Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 Mary F. Walrath, United States Bankruptcy Judge Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint and to Transfer Venue filed by WMI Liquidating Trust (the “Liquidating Trust”) in an adversary proceeding brought by Mark J. Sutton (the “Plaintiff’). In its Motion, the Liquidating Trust seeks to dismiss the Complaint for lack of service and failure to sta

This is a divorce case. The only issues concern whether the trial court abused its discretion in determining the division of property and the award of alimony. Amanda Sutton (wife) and Herman B. Sutton (husband) had been married approximately thirty-six years when the wife filed for divorce in 1991, alleging incompatibility of temperament and adultery. The record reveals that both parties had retired and that the wife is disabled. The wife receives monthly disability benefits o

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 2000 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. AMANDA LEE SUTTON Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 214146 Stephen M. Bevil, Judge No. E1999-00920-CCA-R3-CD October 2, 2000 The defendant, a former day care wor

314 S.W.3d 272 (2009) 2009 Ark. 109 Ronald SUTTON and Bonnie Sutton, Appellants, v. Lonnie SUTTON and Lorene Sutton, Appellees. No. 08-613. Supreme Court of Arkansas. March 5, 2009. Walters & Gaston, by: Amanda R. Cox and Troy Gaston, Greenwood, for appellants. *273 Christian & Byars, by: Ed

Matter of Mathias B. (Monique B.) (2025 NY Slip Op 05077) Matter of Mathias B. (Monique B.) 2025 NY Slip Op 05077 Decided on September 24, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

OPINION ROGERS, Circuit Judge. The Hague Abduction Convention, which is implemented by statute in the United States,. requires the return of abducted children to the state (i.e,, nation) of habitual residence, so that the courts of that state may resolve custody issues. This case involves an exception that applies when there is clear and convincing evide

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1464 AMANDA JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. METHODIST HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION, doing business as UNITY POINT HEALTH—CENTRAL ILLINOIS, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from th

GRIFFIN, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which SUTTON, J., joined. CLAY, J. (pp. 492-503); delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge. Pretrial detainees must tolerate some invasion of them privacy in order to accommodate the important government interests necessary for the operation of the detention facility. For instance, detainees may be subjec

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-21-00201-CV ________________ PAMELA E. CARIAS, Appellant V. AMANDA KAY OWENS, Appellee _______________________________________

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT AMANDA EVERETT, ) ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) WD85514 ) (consolidated with WD85629) VALERIE VANCE and ) BEVERLEY VANCE, ) Filed: Decembe

OPINION ROBB, Judge. Case Summary and Issue Ann Baker Sutton (“Mother”) appeals from the trial court’s order modifying custody and granting primary physical and legal custody of the parties’ fifteen-year-old son, B.S. (“Child”), to Milo Sutton (“Father”). Mother raises one issue: whether the trial court’s decision to

MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District. Judge. Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION.477 II. STANDARD OF REVIEW .479 III. MOOTNESS.480 IV. ARAMARK DEFENDANTS’MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT .482 A. State Action Analysis.482 B. Plaintiff s First Amendment Claims .483 1. Claims Against Aramark_.“.483 <

182 S.W.3d 715 (2006) Donnie W. SUTTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. ED 86186. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One. January 24, 2006. Amanda R. Schehr, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. *716 Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jayne T. Woods, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

CHAMBERLIN, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶1. The Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance (the "Commission") recommends that the Court publicly reprimand and assess a $500 fine against Judge Frank Sutton, a justice court judge for Post Three in Hinds County. The Commission made this recommendation after finding by clear and convincing evidence that Judge Sutton's conduct constituted mi

ROBERT WAYNE CLARK and wife, VALINA LYNNE CLARK, Plaintiffs, v. KRISTEN SUTTON and JOSH BARE, Defendants. No. COA09-1118. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Filed May 18, 2010. Bunch, Robins & Stubblefield, LLP, by Thomas D. Robins, for plaintiffs-appellants. No brief filed on behalf of defendants-appellees. UNPUBLISHED OPINION ROBERT C. HUNTER, Judge.</

OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. Best we can tell, the crime at issue in this case and the issue prompted by it are unique. The crime: Individuals reprogrammed ATMs to dispense $20 bills for each $1 they were supposed to dispense. Requesting $40 at a compromised ATM thus would deliver f

OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. Amanda Crosby filed this lawsuit against Rohm and Haas under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., seeking to recover benefits allegedly owed to her as a beneficiary of her father’s life insurance policy with the company. She also sought monetary penalties from th

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0124p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT GARY B., JESSIE K., CRISTOPHER R., ISAIAS R., ┐ ESMERALDA V., PAUL M., and JAIME R., minors, │ Plaintiffs-Appellants, │

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2025 ND 26 Access Independent Health Services, Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic, on behalf of itself and its patients; Kathryn L. Eggleston M.D., on behalf of herself and her patients; Ana Tobiasz, M.D. on behalf of herself and her patients; Erica Hofland, M.D., on behalf of herself and her patients; Collette Lessard, M.D. on behalf of herself and her patients,

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-17-00463-CV ___________________________ LATTER AND BLUM OF TEXAS, LLC D/B/A REALTY ASSOCIATES, Appellant V. PAUL MURPHY, Appellee On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2