⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Anderson v. Any Top Shop, LLC”

District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015-03-03 · Published · cited 8× · 82 F. Supp. 3d 723; 91 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 478; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27794; 2015 WL 1059362
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Chief Judge Ruben Castillo, United States District Court Plaintiffs Ulises Garcia, Jose Valerio. Aníbal Torres, Jr., and Johnathan Collazo (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) brought this action against Defendants Total Taxi Repair & Body Shop, LLC (“Total Taxi”), Dispatch Taxi Affiliation. Inc. (“Dispatch Taxi”). Dispatch Taxi Management, LLC (“Dispatch Management”).
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2025-04-15 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued April 15, 2025 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00791-CV ——————————— JOSE MANUEL LOPEZ ZEFERINO, Appellant V. ANDERSON MORRISON CONSTRUCTION, LLC; ANDERSON MORRIS
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2013-06-07 · Published · cited 7× · 402 S.W.3d 915; 2013 WL 2456273; 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 7011
OPINION Opinion by Justice MURPHY. Brendan Van Voris and his wife, Josephine Durkin, appeal the trial court’s summary judgment dismissing their negligence and gross negligence claims against Team Chop Shop, LLC d/b/a Chop Shop MMA and Jerry Howell based on a pre-injury release signed by Van Voris. We affirm the trial court’s judgmen
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015-03-19 · Published · cited 7× · 306 F.R.D. 312; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37256; 2015 WL 1321479
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion and Supporting Brief to Determine That This Matter Proceed as a Class Action, filed January 6, 2014 (Doe. 194)(“Motion”). The Court held a two-part class certification hearing with its first portion on March 10,11, and 12, 2014, and its second portion on April 3 and 4, 2014.
Anderson v. Iacullopublic domain
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013-08-02 · Published · cited 1× · 963 F. Supp. 2d 818; 2013 WL 3984443; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108609
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER VIRGINIA M. KENDALL, District Judge. Plaintiff Martin Anderson brings this suit against Defendant Carmen Iacullo and the Illinois Department of Transportation (“IDOT”), alleging that Iacullo caused the termination of his employment at IDOT based on his political affiliation in violation of the First Amendment (Count I). Specifically, Anderson alleges he was fired fr
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007-08-02 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 06-3618 H-D MICHIGAN, INC. and HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TOP QUALITY SERVICE, INC, Defendant-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2022-12-07 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-195V Filed: November 10, 2022 PUBLISHED Special Master Horner BRENDA ANDERSON, Petitioner, Findings of Fact; Shoulder v.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024-06-21 · Published · cited 1× · 105 F.4th 567
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1393 Doc: 61 Filed: 06/21/2024 Pg: 1 of 21 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1393 FAMILY HEALTH PHYSICAL MEDICINE, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company, individually and as the representative of a class of similarly-situated persons,
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2014-04-08 · Published · cited 102× · 87 A.3d 648; 2014 Del. Ch. LEXIS 50; 2014 WL 1366551
*653OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. In September 2010, Occam Networks, Inc. (“Occam” or the “Company”) announced an agreement and plan of merger with Calix, Inc. (the “Merger Agreement”). The Merger Agreement called for Calix to acquire Occam through a merger in which each share of Occam common stock would be converted into the right to receive 0.292
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007-08-02 · Published · cited 57× · 496 F.3d 755; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 18337; 2007 WL 2200477
FLAUM, Circuit Judge. H-D Michigan, Inc. and Harley Davidson Motor Co., Inc. (collectively, “Harley”) sued Top Quality Service, Inc. (“Top Quality”), alleging trademark infringement, false designation of origin, and unfair competition claims under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and state law. According to Harley’s complaint, Top Quality’s use of the name, “HOGS ON THE HIGH SEAS,” which it uses to advertise ocean cruise
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2025-04-04 · Published · cited 0×
DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. The decision issued on the date below is subject to an ASBCA Protective Order. This version has been approved for public release. ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of - ) ) Sheffield Barbers, LLC ) ASBCA No. 62367 ) Under Contract
Anderson v. Kohlerpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009-12-21 · Published · cited 19× · 397 Ill. App. 3d 773; 922 N.E.2d 8
JUSTICE O’MALLEY delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiffs, Richard A. Anderson and Sandra E Anderson, appeal the judgment of the trial court in favor of defendants, Donald J. Kohler, Betty J. Kohler, and Arrowhead Development Group, following a bench trial on plaintiffs’ complaint for breach of a contract for the sale
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2013-11-13 · Published · cited 0× · 987 F. Supp. 2d 1113; 2013 WL 6506319; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173619
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Motion for Summary Judgment of Denny’s, Inc., filed October 26, 2012 (Doc. 40)(“MSJ”); and (ii) the Motion to Continue Defendant Denny’s Inc. Summary Judgement [sic] Hearing, filed January 29, 2013 (Doc. 60)(“Motion to Continue”). The primary issues ar
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018-07-02 · Published · cited 4× · 333 F. Supp. 3d 1179
JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants' Brief in Support of Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), filed September 29, 2017 (Doc. 19)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on June 4, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whe
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-09-30 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WHALECO INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23-3706 (TJK) SHEIN TECHNOLOGY LLC et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The parties in this case are online marketplaces that offer “ultra-fast fashion” products for sale. Temu, a newcomer to the marke
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2024-05-02 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-22-00432-CV __________________ USA TODAY A/K/A GANNETT CO., INC., GANNETT PUBLISHING SERVICES, LLC, AND GANNETT SATELLITE INFORMATION NETWORK, LLC, Appellants V.
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2019-05-29 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PROJECT BOAT HOLDINGS, LLC, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : C.A. No. 12606-VCS : BASS PRO GROUP, LLC, : : Defendant. :
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024-05-21 · Published · cited 34× · 102 F.4th 772
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0115p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DOUGLAS MILCZAK, │ Plaintiff-Appell
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021-08-10 · Published · cited 41× · 8 F.4th 597
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-1949 BEVERLY ZYLSTRA and BERNARD ZYLSTRA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DRV, LLC, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2018-04-12 · Published · cited 34× · 311 F. Supp. 3d 1000
J. P. Stadtmueller, U.S. District Judge This is a trademark and copyright infringement case brought by Plaintiffs, collectively referred to as "Harley-Davidson," against Defendants, collectively referred to as "SunFrog." SunFrog runs a website where third parties can upload designs and logos, place them onto clothing, hats, mugs, or other items, and sell them. SunFrog handles printing the goods and shipping them, and it takes the ma