⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “American Express Travel v. Hickman”

Hickman v. Batespublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004-12-15 · Published · cited 18× · 889 So. 2d 1249; 2004 WL 2891460
889 So.2d 1249 (2004) Patricia Dianne HICKMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee/Appellant, v. James Keith BATES and Sheila Quick Bates, Defendants-Appellants. No. 39,178-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. December 15, 2004. *1250 Bethard & Bethard, L.L.P. by James G. Bethard, Coushatta, for Defendants. C. Calvin Adams
United States Court of Federal Claims · 1999-04-07 · Published · cited 2× · 43 Fed. Cl. 424; 1999 U.S. Claims LEXIS 68; 1999 WL 191157
OPINION HARKINS, Senior Judge. James E. Hickman (plaintiff) was employed as a patrol officer in the United States Park Police (USPP), Department of the Interior, from August 18, 1974, until his retirement on March 29, 1991. On February 1, 1987, plaintiff sustained an injury while on duty. The complaint, filed March 29, 1994, invokes the Tucker Act Jurisdiction of this court. 28 U.S.C.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999-06-21 · Published · cited 59× · 179 F.3d 230; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13608; 1999 WL 409643
179 F.3d 230 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Masontae HICKMAN; Markus D. Chopane; Jyi R. McCray; Edwin T.Limbrick; Edmond Gasaway, Defendants-Appellants. No. 97-40237. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. June 21, 1999. Michael R. Dreeben, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, Paul
District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2006-11-09 · Published · cited 0× · 460 F. Supp. 2d 693; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82113; 2006 WL 3240011
460 F.Supp.2d 693 (2006) Clara Darlene HICKMAN, Plaintiff, v. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No.: 1:05cv00049. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Abingdon Division. November 9, 2006. *694 B.L. Conway, II, Conway Law Firm PLLC, Abingdon, VA, for Plaintiff. Brian Douglas F
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996-08-21 · Published · cited 11× · 679 So. 2d 527; 1996 La. App. LEXIS 1661; 1996 WL 474178
679 So.2d 527 (1996) Donald S. HICKMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EXIDE, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 28495-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. August 21, 1996. *529 Davenport, Files & Kelly by Michael J. Fontenot, for Defendant-Appellant. Nordyke & Denlinger by Keith B. Nordyke, for Plaintif
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018-04-06 · Published · cited 0×
04/06/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 23, 2017 Session GREAT AMERICAN OPPORTUNITIES, INC. v. BRAD PATTERSON, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 11-1419-IV Russell T. Perkins, Chancellor
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999-05-11 · Published · cited 13× · 186 F.R.D. 376; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7676; 1999 WL 329846
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY MOTIONS VESCOVO, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff, Mary Miller, a black female, brought this Title VII action against defendant, Federal Express Corp., alleging that she was discriminated against on the basis of her race. Specifically, plaintiff contends that after racial harassment charges were leveled at her by a fellow employee, she was disciplined more harshly tha
District Court, S.D. New York · 2013-12-27 · Published · cited 4× · 959 F. Supp. 2d 724; 59 Communications Reg. (P&F) 888; 2013 WL 6819708; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180863
MEMORANDUM & ORDER WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge: The September 11th terrorist attacks revealed, in the starkest terms, just how dangerous and interconnected the world is. While Americans depended on technology for the conveniences of modernity, al-Qaeda plotted in a seventh-century milieu to use that technology against us. It was a bold jujitsu. And it succeeded because conventiona
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010-12-20 · Published · cited 2× · 637 F.3d 1095; 2010 WL 5151630
GORSUCH, Circuit Judge, joined by PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc. I respectfully dissent from denial of rehearing en banc. Judge Kelly outlines several reasons why this decision is worthy of the full court’s attention. I write to note two more. I Our court has now repeatedly misapplied the “reasonable
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010-08-18 · Published · cited 5× · 616 F.3d 1145; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17249; 2010 WL 3239486
616 F.3d 1145 (2010) AMERICAN ATHEISTS, INC., a Texas non-profit corporation; R. Andrews; S. Clark; and M. Rivers, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Scott T. DUNCAN, Colonel, Superintendent of Utah Highway Patrol; Lance Davenport, Superintendent, Utah Highway Patrol, in his official capacity; John Njord, Executive Director, Utah Department of Transportation; and F. Keith Stepan, Director Division of Facilities Construction and Management Department of Ad
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010-12-20 · Published · cited 4× · 616 F.3d 1145
637 F.3d 1095 (2010) AMERICAN ATHEISTS, INC., a Texas non-profit corporation; R. Andrews; S. Clark; M. Rivers, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Lance DAVENPORT, Superintendent, Utah Highway Patrol; John Njord, Executive Director, Utah Department of Transportation; F. Keith Stepan, *1096 Director Division of Facilities Construction and Management Department of Administrative Services, Defendants-Appellees, Scott T
District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997-11-24 · Published · cited 34× · 178 F.R.D. 508; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22050; 1997 WL 851423
MEMORANDUM ORDER ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge. I. Introduction This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to a general assignment, made in accordance with the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), upon the Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery. See Rule 37, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A H
District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2010-01-29 · Published · cited 1× · 683 F. Supp. 2d 886; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8283; 2010 WL 412022
683 F.Supp.2d 886 (2010) Olga WILSON, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. 1:08-cv-0523-TAB-RLY. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. January 29, 2010. Theresa L. Dapper, Glaser & Ebbs, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003-03-13 · Published · cited 48× · 101 S.W.3d 703; 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 2216; 2003 WL 1090486
101 S.W.3d 703 (2003) Robert L. VANDEVENTER, Duane D. Woodrow, and B. Legare Walpole, Jr., Appellants, v. ALL AMERICAN LIFE & CASUALTY COMPANY n/k/a All American Life Insurance Company, Appellee. No. 2-01-145-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. March 13, 2003. *706 Bourland, Kirkman, Seidler & Evans, LLP, William L
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001-04-06 · Published · cited 5× · 138 F. Supp. 2d 222; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4940; 2001 WL 370515
138 F.Supp.2d 222 (2001) COMMERCIAL UNION INS. CO., Plaintiff v. NORTH AMERICAN PAPER CO., Defendant No. CIV. A. 00-30135-KPN. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. April 6, 2001. *223 Stuart G. Blackburn, Law Offices of Stuart Blackburn, Windsor Locks, CT, William e. Gericke, Cozen and O'Connor, Philadelphia, for Comme
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013-12-05 · Published · cited 16× · 999 N.E.2d 86; 2013 WL 6333532; 2013 Ind. App. LEXIS 602
OPINION BARNES, Judge. Case Summary William Klepper, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated ("the Class"), appeals the trial court's order adopting the special master's reports and entering partial final judgment in favor of ACE American Insurance, Inc., (CACE"). *88ACE cross-appeals, challenging the special master's
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2003-03-13 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-01-145-CV ROBERT L. VANDEVENTER,
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2003-03-13 · Published · cited 0×
Vandeventer, Woodrow, Walpole v. All American Life COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-01-145-CV ROBERT L. VANDEVENTER, APPELLANTS DUANE D. WOODROW, A
Supreme Court of the United States · 1990-06-04 · Published · cited 358× · 110 L. Ed. 2d 148; 110 S. Ct. 2323; 496 U.S. 167; 1990 U.S. LEXIS 2952; 58 U.S.L.W. 4704
*171Justice O’Connor announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion, in which The Chief Justice, Justice White, and Justice Kennedy join. In this case we decide whether our decision in American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Scheiner, 483 U. S. 266 (1987), applies retroactively to taxation of highway use prior to the date of tha
District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1982-06-24 · Published · cited 14× · 541 F. Supp. 755; 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13118
541 F.Supp. 755 (1982) UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. WC 80-155-WK-P. United States District Court, N. D. Mississippi, W. D. June 24, 1982. *756 L. F. Sams, Jr., Tupelo, Miss., for plaintiff. Carey E. Bufkin, Jackson, Miss., for defendant.