⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

15 opinions for “Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD”

District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007-07-03 · Published · cited 9× · 494 F. Supp. 2d 54; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47886; 2007 WL 1893058
494 F.Supp.2d 54 (2007) AMGEN, INC., Plaintiff, v. F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD., a Swiss Company, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, a German Company and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., a New Jersey Corporation Defendants. No. CIV.A. 05-12237-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 3, 2007. *55 *56
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007-03-30 · Published · cited 5× · 480 F. Supp. 2d 462; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23864; 2007 WL 942104
480 F.Supp.2d 462 (2007) AMGEN, INC., Plaintiff, v. F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD., a Swiss Company, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, a German Company and Hoffmann La Roche Inc., a New Jersey Corporation Defendants. No. CIV.A. 05-12237-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 30, 2007. *463 *464<
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006-10-20 · Published · cited 4× · 456 F. Supp. 2d 267; 66 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 573; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76411; 2006 WL 2987949
456 F.Supp.2d 267 (2006) AMGEN, INC, Plaintiff, v. F. HOFFMAN-LaROCHE LTD, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, & Hoffman LaRoche Inc, Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-12237-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 20, 2006. *270 Andrew Kumamoto, Firasat Ali, Mary Boyle, Michelle E. Moreland, William G. Gaede, III, McDe
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008-10-02 · Published · cited 4× · 581 F. Supp. 2d 160; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77343; 2008 WL 4452454
(2008) AMGEN, INC., Plaintiff, v. F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD., Roche Diagnostics GmbH, and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-12237-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 2, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM G. YOUNG, District Judge. Amgen Inc. ("Amgen") sought declaratory relief to prevent F.
District Court, D. Nebraska · 2019-02-19 · Published · cited 5× · 361 F. Supp. 3d 938
John M. Gerrard, Chief United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the defendants' motion for summary judgment (filing 81). That motion will be granted and the plaintiff's complaint will be dismissed. BACKGROUND The facts of this case are set forth in this Court's December 12, 2017 Memorandum and Order. Filing 56. Briefly summarized, the plaintiff, Stephanie Ideus, received the b
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022-06-15 · Published · cited 0×
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MICHAEL GRIECO, Appellant, v. DAIHO SANGYO, INC., AW DISTRIBUTING, INC., and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, Appellees. Nos. 4D20-2294 and 4D20-2557 [June 15, 2022] Consolidated appeals from the Circu
California Supreme Court · 2010-07-12 · Published · cited 111× · 233 P.3d 1066; 49 Cal. 4th 758; 111 Cal. Rptr. 3d 666; 2010 Cal. LEXIS 6620
49 Cal.4th 758 (2010) 111 Cal. Rptr. 3d 666 233 P.3d 1066 JAMES CLAYWORTH et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PFIZER, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. S166435. Supreme Court of California. July 12, 2010. *761 Alioto Law Firm, Joseph M. Alioto, Joseph M. Alioto, Jr., T
District Court, D. Nevada · 2004-06-03 · Published · cited 1× · 321 F. Supp. 2d 1173; 2004 WL 1380484
321 F.Supp.2d 1173 (2004) HARRAH'S ENTERTAINMENT, INC. et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATION CASINOS, INC. et al., Defendants. No. CV-S-01-0825DAERJJ. United States District Court, D. Nevada. June 3, 2004. *1174 J. Ebert, J. William Ebert, Ltd., Las Vegas, NV, Kevin Johnson, Fish & Neave, Mark Rowland, Fish & Neave, Norman Beame
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014-07-24 · Published · cited 15× · 34 F. Supp. 3d 465; 2014 WL 3695329; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102661
OPINION McNULTY, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLES OF PARTIES, CLAIMS AND MOTIONS.473 INTRODUCTION.474 *473I. Procedural History.475 II. Factual Background .477 A. Plaintiffs.477 B. Defendants.478 C. Summary of the Claims.:.4
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010-03-23 · Published · cited 6× · 707 F. Supp. 2d 74; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27333; 2010 WL 1172629
707 F.Supp.2d 74 (2010) AMBIT CORP., Plaintiff, v. DELTA AIRLINES, INC., and Aircell LLC, Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-10217-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 23, 2010. *75 Brian T. Moriarty, Benjamin P. Hurwitz, David J. Brody, David J. Thibodeau, Jr., Hamilton Brook Smith & Reynolds, P.C., Concor
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023-05-19 · Published · cited 166× · 68 F.4th 1003
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0106p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ BROOKE CLARK, │ Plainti
District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2005-06-20 · Published · cited 0× · 374 F. Supp. 2d 673; 2005 WL 1463301
374 F.Supp.2d 673 (2005) ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION, Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc., and Corange International, Ltd., Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, v. APEX BIOTECHNOLOGY CORP., Hypoguard USA, Inc., and Medline Industries, Inc., Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs. Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc., and Corange International, Ltd., Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, v. Home Diagnostics Corpo
District Court, S.D. New York · 2011-07-18 · Published · cited 64× · 812 F. Supp. 2d 390; 2011 WL 2848195
812 F.Supp.2d 390 (2011) In re DIGITAL MUSIC ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: All Actions. No. 06 MD 1780(LAP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 18, 2011. *396 Opinion & Order LORETTA A. PRESKA, Chief Judge: Before the Court is a joint motion to dismiss a class-acti
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-08-02 · Published · cited 35× · 331 F. Supp. 3d 152
McMahon, C.J.: Plaintiffs J.M. Smith Corporation d/b/a Smith Drug Company ("Smith") and Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. ("RDC") (collectively, "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs" or "Plaintiffs") commenced this antitrust suit on behalf of themselves and a putative class of similarly situated purchasers of Namenda. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants - Actavis PLC (now known as Allergan PLC), Forest Laboratories, LLC, Forest Laboratories,
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003-05-13 · Published · cited 51× · 263 F. Supp. 2d 172; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8279; 2003 WL 21108371
263 F.Supp.2d 172 (2003) In re PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE LITIGATION No. 1456, CIV.A. 01-12257-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. May 13, 2003. *175 David J. Bershad, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, New York, NY, Nicole Y. Brumsted, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Boston,