Cases

Fahey, J. (concurring). I agree with my colleagues in the majority that the common law of this state does not recognize a right of public performance for the creators of sound recordings fixed prior to February 15, 1972 (see majority op at 605), and that the question whether to recognize such a right is best left to the legislature (see id. at 606). Consequently, I also generally agree with my colleag

The opinion of the court was delivered by CUFF, P.J.A.D. Between 1961 and 2003, Parmalat Finanziaria S.p.A., (Parmalat) grew from a regional dairy in Italy producing and distributing milk and milk products to a multi-national corporation producing and distributing food products, including dairy products. Its growth was initiated by a technique developed by it to extend the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 16-2269 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAIME C. LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. No. 1:15-cr-00069-TWP-DML-1 — Ta

Baylson, J. I. Introduction In this case, Plaintiff, Nicole Katchur, alleges that Defendant, Thomas Jefferson University, wrongfully denied her admission to medical school. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant's rejection of Plaintiff's medical school application constitutes discrimination on the basis of her race, gender, national origin, and ancestry; that Defendant created a hostile educational envir

Dyk, Circuit Judge. In order to encourage the construction of alternative energy production facilities, Congress enacted section 1603 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-5, 123 Stat. 115 , 364-66 (set forth at I.R.C. § 48

432 B.R. 583 (2010) In re ENDEAVOUR HIGHRISE, L.P., Debtor. Endeavour GP, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Endeavour Highrise, L.P. et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 09-33151-H4-11. Adversary No. 09-03267. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. July 13, 2010. *593 Susan J. Taylor, Taylor Law Group, Houston, TX, for

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY....................137 II. THE INTERRELATIONSHIP OF POST-CONVICTION RELIEF, THE CAPITAL PUNISHMENT ACT, AND HABEAS CORPUS...........................143 III. LEGAL STANDARDS GOVERNING DEFENDANT’S CLAIMS...............................................154 IV. THE MERITS OF DEFENDANT’S PETITION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF...............