Cases

Opinion issued December 14, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00490-CV ——————————— KJELL AND JENNIFER ANDERSON, Appellant V. ANDR

Belden, Judge. {¶ 1} The plaintiff, Lighting by Design, Inc. (“Lighting”), seeks an order from this court finding the garnishee, North Akron Savings Bank (“NASB”) in contempt for failing to hold garnished funds in a suspense account subject to an order of this court directing payment. NASB argues that it did not disobey any order of this court, but complied with contractual obligations to its borrower. NASB asks this court for s

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2017 Term _____________ FILED October 19, 2017 No. 17-0419 released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY, II CLERK _____________ SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

MEMORANDUM OPINION HONORABLE SARA LIOI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are two dispositive motions. Defendants City of Akron. (“City”) and Jesse Lesser (“Lesser”) (collectively “Akron defendants”) have moved for summary judgment. (Doc, ISTo. 28 [“Akron MSJ”].) Plaintiffs oppose this motion (Doc. No, 60- [“Opp’n Akron MSJ”]), and Akron defendants have filed a reply, (Doc. No. 64 [“Akron Repl

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be Nov 05 2015, 8:40 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES Fronse W. Smith, Jr. Andrew S. Williams Mishawaka, Indiana

The opinion of the court was delivered by LIHOTZ, J.A.D. We examine a young mother’s challenges to a judgment of guardianship terminating her parental rights. Defendant L.J.D. (whom we refer to as “Lela”) was fourteen when her son, A.T.D. (whom we refer to as “Alvin”) was born. At that time, Lela herself was a child, who was placed in the custody and care of plaintiff, the Division of Youth and Family Servic

The opinion of the court was delivered by PARRILLO, J.A.D. In this parental termination case, the Law Guardian for three children appeals from the Family Part’s denial of her request to compel the prospective adoptive parents to continue visitation among the siblings as a function both of the court’s parens patriae power and the children’s constitutional right to associate with their siblings post

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 22-1340 Filed April 26, 2023 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. DENNIS CASSADY, MATTHEW CASSADY, SPOUSE OF MATTHEW CASSADY, IF ANY, UNKNOWN HEIRS OF VALERIE A CASSADY, CREDITORS OF VALERIE A CASSADY, CREDITORS OF VALERIE A CASSADY, THE VILLAS AT ORCHARD HILLS CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, ANDREA REBECCA YODER, JOHN YODER, ANY ALL KNOWN AND UNKNOW

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION OF MANI-TOU AMERICAS, INC. TO REOPEN THE CHAPTER 7 CASE AND DECLARE DEBT NONDIS-CHARGEABLE MELVIN S. HOFFMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. Manitou Americas, Inc., formerly known as Gehl Company, (hereinafter “Gehl”) has moved to reopen this chapter 7 case in order to seek to except from Brian O’Sullivan’s discharge a debt owed to Gehl. The debtors oppose. At issue is whethe

210 F.Supp.2d 1062 (2002) EXTERIOR SYSTEMS, INC. d/b/a Fabwel, Inc., Plaintiff, v. NOBLE COMPOSITES, INC., Larry Farver, Kenneth Farver, and Edward Welter, Defendants. No. 3:01-CV-217 RM. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. June 24, 2002. *1063 *1064 Paul J Peralta

818 A.2d 494 (2003) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant v. Charles H. SMITH, Jr., Appellee. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted December 5, 2002. Decided March 6, 2003. Andrea F. McKenna, D. Michael Fisher, Jerome T. Foerster, William H. Ryan, Rober A. Graci, Harrisburg, for the Com., Appellant. *495 David Russell

989 F.Supp. 375 (1997) Richard DUHAIME; James W. Yoder; Donna M. Yoder; Theodore A. Peck; John Sullivan; and Clarissa Sullivan, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company; and John Hancock Distributors, Inc., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 96-10706-GAO. United States District Court, D. Massac

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Ohio High School Athletic Assn. v. Ruehlman, Slip Opinion No. 2019-Ohio-2845.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 13a0137p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - UWE ANDREAS JOSEF ROMEIKE, et al.,

JUSTICE STEIGMANN delivered the opinion of the court; In April 2002, the State filed a petition to terminate the parental rights of respondent, Lona Griffin, as to her son, J.R. (born July 1, 1999). Following a November 2002 hearing, the trial court found respondent unfit, and following a separate hearing that same day, the court found that it would he in J.R.’s best interes

The opinion of the court was delivered by COLLESTER, J.AD. In these consolidated appeals, R.L. and E.L., the natural mother and father, each appeal from a judgment entered by the trial court on April 27, 2005, terminating their parental rights to B.L., their son, and awarding guardianship of the child to the Division of Youth and Family Services (DYFS or Division). R.L. and E.L. each argue that the trial jud

MEMORANDUM PAPPERT, District Judge Paul Fallon (“Fallon”) opposes vaccines, believing that their benefits are exaggerated and risks minimized. He questions specifically the efficacy of vaccines for influenza as well as the stated number of flu-related deaths and hospitalizations annually in the United States. Fallon was fired by Mercy Catholic Medical Center (“Mercy”) 1 for refusing

The opinion of the court was delivered by KESTIN, P.J.A.D. In these consolidated appeals, M.M. and C.B. each appeal from a judgment entered by the trial court on May 10, 2005, terminating their parental rights with respect to their son, M.A.M., and awarding guardianship over the child to the Division of Youth and Family Services (DYFS or Division). M.M. and C.B. each argue that the trial court’s respective f

The opinion of the court was delivered by HOENS, J.A.D. In this guardianship matter, defendant Florence M.1 appeals from the entry of a judgment terminating her parental rights2 and placing her two children in the care and under the guardianship of plaintiff Division of Youth and Family Services (DYFS). We reverse and remand. Becaus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2020 Term FILED _____________ June 16, 2020 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 19-1047 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK