Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ames Merchandising Corporation v. Waste Management of Rhode Island”
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 5431694 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX
ACCEPTED 15-25-00022-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/26/2025 10:33 PM No. 15-25-00022-CV CHRIST
ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM
Dasilva v. Border Transfer of Ma, Inc.public domain
Patti B. Saris, Chief United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs DaSilva and Ferreira used to work as delivery drivers for Defendant Border Transfer. They claim that Border Transfer improperly treated them as independent contractors when they were, in fact, employees, and that, as a result, Border Transfer unlawfully deducted certain business expenses from their pay under the Mass
ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM
ACCEPTED 03-15-00007-CV 4825837 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Hinrichs v. General Motors of Canada, Ltd.public domain
PER CURIAM. Florian Hinrichs, the plaintiff in this case, appeals from a judgment dismissing the case as to ‘defendant General Motors of Canada, Ltd. (“GM Canada”). The trial court made the judgment final pursuant to Rule. 54(b), Ala. R. Civ.. P. We affirm, I. Factual Background and Procedural History On June 24, 2007, Hinrichs was riding in the front passenger seat of a 2004 GMC Sierra
STATE ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON Skip to Main Content Accessibility Statement Help Contact Us
Kafka v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF FISHpublic domain
2008 MT 460 KIM J. KAFKA and CINDY R. KAFKA, Individually and as Husband and Wife; and as members of DIAMOND K RANCH ENTERPRISES LLC, a Montana Limited Liability Company, Plaintiffs and Appellants, and JACK BRIDGEWATER and MYRA BRIDGEWATER, Individually and as members of PHANTOM BULL ELK RANCH LLC, and JIM BOUMA and BARBARA BOUMA, Plaintiff-Intervenors and Appellants, v. THE MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF FISH, WILDLIFE AND PARKS, and THE STATE OF MON
JUSTICE NELSON, dissenting. I. INTRODUCTION ¶96 We are in danger of forgetting that a strong public desire to improve the public condition is not enough to warrant achieving the desire by a shorter cut than the constitutional way of paying for the change.1 ¶97 Ninety-one years ago, the State of Montana made it a lawful “business or o
Knight v. State of Ala.public domain
787 F.Supp. 1030 (1991) John F. KNIGHT, Jr., Alma S. Freeman, John T. Gibson, Susan Buskey, Carl Petty, Dennis Charles Barnett by his father Arthur D. Barnett, Vonda Cross, Tammi Palmer, Alease S. Sims, Stacey Levise Sims by her parents Levi Sims and Alease S. Sims, Gary Mitchell, Jr., Grover L. Brown, Frederick Carodine, Frankie Patricia Yarbrough, Dr. Charles Edwards McMillan, Horace W. Rice, Anthony Y. Lavonne Thompson by his mother Lois N. Thompson,
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge MIKVA. Opinion concurring in part and concurring in the denial of the petition for review filed by Circuit Judge CLARENCE THOMAS. MIKVA, Chief Judge: In this case, we revisit the propriety of the Interstate Commerce Commission’s (“ICC” or the “Commission”) finding that certain water carr
Port of Umatilla v. RICHMONDpublic domain
212 Or. 596 (1958) 321 P.2d 338 PORT OF UMATILLA v. RICHMOND ET AL Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued October 29, 1957. Reversed and remanded February 5, 1958. *598 George H. Corey, of Pendleton, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant. John F. Kilkenny and John H. Kottkamp,</
Piqua Branch of State Bank of Ohio v. Knooppublic domain
57 U.S. 369 (____) 16 How. 369 THE PIQUA BRANCH OF THE STATE BANK OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. JACOB KNOOP, TREASURER OF MIAMI COUNTY. Supreme Court of United States. *371 The case was argued by Mr. Stanberry and Mr. Veriton, for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. Spalding and Mr. Pugh, for the defendant in error.
dewdney v. duncanpublic domain
Vermont Superior Court Filed 02/1 24 Wmdham mt VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT 1 fl4
Knidel v. T.N.Z., Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION HILLMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Background Ibrahim Knidel (“Knidel”) has filed a Complaint asserting claims against T.N.Z., Inc. (“T.N.Z.”), Nouria Energy Retail, Inc. (“NER”), Nouria Energy Corporation (“NEC”), and Ziad El-Nemr (“Ziad”) alleging federal law claims for violation of: the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. (“FMLA”),
In re Estate of Damapublic domain
STATEMENT OF THE CASE. COFFEY, J. On January 3, 1889, Sarah Randall, hy her attorneys, Joseph P. Kelly, Esq., and H. I. Kowalsky, Esq., *27filed in this court a petition praying for the revocation of the probate of the Will of Luigi Dama, in which she set forth that Luigi Dama died intestate in San Francisco on the twentieth
Commonwealth v. City of Roxburypublic domain
Shaw, C. J. [After stating the .substance of the pleadings, amendments and rule of reference, and reciting the report of the arbitrator.] The objection that the premises were not described in the information with sufficient certainty, we suppose, was removed by the amendments afterward made, and by the agreement in the rule of reference that the pleadings might be amended, if need be, so as to embrace all the conflicting claims,
Garcia-Garcia v. Costco Wholesale Corp.public domain
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. After approximately eleven years of working his way up the Costco 1 employment ladder, appellant Leonal Anthony Garcia-Garcia 2 (Garcia) was fired following an investigation which revealed an inventory discrepanc