Cases

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- ) ) Puma Energy Honduras, S.A. de C.V. ) ASBCA No. 61966 ) Under Contract No. SPE605~18-D-1268 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Alberto J. Bayouth-Montes, Esq. Jerry Lucas Marrero-Cartagena, Esq

274 F.3d 148 (4th Cir. 2001) DANIEL ADAMS; ROBERT C. ADKISSON; THOMAS W. ADLER; MATTHEW ALBRIGHT; KANYIA J. ANDERSON; BRADLEY D. ANTONS; LONNIE E. ARTIS; JAMES S. BAILIE; JOHN BANKS; JAMES R. BARKER; KAREN MARIE BARNES; CHARLENE A. BEAHM; JAMES T. BLOUNT; WILLIAM BRADY; LARRY D. BRENEMAN; FREDERICK M. BROCCOLO; MICHAEL B. CARDEN; WILLIAM R. CARMAN; WILLIAM H. CARROLL; MARC W. CHADWICK; DAVID CHERESKIN; ROBERT E. CHERRY; RICHARD CHILDRESS; MARK COLE

395 F.3d 1114 Bill Badi GAMMOH, dba Taboo Theater aka Pelican Theater; Leslie West; Armine Michelle Bedrosian; Christine Johanna Fener; Charbonesse Garrett; Heather Eloise Elam; Stacy Joy Andre; Meghann Lara Ann Onselen, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CITY OF LA HABRA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 04-56072. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nove

NO. 01-15-00267-CV FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS FOR THE 1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS 3/25/2015 12:01:47 PM AT HOUSTON CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

GAIDRY, J. | ¡.The plaintiff-appellant, William Narret-to (Lt. Narretto),1 and the defendant-appellant, the City of Hammond (the City), each appeal the judgment of the 21st Judicial District Court on a petition for judicial review of the action of the Hammond Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board (the Board). For the reasons stated below, we affirm the trial court’s judgment, amend it in

JUSTICE McDADE, dissenting: The majority affirms the drug conviction of Andres Roa, rejecting his challenge to the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. For the reasons that follow, I dissent from that decision. I have no quarrel with the author’s thorough and scholarly review of the law relevan

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: Rodney Thompson and Andre Carter (collectively, “Defendants”) appeal their convictions and sentences for bank robbery, attempted bank robbery, and two counts of brandishing a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a) and (d); 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(l)(A)(ii); and 18 U.S.C. § 2. They argue that the distr

716 N.E.2d 935 (1999) Sherman Andre JAMES, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below). No. 02S00-9712-CR-704. Supreme Court of Indiana. September 30, 1999. *937 Nikos C. Nakos, Clifford, Larmore & Nakos, Fort Wayne, Indiana, Attorney for Appellant. Jeff Modisett, Attorney General of In

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, District Judge. By a motion filed August 25, 2014, plaintiffs moved for a default judgment. On November 6, 2014, this Court referred the matter to the assigned Magistrate Judge, the Honorable Vera M. Scanlon. On February 27, 2014, Magistrate Judge Scanlon issued a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that this Court (1)

198 Ill. App.3d 1002 (1990) 556 N.E.2d 709 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PAUL HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-87-2087. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (3rd Division). Opinion filed May 16, 1990. *1003 *1004

PRISCILLA R. OWEN, Circuit Judge: A jury convicted Paul Suarez for his involvement in a drug trafficking conspiracy and for firearms offenses. Suarez appeals contending that the convictions were not supported by sufficient evidence. He also asserts that the district court erred in imposing a 120-month (ten year) mandatory minimum prison sentence for possession of a sawed-off shotgun in furtherance of

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge. This case involves constitutional challenges to a city ordinance requiring “adult cabaret dancers” to remain two feet away from patrons during performances. The district court rejected these challenges by dismissing some of the Appellants’ claims on the pleadings and granting summary judgment as to other claims. We denied emergency motions for a stay of

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On November 2, 2018, the Court entered a Memorandum Opinion and Omnibus Order *706(Doc. No. 823) that resolved most of the pending motions in this case. The remaining Motions were set for oral arguments or evidentiary hearings, and they were held during the last week of November 2018.

Filed: January 31, 2002 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Nos. 00-2269(L) (CA-99-1851) Daniel Adams, et al., Plaintiffs - Appellees, versus City of Norfolk, Virginia, Defendant - Appellant.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 8, 2008 No. 06-41528 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED

REVISED JUNE 5, 2008 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 06-41528 April 30, 2008

837 So.2d 647 (2002) Shirley M. AVANTS and Jim W. Miley v. John Neely KENNEDY, Secretary, Department of Revenue and Taxation, State of Louisiana, and Elmer Litchfield, Sheriff of East Baton Rouge Parish. No. 2002 CA 0830. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. December 20, 2002. Writ Denied April 4, 2003. *649

513 F.Supp. 772 (1981) Joseph James BLAKE, Petitioner, v. Walter ZANT, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent. Christopher A. BURGER, Petitioner, v. Walter B. ZANT, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent. William Neal MOORE, Petitioner, v. Charles BALKCOM, Warden, Respondent. Nos. CV480-251, CV280-114 and CV478-309. United Stat

526 F.3d 809 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arzell GULLEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-41528. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 30, 2008. *811 Traci Lynne Kenner, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Tyler, TX, Joseph R. Batte, Asst. U.S. Atty., Beaumont, TX, for U.S. Zachary Joseph Hawtho

PER CURIAM. The judgments of conviction of first degree murder and of robbery are affirmed. The death sentences are set aside with directions that each appellant be resentenced to life imprisonment on the verdicts of guilty of first degree murder. Circuit Judge Wright dissents from the affirmance of the convictions of first degree murder. Senior Circuit Judge Wilbur K. Miller, Ci