Cases

745 F.Supp.2d 2 (2010) James F. SULLIVAN, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC., CCS Holding Business Trust, Steven Sands, David Sands and Donna Ramsdell, each independently and together doing business as Credit Collection Services, Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-40220-FDS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 10, 2024 Decided July 18, 2025 No. 23-5183 CROWLEY GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC., APPELLANT v. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION AND ROBIN CARNAHAN, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, APPELLEES Appeal from the Uni

455 F.Supp.2d 822 (2006) AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS, INC., an Illinois corporation, Plaintiff, v. RIVERSIDE MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC., an Arkansas corporation, Defendant. No. 02 C 3518. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. September 21, 2006. *823 Stephen L. Tyma, Chicago, IL, for Plain

714 F.Supp.2d 648 (2010) AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., on its own behalf and as Servicer for American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 2005-4A, American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 2006-1, American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 2006-3, American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 2007-1, American Home Mortgage Asset Trust 2006-1, American Home Mortgage Asset Trust 2006-3, American Home Mortgage Asset Trust 2006-4, American Home Mortgage Asset Trus

346 B.R. 4 (2006) In re Terese SULLIVAN, Debtor. Terese Sullivan, Plaintiff, v. Decision One Mortgage; Household Finance Corp. II; Countrywide Home Loans; Bank of America, f/k/a Fleet National Bank; Option One Mortgage Corp.; Long Beach Mortgage Corp.; Washington Mutual Bank; New Century Mortgage Corp.; Accredited Home Lenders; CIT Group and Stanton & Davis, Attorneys at Law, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 04-19022-JNF,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT SUN-TRUST MORTGAGE INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE THIRD AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT JAMES I. COHN, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant SunTrust Mortgage Inc.’s (“SunTrust”) Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Class Action Complaint, and Alternatively, Motion for the Court to Abstain from Hearing Plaintiff Hamilton’s Claims [DE 107] (“Motion”). Th

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO CORNERSTONE MORTGAGE, INC., ) No. ED108758 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Charles County v. ) 0611-CV04932

MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER DAVIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on three motions for summary judgment: Motion for Summary Judgment and Dismissal of Counterclaims and Third Party Claims by Pinnacle Communications International, Inc. [Docket No. 78], Motion for Entry of Summary Judgment against American Family Mortgage Corporation and Michael Schn

Opinion HOFFSTADT, J. Plaintiff Edward J. Roberts (plaintiff) enrolled in a private health plan offering benefits to persons 65 and over as well as *137 disabled persons under the federally funded Medicare Advantage program (42 U.S.C. § 1395w-21 et seq.), and went to an urgent c

OPINION OF THE COURT RENDELL, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judges SCIRICA, AMBRO, FUENTES, FISHER, CHAGARES and VANASKIE, join. At issue on appeal in this class action litigation is the propriety of the District Court’s certification of two nationwide settlement classes comprising purchasers of diamonds from De Beers S.A. and related entities (“De Beers”).1

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. Plaintiff Deborah Tamburri initiated this lawsuit in state court, asserting claims for, inter alia, violation of California Civil Code § 2923.5, violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), unfair business practices, and wrongful foreclosure. Defendant Suntrust Mortgage

667 F.3d 273 (2011) Shawn SULLIVAN; Arrigotti Fine Jewelry; James Walnum, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. DB INVESTMENTS, INC.; De Beers S.A.; De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd.; De Beers A.G.; Diamond Trading Company; CSO Valuations A.G.; Central Selling Organization; De Beers Centenary A.G. David T. Murray, Appellant in 08-2784 (Pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 12(a)) Susan M. Quinn, Appellant in 08-2785 (Pursuant

MEMORANDUM & ORDER VITALIANO, District Judge. On February 20, 2013, plaintiffs Brian Cutrone and Jessica Cervone filed this putative class action against Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”), alleging violations of New York General Business Law (“GBL”) §§ 349 and 350, as well as breaches of implied warranties. The action was commenced in Supreme Court, Kings County. MERS answer

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 21-2742 ______________ R AND C OILFIELD SERVICES LLC, Appellant v. AMERICAN WIND TRANSPORT GROUP LLC ______________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

MEMORANDUM OPINION NORA BARRY FISCHER, United States District Court I. INTRODUCTION This is a wrongful death and survival action brought by Plaintiffs Cheryl Harris and Douglas Maseth (“Plaintiffs”) against government contractor Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc. (“KBR”), arising from the death of Plaintiffs’ son, Staff Sergeant Ryan Maseth, (“SSG Maseth”), who was killed in 2008 while-

OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. CROTTY, District Judge. The above captioned private securities actions allege, generally, that Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”), its executives, and certain underwriters made material misstatements in FNMA’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and in various securities offerings, concerning FNMA’s (1) subprime and Alt-A exposure; (2) r

STAHL, Circuit Judge. Star Financial Services, d/b/a Star Mortgage (“STAR”) brought an action against Aastar Mortgage Corporation (“AASTAR”) alleging, inter alia, service mark infringement and unfair trade practices. A jury-agreed that AASTAR had unlawfully infringed on STAR’S service mark under both federal and Massachusetts law. Nonetheless, it awarded no damag

428 F.3d 559 TEST MASTERS EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.; Vivek Israni, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Robin SINGH, doing business as Testmasters, Defendant-Appellant.Robin Singh Educational Services, Inc., a California Corporation, doing business as Testmasters, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,v.Test Masters Educational Services, Inc., a Texas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,Vivek Israni, Defendant-Appellee.Test

MEMORANDUM CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, Chief Judge. Presently before the court in the above-captioned matter are the motion (Doc. 63) for summary judgment by defendant and counterclaimant Wells Fargo Insurance Services, USA, Inc. (‘Wells Fargo”) and the motion (Doc. 66) for partial summary judgment by plaintiff and counterdefen-dant Darrell Diodato (“Diodato”), each pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Justice Brown delivered the opinion of the Court. This is a complex employment-discrimination case implicating the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act and multiple common-law tort doctrines. It arises from a report that Gilberto Rincones, a refinery technician, failed an employment-related drug test. Rincones sued his employer, WHM Custom Services, Inc.; t