Cases

Altice, Judge. *1167 Case Summary [1] Amber Hamilton was shot in the face during an altercation that transpired after a group of individuals entered the Steak 'n Shake restaurant where she was eating and verbally threatened and taunted her and h

OPINION THAPAR, Circuit Judge. The contempt power ensures that the judiciary’s mandates are authoritative rather than advisory. But an imperious judiciary is just as problematic as a powerless one. So the contempt power is limited: A party cannot be-held in contempt unless it has violated a definite and spe

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 16a0114p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ AMBER GASCHO, on behalf of herself and all others ┐ similarly situated, et al., │ Plaint

KAPSNER, Justice. [¶ 1] Joe Waldock appeals from a summary judgment quieting title to 25 percent of the mineral interests under a tract of land in Mountrail County in the successors in interest of the Estate of William C. Edwardson. Waldock argues the district *757court erred in deciding a 1954 administrator’s deed from Edwardson’s Estate to Waldoek’s predecessor in i

*********** Upon review of the competent evidence of record, with reference to the errors assigned, and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, the Full Commission finds good grounds to receive further evidence, but not to rehear the parties or their representatives. Upon reconsideration of the evidence, the Full Commission affirms, with modifications, the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner, and enters the following O

Matter of Amber L.M. (Cheryl M.) (2018 NY Slip Op 08484) Matter of Amber L.M. (Cheryl M.) 2018 NY Slip Op 08484 Decided on December 12, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reportin

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

OPINION REYES, Judge. This appeal arises out of a medical-malpractice suit and a district court protective order limiting the scope of an “informal discussion” with a treating physician authorized under Minn.Stat. § 595.02, subd. 5. Appellants challenge the order, arguing that the district court erred in interpreting the statute to prevent them from aski

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan June 1, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 161816 (19)

Filed 12/16/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE AMBER G. et al., Petitioners, v. G061684 THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE (Super. Ct. No. 21DP0578) COUNTY, OPINION

Matter of Amber N. v Andrew S. (2021 NY Slip Op 06810) Matter of Amber N. v Andrew S. 2021 NY Slip Op 06810 Decided on December 07, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bur

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan January 29, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 160111

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan December 22, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 161177

Matter of Amber N. v Andrew S. (2021 NY Slip Op 06810) Matter of Amber N. v Andrew S. 2021 NY Slip Op 06810 Decided on December 07, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bur

Broderick v Amber Ct. Assisted Living (2021 NY Slip Op 06981) Broderick v Amber Ct. Assisted Living 2021 NY Slip Op 06981 Decided on December 15, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State La

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan July 25, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

OPINION OF THE COURT KRAUSS, Judge: A panel of officers, sitting as a general court-martial, convicted appellant, contrary to her pleas, of three specifications of conspiracy to commit larceny, one specification of larceny, and six specifications of forgery, in violation of Articles 81, 121, and 123, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 881, 92

04/21/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 1, 2021 AMBER LYN ROGERS v. JOSHUA MICHAEL ROGERS, SR. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Blount County No. OP-25338 Tammy M. Harrington, Judge _______________

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-14-00054-CR AMBER RODGERS, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 5 Den

Hoover, P.J. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Amber Taylor ("Appellant"), appeals from a decision by the Highland Court of Common Pleas, which granted a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant-appellee, Rajiv R. Patel, M.D. ("Appellee"). The trial court found that Appellant had failed to send her notice of claim letter within the statute of limitations for medical malpractice. Appellant alleges that the statute of limitations did n