⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “American Lung Association v. EPA”

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021-01-19 · Published · cited 15× · 985 F.3d 914
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 8, 2020 Decided January 19, 2021 No. 19-1140 AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION AND AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION, PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND ANDREW WHEELER, ADMINISTRATOR, RESPONDENTS AEP GENERATING COMPANY, ET AL.,
District Court, D. Arizona · 1994-10-06 · Published · cited 1× · 884 F. Supp. 345; 39 ERC 2082; 25 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21428; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20287
884 F.Supp. 345 (1994) AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION, a nonprofit association; et al., Plaintiff, American Mining Congress, Arizona Mining Association, San Manuel Arizona Railroad Company, GSA Resources, Inc., American Iron and Steel Institute and Hearth Products Association, Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. Carol BROWNER, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Defendant. No. Civ 93-643 TUC ACM.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999-03-03 · Published · cited 16× · 134 F.3d 388
134 F.3d 388 45 ERC 2025, 328 U.S.App.D.C. 232, 28Envtl. L. Rep. 20,481 AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION, et al., Petitioners,v.ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and Carol M. Browner,Administrator, United States EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Respondents,Appalachian Power Company, et al., Intervenors. Nos. 96-1251 & 96-1255. United States Court of Ap
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021-08-27 · Published · cited 5× · 11 F.4th 791
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 28, 2021 Decided August 27, 2021 No. 15-1056 HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION, PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION, ET AL., INTERVENORS On Petition for Review of a Final Agenc
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998-01-30 · Published · cited 3× · 134 F.3d 388; 328 U.S. App. D.C. 232
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL. TATEL, Circuit Judge: On behalf of the nation’s nearly nine million asthmatics, the American Lung Association and the Environmental Defense Fund challenge the Environmental Protection Agency’s refusal to revise the primary national ambient air quality standards for sulfur dioxide (S02). Declining to pro
Supreme Court of the United States · 2022-07-13 · Published · cited 0×
7/13/2022 10:29:37 AM Compare Results Old File: New File: old_20-1530.pdf 20-1530.pdf versus 89 pages (424 KB) 89 pages (
Supreme Court of the United States · 2022-06-30 · Published · cited 0× · 597 U.S. 697
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2021 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detr
Supreme Court of the United States · 2022-06-30 · Published · cited 125× · 597 U.S. 697
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2021 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detr
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020-07-10 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 6, 2019 Decided July 10, 2020 No. 18-1203 CLEAN WISCONSIN, PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND ANDREW WHEELER, ADMINISTRATOR, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENTS BCCA APPEAL GROUP, ET AL.,
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002-12-11 · Published · cited 13× · 313 F.3d 852; 33 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20113; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 25290
313 F.3d 852 FLUE-CURED TOBACCO COOPERATIVE STABILIZATION CORPORATION; Universal Leaf Tobacco Company, Incorporated; Philip Morris, Incorporated; RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company; Gallins Vending Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees, andCouncil for Burley Tobacco, Incorporated; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Plaintiffs,v.The UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; Carol M. Browner, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency,
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020-04-21 · Published · cited 3× · 955 F.3d 1088
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 4, 2019 Decided April 21, 2020 No. 17-1257 LOUISIANA ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION NETWORK, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND ANDREW WHEELER, ADMINISTRATOR, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENTS AMERICAN FOREST & PAPER ASSOCI
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019-08-23 · Published · cited 9× · 936 F.3d 597
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 18, 2018 Decided August 23, 2019 No. 15-1385 MURRAY ENERGY CORPORATION, PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 15-1392, 15-1490, 15-1491, 15-1494
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019-09-13 · Published · cited 10× · 938 F.3d 303
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 3, 2018 Decided September 13, 2019 No. 16-1406 STATE OF WISCONSIN, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND ANDREW WHEELER, ADMINISTRATOR, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENTS AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION, ET A
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992-05-04 · Published · cited 17× · 962 F.2d 258; 22 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 469; 22 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20934; 34 ERC (BNA) 1980; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 9829
962 F.2d 258 34 ERC 1980, 60 USLW 2747, 22Fed.R.Serv.3d 469,22 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,934 AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION, American Lung Association ofNassau-Suffolk, American Lung Association of Queens,American Lung Association of Brooklyn, Environmental DefenseFund, Natural Resources Defense Council, State of New York,State of Connecticut, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Stateof Maine, State of Rhode I
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013-12-11 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 16, 2012 Decided July 23, 2013 Reissued December 11, 2013 No. 08-1200 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT COUNTY OF NASSAU, ET AL.,
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013-12-11 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 08-1200 September Term, 2013 EPA-73FR16436 EPA-73FR16436-01
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012-07-20 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 3, 2012 Decided July 20, 2012 No. 10-1252 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION'S CLEAN AIR PROJECT, PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, ET AL.,
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012-12-20 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Filed: December 20, 2012 No. 09-1322 COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE REGULATION, INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT STATE OF MICHIGAN, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 10-1024, 10-1025, 10-1026, 10-1030, 10-1035, 10-1036, 10-1037, 10-1038, 10-103
Supreme Court of the United States · 2014-04-29 · Published · cited 0×
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2013 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989-03-20 · Published · cited 19× · 871 F.2d 319; 19 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20759; 29 ERC (BNA) 1233; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3203
871 F.2d 319 29 ERC 1233, 19 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,759 AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY; Natural ResourcesDefense Council, Inc.; Sierra Club, New Jersey Chapter;New Jersey Environmental Lobby; New Jersey Audubon Society,New Jersey Public Interest Research Group; New JerseyEnvironmental Federation; American Littoral Societyv.Thomas H. KEAN, Governor of New Jersey; New JerseyDepartment