Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Luis Amparo-Hernandez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Amparo-Hernandez contends that the district court violated his constitutional rights in enhancing his sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) and § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i) of the advisory Sentencing Guidelines base

ACCEPTED 15-25-00176-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/10/2025 2:53 PM IN THE CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE 15™ COURT OF APPEALS CLERK AUSTIN, TEXAS FILED IN 15th COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS CAUSE NO. 15-25-00176-CV 11/10/2025 2:53:37 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk AMPARO STIEFEL Appellant v. TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION Appellee On Appeal from the Texas Health and Human Services Commission Appeals Division Cause No. 14-0952-M EMR No. 069-14 APPELLANT’S BRIEF Dona

TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA Nancy Hernández Chávez, Tu Casa Guest Ocean Park Inc., (en adelante TCGH), solicitan revisión de una resolución emitida por la Administración de Reglamentos y Permisos (ARPE), el 2 de agosto de 2004, mediante la cual, dicha agencia revocó los Permisos de Uso núm. 01PUI-00000-03379 y núm. 02PUI-00000-02775, expedidos para la operación de una hospedería en un Distrito Residencial Turístico 3 (RT-3).

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Collins, *713J.), rendered October 26, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, and conspiracy in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motio

Opinion issued August 21, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00755-CV ——————————— RAUL AMPARO ZUNIGA RODRIGUEZ AND ANA MARIA ORTIZ MARTINEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES, AND HEIRS OF THE ESTATE O

Opinión de conformidad en parte, concurrente en parte y disidente en parte emitida por la Juez Asociada Señora Naveira de Rodón. En épocas críticas como la que vivimos, de crisis económica, creciente desempleo y alta incidencia criminal que atenta contra la seguridad personal de todos los integrantes de nuestra sociedad, donde los valores sociales parecen estar en proce

KANNE, Circuit Judge. This case requires us to decide whether the government can sustain a drug conspiracy conviction solely on evidence that the defendant engaged in counter-surveillance during a drug transaction. Finding that such evidence alone can be sufficient, and finding the defendants’ other challenges meritless, we affirm their convictions. I.

*139 W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: Appellant, Gulf Fleet Crews, Inc. (Gulf Fleet) appeals a judgment entered on a verdict against it for $776,000 under the Jones Act. We affirm the jury’s verdict of liability under the Jones Act, but vacate the damage award

329 F.3d 253 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Radmen DOWNS-MOSES, Ramón Sánchez-Hernández, Raúl Salazar-Uriana, Gerónimo Amparo-Hernández, Larry Ward-Bryan, And Jerry Ward-O'Neill, Defendants, Appellants. No. 00-2535. No. 00-2587. No. 00-2589. No. 01-1002. No. 01-1073.

El Juez Asociado Señor Rebollo López emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Mediante resolución de fecha 9 de mayo de 1983 la Ad-ministración de Reglamentos y Permisos (A.R.P.E.) auto-rizó —al amparo de la subsección 54.03, inciso (5), del Regla-mento de Zonificaeión— la remodelación y uso permanente como dispensario médico de una estructura localizada en el Núm. 408 de la Calle Doce de Octubre, Hato Rey, Puerto Ric

Opinion HARRIS, Judge: ¶1 A man (Husband) and his wife (Wife) were attending a barbecue at their neighbor’s house one night when a fight broke out. During the altercation, Husband was stabbed thirteen times, and Wife was groped, assaulted, and threatened. Wife subsequently called the police and implicated three assail

Opinion TURNER, P. J.— I. INTRODUCTION Defendants, Remax International, Inc., and Jose Garcia-Yanez, appeal from an order lifting a litigation stay. Plaintiff, Amparo Gastelum, filed a complaint against defendants regarding her employment. Defendants moved to compel arbitration. The trial court granted the motion to compel arbitratio

*512 KEARSE, Circuit Judge: These are appeals from judgments of conviction entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Henry Bramwell, Judge. Defendants-appellants Carlos Sanchez, Fernando Medina, Amparo Medina, Clara Mesa and Hernando Mesa pleaded guilty to charges o

940 F.2d 722 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Shmuel DAVID, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Jaime Toro ARISTIZIBAL, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Amparo Toro ARISTIZIBAL, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Yehuda YARDEN, Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 89-1807 to 89-1809, 89-2110.

Opinion issued August 26, 2025. In the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00108-CV ——————————— EMILY J. BARTLEY, Appellant v. NORTH EAST PINE VILLAGE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION,

FAST, J.S.C., retired and on recall. There is no reported opinion discussing the requirement that all settlements of summary actions for possession be reviewed by a judge, pursuant to R. 6:6-4. This opinion addresses that issue in a case based on a notice to quit and demand for possession. The notice to quit gave the tenant two months’ notice to surrender possession, alleging that the tenancy was a mont

By Judge Paul M. Peatross, Jr. This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion In Limine regarding the applicability of expert witness fees as provided by the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia. Petitioner files this motion on behalf of certain expert witnesses identified in this matter who, according to Respondent’s claim, are not entitled to an expert’s reasonable fee under Rule 4:1(b)(4)(C) for their ti

PER CURIAM: Pedro Machado Alturo, a Colombian national, petitions for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act, and withholding of removal under the United Nations Convention Against Torture (C

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL Certiorari Procedente del Tribunal de Primera GUILLERMO G. ÁLVAREZ Instancia, Sala MARTÍNEZ Superior de

860 F.Supp. 890 (1994) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Amparo B. BOUCHEY, John E. Ricche, and Wendell Harbour, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 94-952 SSH. United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 23, 1994. *891 *892 Robert L. Shapiro, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, DC, for pla