⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Amy Amanda Collins”

Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011-02-02 · Published · cited 0× · 54 So. 3d 1284; 10 La.App. 3 Cir. 844; 2011 La. App. LEXIS 120; 2011 WL 309427
DECUIR, Judge. | Rickey Collins filed suit against Shen-telle Lewis, Universal Casualty Company (UCC), and others for damages sustained in an automobile accident. Immediately after filing an answer, UCC filed a petition for concursus. Pursuant to the order attached to the concursus petition, both Lewis and UCC were dismissed from suit. Collins appealed their dismissal, and, for the following reasons, we reverse and remand.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2023-09-06 · Published · cited 2× · 676 S.W.3d 8; 2023 Ark. App. 363
Cite as 2023 Ark. App. 363 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-22-328 AMANDA HANSON (NOW JETTON) OPINION DELIVERED SEPTEMBER 6, 2023 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE COLUMBIA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2021-05-06 · Published · cited 0×
Order entered May 6, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01484-CV PNC MORTGAGE, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, N.A. SUCCESOR TO NATIONAL CITY BANK AND NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE, A DIVISION OF NATIONAL CITY BANK OF INDIANA, Appellants V. JOHN HOWARD AND AMY HOWARD, Appellees
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2019-06-24 · Published · cited 0×
Order entered June 24, 2019 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01484-CV PNC MORTGAGE, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, N.A. SUCCESOR TO NATIONAL CITY BANK AND NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE, A DIVISION OF NATIONAL CITY BANK OF INDIANA, Appellants V. JOHN HOWARD A
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2021-09-17 · Published · cited 0×
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed September 17, 2021 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01484-CV PNC MORTGAGE, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, N.A. SUCCESSOR TO NATIONAL CITY BANK AND NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE, A DIVISION OF NATIONAL CITY BANK OF INDIANA, Appellants V. JOHN HOWARD AND AMY HOWARD, Appellees
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2019-06-24 · Published · cited 0×
REVERSE and REMAND in part; AFFIRMED in part; and Opinion Filed June 24, 2019 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01484-CV PNC MORTGAGE, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, N.A. SUCCESSOR TO NATIONAL CITY BANK, AND NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE, A DIVISION OF NATIONAL CITY BANK OF INDIANA, Appellants
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010-02-23 · Published · cited 2× · 231 P.3d 645; 2010 OK 16; 2010 Okla. LEXIS 14
EDMONDSON, C.J. 1 The first-impression principal issue in these appellate proceedings is whether an action may be maintained under the Oklahoma Uniform Securities Act against innocent victims of a Ponzi scheme to force them to pay to the Department of Securities those amounts they received from the Ponzi scheme which are in excess of their investments in that scheme. We hold that the Department may proceed against the innoce
District Court, D. Maryland · 2005-07-22 · Published · cited 10× · 381 F. Supp. 2d 452; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17075; 2005 WL 1936166
381 F.Supp.2d 452 (2005) CLASSEN IMMUNOTHERAPIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. BIOGEN IDEC, et al., Defendants. No. CIV. WDQ-04-2607. United States District Court, D. Maryland, Northern Division. July 22, 2005. *453 Joseph J. Zito, Zito TLP, Damascus, MD, for Plaintiff. Amanda Page Masselam, David Bryan Bassett, Wilmer Cutler Picke
Supreme Court of Colorado · 2019-06-24 · Published · cited 21× · 2019 CO 67; 443 P.3d 62
JUSTICE HART delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Under Colorado law, equitable estoppel requires proof of four elements. One of those elements has long been detrimental reliance on the words or actions of the party against *64 whom estoppel is sought. In this case, we accepted jurisdic
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-07-29 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed July 29, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00427-CV HOUSTON PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION, IAFF LOCAL 341; PATRICK “MARTY” LANCTON; GABRIEL ANGEL DOMINGUEZ; ROY ANTHONY CORMIER; BRIAN RAY WILCOX; AND DELANCE SHAW, Appellants V. HOUSTON POLICE OFFICERS’ UNION; CITY OF HO
Lange v. Woodworthpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000-07-25 · Published · cited 0× · 22 S.W.3d 758; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1143; 2000 WL 1013793
ORDER PER CURIAM. Defendant Kathleen Woodworth appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis City granting a new trial for Plaintiffs Amy and John Lange. Defendant argues on appeal that the trial court erred in: (1) setting aside the jury’s verdict on the grounds of Juror Mary L. Collins’ nondisclosure of a second similar accident in that no such nondisclosure occurred because plaintiffs
Collins v. Heathpublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 1866-06-15 · Published · cited 1× · 34 Ga. 443
Lumpkin, C. J. It is needless to rehearse the testimony on the trial. Suffice it to say, that Heath and Amanda Knight utterly deny all the equity in the bill. Both alleging that the conveyance from Martin to Heath, and Heath to Amanda Knight were hona fide transactions, and made upon a fair consideration. Upon the trial, the Court charged the jury in substance, that if Heath took the title to the lot, without author
Murthy v. Missouripublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-06-26 · Published · cited 124× · 603 U.S. 43
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 43–108 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 26, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015-08-12 · Published · cited 15× · 173 So. 3d 1174; 2015 La.App. 4 Cir. 0209; 2015 La. App. LEXIS 1568
11 Jesus Rapalo-Alfaro purchased a policy of liability insurance from Certain Underwriters at Lloyds.1 Claiming he was *1176injured by an underinsured driver, he amended his lawsuit against the driver and his insurer and named Lloyds as his uninsured motorist carrier. His insurer filed a motion for summary judgment, which motion was supported by a certified copy of t
Jajua v. Ministriespublic domain
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018-03-19 · Published · cited 1× · 299 F. Supp. 3d 645
Rufe, United States District Judge Plaintiff Alice Jajua, a nurse, filed suit against her former employer, Diakon Lutheran Social Ministries, alleging race and national origin discrimination, retaliation, and a hostile work environment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,1 the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act,2 and
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015-05-05 · Published · cited 0× · 102 F. Supp. 3d 1360; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58546; 2015 WL 2058906
ORDER AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge. Atlas Logistics. Group Retail Services (Atlanta), LLC. (“Atlas”) operates warehouses for the storage of products sold .at a variety .of grocery stores. So. one could imagine Atlas’s frustration when a mystery employee began habitually defecating in one of its warehouses.1 To solve the mystery of the devious defecator, Atlas- r
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018-04-05 · Published · cited 14× · 2018 Ohio 1298
[Cite as GGNSC Lima, L.L.C. v. LMOP, L.L.C., 2018-Ohio-1298.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 105910 GGNSC LIMA, L.L.C., ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES vs.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024-07-17 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 07/16/2024 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:10:52 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE
Mills v. Abbottpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011-06-24 · Published · cited 0× · 350 S.W.3d 813; 2011 Ky. App. LEXIS 95; 2011 WL 2508162
350 S.W.3d 813 (2011) Melbourne MILLS, Jr; Bertha Darlene La; J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.; and Commonwealth of Kentucky, Appellants, v. Mildred ABBOTT; Lisa Abraham; Juanita Alton; Joann Alvey; Cindy Armstrong; Linda Back; Carla Baldwin; Lee Bartley, Jr; Patricia Belcher; Leisa Belding: Eleanor Berry; Margie Berry; Carol Boggs; Angie Bowman; James Branham; Kathy Branham; Norma Brewer; Karen Brown; Deborah Browning; Nathaniel Brumfield, on behalf
James v. Wilsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2002-04-19 · Published · cited 187× · 95 S.W.3d 875; 2002 Ky. App. LEXIS 770; 2002 WL 598330
95 S.W.3d 875 (2002) Joe JAMES and Judy James, Individually and as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Jessica Jeanette James, Thomas Wayne Steger and Sabrina Collins Steger, Individually and as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Kayce Steger and Chuck Hadley, Individually, and Gwen Hadley, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Nicole Marie Hadley, Appellants, v. Larry WILSON, Randy Wright, Glenda Collins, Connie Smith, Bill Bond, Ba