Cases

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-17-00014-CV AMANDA HARRIS, APPELLANT V. NIDHI GOPAL RANEBENUR, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 236th District Court

Cite as 2022 Ark. App. 499 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-22-265 Opinion Delivered December 7, 2022 AMANDA HARRIS APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE LONOKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 43JV-19-86] ARK

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 29, 2014 Session EMMA HARRIS ET AL. V. AMANDA B. ALDMON ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 180843-2 Michael W. Moyers, Chancellor No. E2014-00203-COA-R3-CV-FILED-MARCH 30, 2015 In this appeal, the Court is asked to determine whether certain provisions of restrictive covena

LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: Former employees of the college that had contracted to oversee breath alcohol testing for the Harris County Sheriffs Office brought suit against the County, the District Attorney, and one of her assistants, for causing their termination by the college. The suit was brought under Section 1983 for violations of the plaintiffs’ First Amendment righ

*539 Opinion KLINE, P. J. Appellant Amanda A. appeals from orders of the juvenile court continuing her as a ward of the court under Welfare and Institutions Code 1 section 602 and committing her to the custody of the probatio

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-21-00032-CV __________________ AMANDA ANN CHAPA AND JAMES LUTHER, Appellants V. TINA HARRIS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF MINOR CHILD,

ORDER PER CURIAM. Arrian Harris (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Mov-ant argues the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief because: (1) Movant’s trial counsel failed to adequately prepare Movant to testify in his own defense; (2) Movant’s trial coun

ORDER PER CURIAM. Lamarr Harris (Defendant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis convicting him of second-degree domestic assault. Defendant asserts that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for new trial because defense counsel had an actual conflict of interest; and (2) sentencing him as a prior offender and prior domestic violence offender in violati

BRYANT, Judge. Where exceptional circumstances do not exist to justify suspending our Rules of Appellate Procedure and reaching an issue pursuant to Rule 2, we will not address defendants’ argument. Where the trial court’s jury instructions clearly required that the State prove defendants were the perpetrators of the crimes charged, we find no plain error by the trial court’s failure to give a specific instruction regarding

MEMORANDUM OPINION MICHAEL F. URBANSKI, District Judge. Plaintiffs Joanne Harris, Jessica Duff, Christy Berghoff, and Victoria Kidd brought this suit challenging Virginia’s refusal to allow same-sex marriages and its refusal to recognize same-sex marriages performed by sister states. Defendants are Janet M. Rainey, in her official capacity as the State Registrar of Vital Records, and Thomas E.

Filed 8/26/13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S081700 v. ) ) WILLIE LEO HARRIS, ) ) Kern County Defendant and Appellant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION MICHAEL F. URBANSKI, District Judge. Plaintiffs Joanne Harris and Jessica Duff, an unmarried same-sex couple living in the Western District of Virginia, and Christy Berghoff and Victoria Kidd, a same-sex couple married under the laws of the District of Columbia and also living in the Western District of Virginia, brought this action against defendants Robert F. McDonnell, in

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES F. HOLDERMAN, Chief Judge: In their Second Amended Complaint, plaintiffs Mike Harris and Jeff Dunstan allege, as individuals and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, that comScore, Inc. (“comScore”) improperly obtained and used personal information from their computers after they downloaded and installed eomScore’s software. (Dkt. No. 169.) Th

Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Judge Introduction Jerald L. Harris (Defendant) appeals the judgment entered upon his convictions of three counts of first-degree robbery, one count of attempted first-degree robbery, attempted forcible sodomy, kidnapping,- resisting arrest, and six associated counts of armed criminal action. Defendant argues the trial cou

815 F.Supp.2d 6 (2011) William S. HARRIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. James E. KOENIG, et. al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 02-618. United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 27, 2011. *7 Bryan Taylor Veis, James Brian McTigue, James A. Moore, McTigue & Porter, Gregory Yann Porter, Bailey & Glasser, LLP, Washing

MOORE, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which McKINLEY, D.J., joined. GRIFFIN, J. (pp. 523-27), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. OPINION KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Anthony Harris (“Harris”) filed suit against Defendants-Appellees Amanda Spies Bornhorst (“Spies”)1 and Tuscarawas Cou

WOLF, J. Appellant, the mother, challenges the trial court’s final judgment of paternity and custody order regarding her two children. She alleges that the trial court made three errors that merit discussion: (1) the trial court erred in granting majority time-sharing of the older child to appel-lee, a non-relative; (2) the trial court erred in calculating child support; and (3)

315 S.W.3d 685 (2010) In re Art HARRIS, Relator. No. 01-09-00771-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). July 1, 2010. Rehearing Overruled August 6, 2010. *687 Amanda L. Bush, Charles L. Babcock, Nancy Hamilton, Jackson Walker, LLP, Houston, TX, for Appellant. *688

673 F.Supp.2d 8 (2009) William S. HARRIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. James E. KOENIG, et. al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 02-618 (GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 14, 2009. *9 Bryan Taylor Veis, James Brian McTigue, McTigue & Porter, James A. Moore, McTigue & Veis, LLP, Washington, DC, Brian

Court of Appeals Tenth Appellate District of Texas 10-25-00056-CV Sarita Vaughan, Appellant v. Amanda Vergara, Appellee On appeal from the 18th District Court of Johnson County, Texas Judge Sydney B. Hewl