Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company v. Payton Lane Nursing Home, Inc.”
704 F.Supp.2d 177 (2010) AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and American Motorists Insurance Company, Plaintiffs, v. PAYTON LANE NURSING HOME, INC., Perkins Eastman Architects, P.C. and Lincoln General Insurance Company, Defendants. No. CV 05-5155(AKT). United States District Court, E.D. New York. January 27, 2010. *178
Narayanan v. Sutherland Global Holdings Inc.public domain
MARIAN W. PAYSON, United States Magistrate Judge PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Pending before this Court is plaintiff Muthu Narayanan's motion to compel defendant Sutherland Global Holdings, Inc. ("Sutherland") to produce documents as to which it has asserted attorney-client privilege.1 (Docket # 45). First, Narayanan seeks unredacted preliminary and final versions of a
Donastorg v. Daily News Publishing Co.public domain
FRANCOIS, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 19, 2015) TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................215 PROCEDURAL HISTORY.........................................................217 SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD......................................221
Pettiford v. City of Greensboropublic domain
(2008) Nicole PETTIFORD and Anthony Pettiford, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF GREENSBORO, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:06cv1057. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. May 30, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SCHROEDER, District Judge. Plaintiffs Nicole and Anthony Pettiford, husband and wife ("Plaintiffs"), seek civil damages based on
734 F.Supp.2d 368 (2010) TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY as Administrator for Reliance Insurance Company, Plaintiff, v. DORMITORY AUTHORITY-STATE OF NEW YORK, TDX Construction Corp., and Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates, P.C., Defendants. Dormitory Authority of the State of New York and TDX Construction Corp., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Trataros Construction, Inc., Third-Party Defendant. Trataros Construction, Inc. and Travelers
Lia v. Saporitopublic domain
ORDER FEUERSTEIN, District Judge. On June 30, 2011, plaintiffs Don Lia (“Lia”), Mobile Management, LLC (“Mobile Management”) and N.R. Automotive, Inc. (“N.RAutomotive”) (collectively, “the Lia parties”) filed a complaint (“the Lia complaint” or “the Lia action”) in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Nassau, against defendants Michael Saporito (“Saporito”) and Jesse Arm-stead (“Armstead”
Nadine Pellegrino v. TSApublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 15-3047 ________________ NADINE PELLEGRINO; HARRY WALDMAN, Appellants v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Div. of Dept. of Homeland Security; TSA TSO NUYRIAH A
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
Allen v. United Statespublic domain
588 F.Supp. 247 (1984) Irene ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. No. C-79-0515J. United States District Court, D. Utah, C.D. May 10, 1984. *248 *249 *250 *251
In re the Estate of Erlangerpublic domain
O’Brien, S. This trial of the issue of the status of a contestant in the pending probate proceeding began on October 19, 1931, and with the exception of a recess of one day in November, and of three and a half days in Christmas week occasioned by the death of decedent’s sister, continued without interruption until Monday, January 11, 1932, at two p. m.; 149 witnesses were called in the trial, 834 exhibits were marked in evidence a