Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Amin, M.D. v. O'Brien”
Kelvin Lynn O'Brien v. Statepublic domain
OPINION Rebeca Huddle, Justice Appellant Kelvin Lynn O’Brien appeals from his felony-conviction for engaging in organized criminal activity. See Tex, Penal- Code Ann. § 71.02 (West 2014),' Kelvin contends that the jury charge improperly permitted conviction ‘ without jury unanimity and improperly instructed the jury regarding an uncha
O'Brien v. Telcordia Technologiespublic domain
20 A.3d 1154 (2011) 420 N.J. Super. 256 Sharon Kelly O'BRIEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TELCORDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant-Respondent. No. A-4021-07T3 Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued March 1, 2011. Decided June 13, 2011. *1156 Christopher W. Hager argued the cau
Amin v. Taylor & Francis Group, LLCpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DR. MAHENDRA AMIN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-cv-1313 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell TAYLOR & FRANCIS GROUP, LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Dr. Mahendra Amin was accused, in September 2
ACCEPTED 01-12-00578-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS
Advanced Fluid Systems, Inc. v. Huberpublic domain
Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge Plaintiff Advanced Fluid Systems, Inc. ("AFS"), commenced this civil action alleging that the collective defendants-a former employee and several of AFS's competitors-colluded to misappropriate AFS's trade secrets and deprive AFS of valuable business opportunities. All parties have zealously litigated this case, proceeding through multi-faceted Rule 12 motion practice, substantial discovery, and t
Meyer v. Shehpublic domain
Filed 2/3/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO WILLIAM MEYER, B307734 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. BC673404) WILLIAM SHEH, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Ang
Buck Wilson Terry, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginiapublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges O’Brien and Causey PUBLISHED Argued at Lexington, Virginia BUCK WILSON TERRY, JR. OPINION BY v. Record No. 1682-23-3 CHIEF JUDGE MARLA GRAFF DECKER JUL
James Lee Frango v. Commonwealth of Virginiapublic domain
RUSSELL, Judge. James Lee Frango, appellant, was convicted of grand larceny of timber in violation of Code § 55-334.1 and, for unrelated conduct, second offense misdemeanor petit larceny. On appeal, he argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction for violation of Code § 55-334.1 because the Commonwealth failed to prove that the timber had any value, let alon
Bishara v. O'Callaghan (In Re O'Callaghan)public domain
304 B.R. 500 (2003) In re William O'CALLAGHAN, Debtor. Amin T. Bishara, Plaintiff, v. William O'Callaghan, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 99-14794-8G7, Adversary No. 00-243. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. March 6, 2003. *501 John A. Anthony, Esquire, and Stephanie M. Biernacki, Esquire, Gray Robinson,
United States v. Serunjogipublic domain
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. When his friend and countryman needed a bride to secure his stay in the United States, Ronald Serunjogi was the best man for the job. But after seeing to this marriage in haste, Ronald is now repenting at leisure, serving four months in prison, and one year of supervised release, four months of which must be spent in home confinement, after a jury found hi
Security National Insurance v. Amchinpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ORDER Legrome D. Davis, District Judge AND NOW, this 25th day of August 2015, it is hereby ED as follows: 1. Upon consideration of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (“FDIC”) Motion to Intervene (Doe. No. 45), Plaintiff Security National Insurance Company’s Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 57), the FDIC’s Reply in Support (Doc. No. 63), and Plaintiff
United States v. Al-Arianpublic domain
308 F.Supp.2d 1322 (2004) UNITED STATES of America v. Sami Amin AL-ARIAN Sameeh Hammoudeh Ghassan Zayed Ballut Hatim Naji Fariz No. 8:03-CR-77-T-30TBM. United States District Court, M.D. Florida. Tampa Division. March 12, 2004. *1323 *1324 *1325
Rouse v. Walter & Associates, L.L.C.public domain
513 F.Supp.2d 1041 (2007) Gene ROUSE and Doyle Wilson, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, v. WALTER & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., and Marvin J. Walter, Defendants/Counter-claimants/Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Viren Amin, Third-Party Defendant. No. 4:05-cv-00440-JEG. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. September 20, 2007.
Eustice v. Statepublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 899 Michael Eustice (Appellant) appeals his conviction for aggravated assault and battery alleging that his trial counsel failed to provide effective assistance of counsel. Appellant also claims that the jury's observation of him in restraints resulted in prejudice, and that the jury improperly considered punish
ANNE MCQUEEN v. CAROLE BASKINpublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ANNE McQUEEN, Appellant, v. CAROLE BASKIN, Appellee. No. 2D22-1482 November 17, 2023 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Jennifer X. Gabbard, Judge. Allison Morat and Ron
People v. Loganpublic domain
JUSTICE O’BRIEN delivered the opinion of the court: Defendant, Leonard Logan, appeals his conviction and 45-year sentence for first degree murder. Defendant contends: (1) the State failed to prove him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; (2) the State made improper remarks during closing argument; (3) the State failed to prove that he was fit for trial; and (4) his trial counsel pr
University of Massachusetts v. L"oreal S.A.public domain
Case: 21-1969 Document: 50 Page: 1 Filed: 06/13/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS, CARMEL LABORATORIES, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. L’ORÉAL S.A., L’ORÉAL USA, INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2021-1969 __________________
University of Massachusetts v. L"oreal S.A.public domain
Case: 21-1969 Document: 50 Page: 1 Filed: 06/13/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS, CARMEL LABORATORIES, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. L’ORÉAL S.A., L’ORÉAL USA, INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2021-1969 __________________
Digitally signed by Illinois Official Reports Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
United States v. Arthur Friedmanpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19‐2004 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. ARTHUR FRIEDMAN, Defendant‐Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the