⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “American Telcom, Inc. - Adversary Proceeding”

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2019-07-25 · Published · cited 0×
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-6010 ___________________________ In re: John Patrick Raynor llllllDebtor ------------------------------ John Patrick Raynor lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003-10-03 · Published · cited 5× · 301 B.R. 217; 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 1424; 2003 WL 22474597
301 B.R. 217 (2003) In re WORLD ACCESS, INC., et al., Debtors. R2 Investments, LDC, Plaintiff, v. World Access, Inc., WA Telcom Products Co., Inc., WorldxChange Communications, Inc., Facilicom International LLC, World Access Telecommunications Group, Inc., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 01 B 14633. Adversary No. 01 A 01219. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.
Cobell v. Nortonpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2005-12-19 · Published · cited 40× · 407 F. Supp. 2d 140; 2005 WL 3466712
407 F.Supp.2d 140 (2005) Elouise Pepion COBELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gale A. NORTON, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 96-1285(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 19, 2005. *141 *142 *143
Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990-04-18 · Published · cited 20× · 792 P.2d 1287; 1990 Wyo. LEXIS 43; 1990 WL 44318
URBIGKIT, Justice, dissenting. I. THE ISSUE IN PERSPECTIVE This case questions whether society provides a remedy when public officials commit perjury, suborn perjury and acknowledge commission of perjury in the pointless and almost random incarceration of a person without justification. In refusing to consider only disbarment, censure or criminal prosecution, none of which will occur, I will no