sentence. McKee challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on one of the firearm enhancements and one of the rape convictions, as well as community custody provisions barring him from using pornography or alcohol. The State cross-appeals the

ORDER DAVID S. DOTY, District Judge. This matter is before the court upon defendants’ motions to dismiss and motions for judgment on the pleadings.1 Hennepin County also moves to sever the claims against it. Based on a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, *818and for the following reasons, the court grants