Cases

AMY, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. hi agree with the majority that an affirmation of the award of general damages to Trentez Gilchrist is warranted. However, while I agree with the lead opinion that there is insufficient proof of causation to support the special damages award for Tyron Reed’s seizure-related medical expenses, I would reverse the award of seizure

NORMAN K. MOON, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This diversity case is before the Court on the question of personal jurisdiction over Defendant Beverly Hills Porsche (Beverly Hills).1 Plaintiff Eugene Reed alleges claims of breach of contract, violation of Virginia's Consumer Protection Act, and fraud stemming from his purchase of a Porsche from Beverly Hills. Plaintiff initially contacted Beverly Hi

330 F.3d 931 Melvin D. REED, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.THE GREAT LAKES COMPANIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 02-3371. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued February 12, 2003. Decided May 30, 2003. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied June 24, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATE

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00045-CV ___________________________ LAWRENCE D. VELA, Appellant V. AMY SHERMAN-VELA, Appellee On Appeal from the 43rd District Court Parker County, Texas Trial Court No. CV19-0826 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. *1024Defendant, Insituform Technologies, Inc. (“Insituform” or “Defendant”) moves for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 33.) Plaintiffs, Gary Reed and Tom Vevea, as Trustees of the Min

AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed July 3, 2019 S Court of Appeals In The Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01171-CV AMY ROBILIO REED AND AMY ROBILIO REED, PLLC, Appellants V. CENTURION TERMINALS, LLC AND CENTURION P

GREGORY A. PRESNELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court without a hearing on: (1) the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 197) filed by Defendant Mitchell Sussman ("Sussman "); (2) the Response (Doc. 224) filed by the Plaintiffs, Orange Lake Country Club, Inc. ("Orange Lake ") and Wilson Resort Finance, L.L.C. ("Wilson Finance "); and (3) the Reply (Doc. 2

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2009 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN F. GRADY, District Judge. Before the court are several motions: (1) plaintiffs’ motion for class certification; (2) defendants’ motion to strike the impact analyses in plaintiffs expert’s declarations; (3) the motion of defendant University of Chicago Hospitals (“UCH”) to strike the testimony of plaintiffs’ expert, as applied to UCH’s nurses; and (4) plaintiffs’ motion t

DOI TODD, Acting P. J., Dissenting. I dissent. The majority has adopted the position advocated by United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA), concluding there was an insufficient legal basis to modify teacher seniority rights because the trial court did not adjudicate the merits of the constitutional claims brought by plaintiffs Sharail Reed and others (Students). The majority finds that a merits determination was necessary because the tr

481 F.Supp.2d 1190 (2007) U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Matthew REED, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-cv-00178-WYD-BNB. United States District Court, D. Colorado. March 27, 2007. *1191 *1192 *1193 Michael W. Solinsky, Glen

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOUGLAS MERCER PELL, No. 23-55188 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-03732- v. MWF-RAO AMY NUÑEZ, Director of Admissions, State Bar of California, OPINION Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the Uni

101 F.3d 155 65 USLW 2396, 114 Ed. Law Rep. 394,45 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1369 Amy COHEN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.BROWN UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 95-2205. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. Heard April 1, 1996.Decided Nov. 21, 1996. Joan

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OMAR SHARRIEFF GAY, No. 21-16906 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:16-cv-05998- CRB AMY PARSONS, Senior Psychologist; GREGORY S. GOLDSTEIN, Psychologist, OPINION Defendants-Appellants, and JENNIFER SHAFFER,

161 F.Supp.2d 73 (2001) Rickey REED, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, and Margo S. Kilbon, in Her Official Capacity, Defendants. No. CIV3:98CV00426(AVC). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. March 29, 2001. *74 *75 Amy E. Johnson, LoRicco, Trotta &

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. JOSHUA ETHAN REED, Petitioner. No. 1 CA-CR 21-0065 PRPC FILED 11-2-2021 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CR2015-110716-001 The Honorable Bradley H. Astrow

ACCEPTED 01-15-00685-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/1

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 17-2241 & 18-2534 AMY LEE SULLIVAN, d/b/a DESIGN KIT, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. FLORA, INC., Defendant-Appellant,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 17-2241 & 18-2534 AMY LEE SULLIVAN, d/b/a DESIGN KIT, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. FLORA, INC., Defendant-Appellant,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 17-2241 & 18-2534 AMY LEE SULLIVAN, d/b/a DESIGN KIT, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. FLORA, INC., Defendant-Appellant,