Cases

ORDER Honorable G. Murray Snow, United States District Judge Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants American Valet & Limousine, Incorporated, and American Valet Charters, LLC. (Doc. 13.) For the following reasons, the Court denies the motion. BACKGROUND According to Plaintiff Sheila Deschaaf s Complaint, Defendants “own, manage, maintain and

Opinion issued May 1, 2025 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00540-CV ——————————— AMERICAN SERVICES U.S., LLC, Appellant V. IDENTITY BUILT, LLC, Appellee

EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge Plaintiff Diva Limousine ("Diva"), a licensed provider of livery services in California, brings this putative class action on behalf of providers of pre-arranged ground transportation services against Uber Technologies and its subsidiaries ("Uber"). Diva alleges that Uber secures unlawful cost savings by misclassifying its drivers as independent contractors instead of employees. In doing

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Dial 7 Car & Limousine Service, Inc., and Eitan Chandally appeal from an order of the Supréme Court, Queens County (Lane, J.), entered September 16, 2014, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them for lack of personal jurisdiction and granted the plaintiff’s cross motion

Debra Ann Livingston, Circuit Judge: The Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. , requires that employers pay employees one-and-a-half times their regular rate of pay for every hour exceeding forty each workweek.

17‐2438‐cv Munoz‐Gonzalez, et al. v. D.L.C. Limousine Serv. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2017 (Argued: May 24, 2018 Decided: September 19, 2018) No. 17‐2438‐cv

*24OPINION OF THE COURT Saxe, J. We hold that the iconic “Taxi of Tomorrow” — the Nissan NV200 — developed and implemented by New York City’s Taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC) after years of public vetting, is a legally appropriate response to the agency’s statutory obligation to produce a twenty-first century taxicab consistent with the broad interests

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER John J. Tharp, Jr., United States District Judge American Transport Group (ATG), a property broker, sued two warehousing and logistics providers, defendants California Cartage Company (CCC) and Pacorini Metals, for the loss of two shipments of copper cathodes. ATG claims that the defendants negligently handled the loads, causing them to be lost or stolen rather than released t

ROSEMARY LEDET, Judge. | ¶ This is a declaratory judgment action seeking a determination that the parties had no agreement to arbitrate their underlying contractual dispute. The parties are Delta Administrative Services, L.L.C. (“DAS”) and Limousine Livery, Ltd. (“LLI”). DAS commenced this action against LLI seeking not only a declaratory judgment, but also an injunction to prevent LLI from proceeding with the arbitration pr

OPINION OF THE COURT Shlomo S. Hagler, J. In this hybrid article 78 and declaratory judgment proceeding, petitioners Greater New York Taxi Association and Evgeny “Gene” Friedman moved by order to show cause and verified petition, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, seeking a judgment, in relevant part: (1) annulling, vacating and setting aside certain revisions and amendments to titl

*24OPINION OF THE COURT Saxe, J. We hold that the iconic “Taxi of Tomorrow” — the Nissan NV200 — developed and implemented by New York City’s Taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC) after years of public vetting, is a legally appropriate response to the agency’s statutory obligation to produce a twenty-first century taxicab consistent with the broad interests

OPINION OF THE COURT Stein, J. The New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC) engaged in a lengthy process to create the “Taxi of Tomorrow,” culminating in rules that established a particular make and model of vehicle as the City’s official taxicab. We now hold that the TLC did not exceed its authority or violate the separation of powers doctrine by enacting those rules. L

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEVLIN HILLMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:18-cv-999-RCL AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Devlin Hillman and Tara Blunt sued two defendants—the American Federation of Government Employees (“AFGE”) and Local 2741—for violations of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959. ECF No. 1 On December 8, 2021, the Court set this case for a jury trial t

FIFTH DIVISION RICKMAN, C. J., MCFADDEN, P. J., and SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE PHIPPS NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS COURT. ALL FI

Opinion by CHIEF JUDGE LOEB T1 In this negligence action, plaintiff, Karen Bedee, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding that defendant, American Medical Response of Colorado (AMR), was not negligent and did not cause her injuries suffered when an ambulance in which she was a passenger hit several unmarked dips in the road. Bedee conte

Matter of Lee (AXA Advisors LLC--Commissioner of Labor) (2021 NY Slip Op 04518) Matter of Lee (AXA Advisors LLC--Commissioner of Labor) 2021 NY Slip Op 04518 Decided on July 22, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

Charlene Edwards Honeywell, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court upon Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 43), and Plaintiff's response thereto (Doc. 46). Plaintiffs filed a five-count Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 41) against Defendants seeking payment of overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act,

AUDREY G. FLEISSIG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This antitrust action is before the Court on Defendant Express Scripts, Inc.'s ("Express *1073Scripts") motion (ECF No. 15 ) to dismiss all five claims filed by Plaintiff Wholesale Alliance, LLC, d/b/a Pharmacy First ("Pharmacy First"). Express Scripts contends that Pharmacy First fails to sta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHN DOE #1, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 20-1558 (JDB) AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Jeffrey David Cox resigned as National President of the American Federation of Government Employees (“AFGE”)