Cases

Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Judge. Introduction Montez Ballard (Defendant) appeals his convictions of two counts of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, one count of possession of drug paraphernalia, and one count of property damage. Defendant argues that the trial court ■erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a warrantless search of his hotel room.

Memorandum Opinion and Order Elaine E. Bucklo, United States District Judge In this action, Jessica Ballard, who is African American, claims she was terminated from her job as a crew caller for Illinois Central Railroad (“ICR”) because her supervisor, Pamela Clermont, harbored racial animus against her. She sues her employer under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1) and Secti

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1418 KELLIE M. BALLARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:12- cv-03737-RWT) Argued: September 20, 2013

Affirmed as modified by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John Marvin Ballard appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss his diversity action alleging claims of libel, slander, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. We have reviewed the record and fin

DeBRULER, Justice. Appellant Ballard was charged and convicted in a trial by jury of attempted robbery while armed causing serious bodily injury to the victim, a Class A felony. I.C. 835-42-5-1; 1.0. 35-41-5-1. The court handed down a sentence of thirty years imprisonment. 1.C. 85-50-2-4. As grounds for reversal it is alleged in this appeal from that conviction that an error occurred in the admission of certain evidence and that the

CHAGARES, Circuit Judge. *174 I. Introduction...174 II. Facts and Procedural History...174 III. Analysis...178 A. Sufficiency of the Evidence Challenge...179 B. Jury Instruction Challenges...182 <

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-01312-COA AMY WILKERSON A/K/A AMY DANIELLE APPELLANT WILKERSON v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/27/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DALE HARKEY COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JACKSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR

Justice SAYLOR, concurring. I join the majority opinion, subject to the reservation that I have some difficulty with our continuing refusal to entertain an essential weight-of-the-evidence challenge relative to the imposition of a death sentence. See Majority Opinion, at 412 (relying upon Commonwealth v. Reyes, 600 Pa. 45, 53-54, 963 A.2d 436, 441-42 (2009)). Although the majority explains

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCSC-135 No. 248A21 Filed 16 December 2022 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. AMY REGINA ATWELL Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 278 N.C. App. 84, 2021-NCCOA-271, affirming a judgment entered on 29

Opinion issued July 6, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00931-CV ——————————— JOSEPH RADLER, III, Appellant V. AMY PHILAVAN

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PATRICIA W. GRIFFIN CHANCERY COURTHOUSE MASTER IN CHANCERY 34 The Circle GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947 Final Report: April 5, 2021

JOHNSON, Justice, would grant the writ application. h Contrary to the majority, I would grant the writ application, finding that plaintiff submitted sufficient evidence regarding the standard of care to defeat summary judgment. Plaintiff, Daisy Ballard, filed suit against defendant, alleging a wrongful death claim (in addition to other claims) arising out of her mother’s, Mrs. Alma Noble Stubbs, eventual death

08/30/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 11, 2018 Session AMY ELIZABETH LUKER v. TERRY EUGENE LUKER Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 46595 Robert E. Lee Davies, Senior Judge No. M2018-00138-COA-R3-CV Amy Eli

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCSC-135 No. 248A21 Filed 16 December 2022 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. AMY REGINA ATWELL Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 278 N.C. App. 84, 2021-NCCOA-271, affirming a judgment entered on 29

LEE, C.J., FOR THE COURT: ¶1. In this appeal, we must determine whether the chancellor erred in (1) modifying the child-visitation order and (2) declining to modify the child-custody arrangement. Finding no error, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶2. Stephen Bradley Butler and Amy Lynette Bolen Butler

ACCEPTED 06-16-00079-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 9/6/2016 2:50:51 PM

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge: We are called upon to decide whether the district court had personal jurisdiction over an Austrian bank. The district court granted a motion to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) for lack of jurisdiction. We reverse. I. Appellant Elizabeth Ballard (“Ballard”) brought this class action law

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2025-CA-00625-SCT THEODORE LONGO, AMY LONGO, JOSEPH LEE, SUSAN LEE, GERALD SONNIER AND AMY DAVIS v. THE CITY OF WAVELAND AND BEACH WALK DEVELOPMENT, LLC DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/08/2025 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. RANDI PERESICH MUELLER TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: VIRGIL G. GILLESPIE MALCOLM F

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CA-00735-SCT THEODORE LONGO, AMY LONGO, JOSEPH LEE, SUSAN LEE, GERALD SONNIER, AMY DAVIS, AND 920 SOUTH BEACH BLVD., LLC v. CITY OF WAVELAND, MISSISSIPPI AND BEACH WALK DEVELOPMENT, LLC DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/16/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. RANDI PERESICH MUELLER COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HANCOCK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS: VIRGIL G. GILLESPIE ATTORNEYS FOR

ARGUED BEFORE: Barbera, C.J. Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty, JJ. Getty, J. The Bench, the Bar, and the general public should no longer tolerate the condition which 170 years of patchwork amendments have created out of the relatively simple Act of 1798. The Commission's basic job, therefore, has been to attempt to create reasonable order i