Cases

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: Plaintiffs Daghrib Shaheed ("Daghrib") and Waheedah Shaheed ("Waheedah") bring these consolidated actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and New York state law against the City of New York (the "City") and several New York Police Department

ACCEPTED 13-15-00039-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 9/30/2015 1:20:38 PM

623 F.Supp.2d 454 (2009) Ronald AMBROSE, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Detective Vito Buonsante, Lieutenant Shields, Detective Jose Rosario, Detective Dan Danaher, and John and Jane Does, Defendants. Case No. 02-CV-10200 (KMK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 31, 2009. *457 Lawrence A. Vogelman, Esq., Shu

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Walter W. Hafner, Jr., A.J.), entered March 12, 2015. The order denied the posttrial motion of defendants Suchitra *1313Kavety, M.D., Jane Fields, C.N.M., and Associates for Women’s Medicine to reverse the court’s prior decision granting a mistrial and to reinstate the verdict in favor of defendants. It is hereby orde

Mae A. D'Agostino, U.S. District Judge I. INTRODUCTION1 In a complaint dated December 28, 2011, Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202, and money damages, to redress Defendants' alleged deprivation

MILLER J. *1146Plaintiff and respondent J.W., through her guardian ad litem, sued defendant and appellant Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. (Watchtower) and others for (1) negligence; (2) negligent *1147supervision/failure to warn; (3) negli

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Walter W. Hafner, Jr., A.J.), entered March 12, 2015. The order denied the posttrial motion of defendants Suchitra *1313Kavety, M.D., Jane Fields, C.N.M., and Associates for Women’s Medicine to reverse the court’s prior decision granting a mistrial and to reinstate the verdict in favor of defendants. It is hereby orde

OPINION OF THE COURT Tom, J.P. This is an action to rescind the conveyance of a condominium apartment (fourth cause of action) on the ground that defendant purchaser misrepresented to plaintiff, the condominium’s board of managers, that she would use the unit as a private residence and, instead, established a professional day care business at the premises.

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: The plaintiff Jeena Lee-Walker claims that New York City school officials retaliated against her because she taught a lesson to her ninth grade students about the Central Park Five, and because of a subsequent discussion that she had with school officials about that class. She claims that the school officials and the New York City Department of Education (the

Concurrence by Judge Owens WARDLAW, Circuit Judge: *485It is no hyperbole to say that Dulce Garcia embodies the American dream. Born into poverty, Garcia and her parents shared a San Diego house with other families to save money on rent; she was even homeless for a time as a child. But she studied hard and excelled academical

Mercure, J.P. Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court (Dowd, J.), entered April 13, 2009 in Chenango County, which granted a motion by defendants Lucas Petkash and Gail A. Petkash for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them, and (2) from the judgment entered thereon. In August 2007, defendant Patrick A. Ambrose, a locomotive engineer for Canadian Pacific Railway, was traveling home from wor

OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge: In this tax refund suit, plaintiffs claimed a casualty loss deduction under section 165 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code) based on the loss of their home to a fire. Although their home was insured, plaintiffs failed to file, on a timely basis, documentation required by their policy, and coverage was denied. Plaintiffs challenged that denial in court, but lost. They then

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County [Thomas A. Stander, J.], *1298 entered July 23, 2014) to review a determination of respondents. The determination denied petitioner’s application for benefi

Mae A. D'Agostino, U.S. District Judge I. INTRODUCTION1 In an amended complaint dated February 14, 2012, Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202, and money damages, to redress Defendants' alleged de

Motion to vacate the Court of Appeals order of dismissal dated January 19, 1982 denied. [See 55 NY2d 877.]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on July 18, 1975, dismissing the petition in this proceeding, brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The reclassification resolution challenged by petitioners was adopted in September, 1973. This proceeding was not commenced until about 16 months later and is, therefore, barred by the four-month Statute of Limitations contained in CPLR 217. (Mat

OPINION OF THE COURT Order reversed, with costs, and the petition dismissed on the authority of Yetman v D’Ambrose (46 NY2d 830). Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg.

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division is modified in accordance with the following memorandum. In this article 78 proceeding petitioners sought an order directing respondents to certify them for appointment and also to direct their appointment to the position of captain in the New York City Transit Police Department. In the alternative an order enjoining the termination of the eligible l

OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, with costs, on the opinion by Mr. Justice Harold Baer at Special Term [92 Misc 2d 585.] Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.

814 N.E.2d 970 (2004) 351 Ill. App.3d 627 286 Ill.Dec. 744 Sanford WELTON, Jr., and Adair Ward, Co-Special-Representatives for the Estate of Sanford Welton, Sr., Deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James AMBROSE and Memorial Medical Center, Defendants-Appellees. No. 4-03-0590. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District. Argued J