Cases

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 19 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AMERICAN FEDERATION OF No. 25-3293 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO; D.C. No. 3:25-cv-03698-SI AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, Northern District

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 30 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AMERICAN FEDERATION OF No. 25-3293 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO; D.C. No. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, 3:25-cv-03698-SI COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) AMERICAN FEDERATION OF ) GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL- ) CIO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:18-cv-1261 (KBJ) ) DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) AMERICAN FEDERATION OF ) GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL- ) CIO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:18-cv-1261 (KBJ) ) DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) AMERICAN FEDERATION OF ) GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL- ) CIO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:18-cv-1261 (KBJ) ) DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

Griffith, Circuit Judge: In May 2018, the President issued three executive orders regarding relations between the federal government and its employees. Unions representing federal employees brought suit in the district court challenging various aspects of the orders. The district court concluded that certain provisions in the orders were unlawful and enjoined the President's subordina

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AMERICAN FEDERATION OF No. 25-3293 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, D.C. No. AFL-CIO; AMERICAN 3:25-cv-03698-SI FEDERATION OF STATE, Northern District COUNTY & MUNICIPAL of California, EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO; SERVICE San Francisco EMPLOYEES INTERNAT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-352 (CJN) DONALD TRUMP, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The original plaintiffs in this lawsuit are two unions that represent employees of USAID; they challenge a “s

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, National Council of HUD Locals Council 222, AFL-CIO, Civil Case No. 20-2683 (RJL) Plaintiff, Vv. FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANEL, et al., A A a _ a a_i Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (March ( 4, 2022) [Dkt. #19]. Plaintiff American Federation of Government Employees, National Council of HUD Locals Council 222, AFL-CIO (“Council 222”) is a public-sector union that represents employees

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ) AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR ) AND CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ) ORGANIZATIONS et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Local 8027, AFT-N.H., AFL-CIO, et al., v. Case No. 21-cv-1077-PB Opinion No. 2024 DNH 040 Frank Edelblut, Commissioner, N.H. Department of Education, et al. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER In 2021, the State of New Hampshire substantially amended its education and antidiscrimination laws.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE National Education Association, et al. v. Civil No. 25-cv-091-LM Opinion No. 2025 DNH 055 P United States Department of Education, et al. ORDER Ours is a nation “deeply committed to safeguarding academic freedom, which is of transcendent

422 F.Supp.2d 16 (2006) AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary, United States Department of Defense, et al., Defendants. No. CIV. 05-2183 EGS. United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 27, 2006. *17 *18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, Plaintiff, Case No. 25-cv-3553 (CRC) v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION A lapse in appropriations—more commonly known a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ) NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES ) UNION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 25-0935 (PLF)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ) AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE ) ASSOCIATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 25-1030 (

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 25-cv-420 (CRC) v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The first month of President Trump’s second administration has b

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR AND CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-339 (JDB) DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Soon after President Trump issued Executive Order 14158, creating the United

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR AND CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-339 (JDB) DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ first a

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 25-1169 O. DOE; BRAZILIAN WORKER CENTER; LA COLABORATIVA, Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; US DEPARTMENT OF STATE; MARCO RUBIO, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; US SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; FRANK J. BISIGNANO, in his official capacity as