Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LA ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, No. 21-55395 an unincorporated association; JOSEPH BURK; HARRY TASHDJIAN; D.C. No. KARYN PINSKY; CHARLES MALOW; 2:20-cv-02291- CHARLES VAN SCOY; GEORGE FREM; DOC-KES GARY WHITTER; LEANDRO SUAREZ, Plaintiffs-Appellees, LATINO COALITION OF LOS ANGELES; JOSUE TIGUILA, Intervenor-Plaintiffs-Appellees,

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 367–405 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 13, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

798 F.Supp.2d 707 (2011) EQUAL RIGHTS CENTER v. EQUITY RESIDENTIAL, et al. Civil Action No. CCB-06-1060. United States District Court, D. Maryland. July 22, 2011. *711 Isabelle Marie Thabault, Robert Mark Bruskin, Washington Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights, Joseph M. Sellers, Matthew Keith Handley, Peter Romer-Friedman, Cohen

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION NOTICE DATED AND FILED This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. December 27, 2023 A party may file with the Supreme Court a

368 F.Supp.2d 980 (2005) CITIZENS FOR EQUAL PROTECTION, INC., a non-profit organization incorporated under the laws of Nebraska; Nebraska Advocates for Justice and Equality, Inc., a non-profit organization incorporated under the laws of Nebraska; and ACLU Nebraska, a non-profit organization incorporated under the laws of Nebraska, Plaintiffs, v. Attorney General Jon C. BRUNING, in his official capacity, and Governor Michael O. Johanns, in his off

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR TAXPAYER RIGHTS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-0457 (CKK) INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (November 21, 2025) A nonprofit that provides tax advice to low-i

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE; No. 23-636 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY; CLEAN WATER ACTION; FOOD & WATER EPA No. WATCH; SURFRIDER EPA-HQ- FOUNDATION; ENVIRONMENT OW2018-0618 AMERICA; BAYOU CITY WATERKEEPER; BLACK WARRIOR RIVERKEEPER; OPINION

*831MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ANN D. MONTGOMERY, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On May 19, 2015, the undersigned United States District Judge heard oral argument on Whittier Alliance’s Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 13] and City of Minneapolis’ (the “City”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 18]. The Defen

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LENNOX INDUSTRIES, INC. and ) ALLIED AIR ENTERPRISES LLC. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N19C-03-045 AML CCLD ) ALLIANCE COMPRESSORS LLC, ) ) Defendant.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ALLIANCE COMPRESSORS LLC, a ) Delaware limited liability company, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0186-KSJM ) LENNOX INDUSTRIES INC., a ) Delaware corporation, and ALLIED ) AIR ENTERPRISES LLC, a

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 30, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert F

OPINION WILLIS, Judge.* These consolidated appeals arise out of a clawback action brought under the MUFTA by appellant-receiver. In one appeal (A12-2092), the receiver challenges the district court’s dismissal, on statute-of-limitations grounds, of its claims brought under the MUFTA against defendant-respondents Home Federal Bank, Klein-Bank, Merchants Bank, and M &

567 F.3d 554 (2009) Louise CORALES; Jamie Soltero; The Estate of Anthony J. Soltero; Jane Roe, I, a minor, by her guardian ad litem Mary Roe, I; Jane A Minor, by her Guardian Ad Litem John Roe 1; Guillermo Prieto, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gene BENNETT; The Ontario-Montclair School District; Kathleen Kinley, Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-55892. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

749 F.Supp.2d 1083 (2010) FAMILY FARM ALLIANCE, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth Lee SALAZAR, as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, et al., Defendants. No. 1:09-CV-01201 OWW. United States District Court, E.D. California. October 26, 2010. *1086 Brenda Washington Davis, Leslie R. Wagley, The Brenda Davis Law Group, S

OPINION AND ORDER DANIEL R. DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and the Statement of Uncontested Material Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 40), which was referred to Magistrate Judge Camille Velez Rivé for a report and recommendation (Docket Nos. 72 and 73). Upon review of Magistrate Judge’s Report an

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL No. 22-55317 DIVERSITY; DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE; SIERRA CLUB, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 2:21-cv-02507- GW-AS v. BUREAU OF LAND OPINION MANAGEMENT; DEB HAALAND, Secretary of Interior; NADA CULVER, Senior Advisor to the Secretary of the Department of the Interi

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. *963TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION..........................................................963 A. Factual

946 F.Supp. 1480 (1996) COALITION FOR ECONOMIC EQUITY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Pete WILSON, et al., Defendants. No. C 96-4024 TEH. United States District Court, N.D. California. December 23, 1996. *1481 *1482 *1483 *1484

659 F.3d 13 (2011) AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS, et al., Appellants v. FELD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Appellee. Nos. 10-7007, 10-7021. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued September 12, 2011. Decided October 28, 2011. *16 Carter G. Phillips argued the cause