Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Alyssa Danielle Hall”
Harper v. Hallpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCSC-121 No. 413PA21 Filed 16 December 2022 REBECCA HARPER; AMY CLARE OSEROFF; DONALD RUMPH; JOHN ANTHONY BALLA; RICHARD R. CREWS; LILY NICOLE QUICK; GETTYS COHEN, JR.; SHAWN RUSH; JACKSON THOMAS DUNN, JR.; MARK S. PETERS; KATHLEEN BARNES; VIRGINIA WALTERS BRIEN; and DAVID DWIGHT BROWN v. REPRESENTATIVE DESTIN HALL, in his official c
Harper v. Hallpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCSC-121 No. 413PA21 Filed 16 December 2022 REBECCA HARPER; AMY CLARE OSEROFF; DONALD RUMPH; JOHN ANTHONY BALLA; RICHARD R. CREWS; LILY NICOLE QUICK; GETTYS COHEN, JR.; SHAWN RUSH; JACKSON THOMAS DUNN, JR.; MARK S. PETERS; KATHLEEN BARNES; VIRGINIA WALTERS BRIEN; and DAVID DWIGHT BROWN v. REPRESENTATIVE DESTIN HALL, in his official c
Harper v. Hallpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 413PA21-2 Filed 28 April 2023 REBECCA HARPER; AMY CLARE OSEROFF; DONALD RUMPH; JOHN ANTHONY BALLA; RICHARD R. CREWS; LILY NICOLE QUICK; GETTYS COHEN, JR.; SHAWN RUSH; JACKSON THOMAS DUNN, JR.; MARK S. PETERS; KATHLEEN BARNES; VIRGINIA WALTERS BRIEN; DAVID DWIGHT BROWN v. REPRESENTATIVE DESTIN HALL, in his official capacity as Chair of the House Standing Committe
Harper v. Hallpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCSC-17 No. 413PA21 Filed 14 February 2022 REBECCA HARPER; AMY CLARE OSEROFF; DONALD RUMPH; JOHN ANTHONY BALLA; RICHARD R. CREWS; LILY NICOLE QUICK; GETTYS COHEN, JR.; SHAWN RUSH; JACKSON THOMAS DUNN, JR.; MARK S. PETERS; KATHLEEN BARNES; VIRGINIA WALTERS BRIEN; and DAVID DWIGHT BROWN v. REPRESENTATIVE DESTIN HALL, in his official
Harper v. Hallpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCSC-17 No. 413PA21 Filed 14 February 2022 REBECCA HARPER; AMY CLARE OSEROFF; DONALD RUMPH; JOHN ANTHONY BALLA; RICHARD R. CREWS; LILY NICOLE QUICK; GETTYS COHEN, JR.; SHAWN RUSH; JACKSON THOMAS DUNN, JR.; MARK S. PETERS; KATHLEEN BARNES; VIRGINIA WALTERS BRIEN; and DAVID DWIGHT BROWN v. REPRESENTATIVE DESTIN HALL, in his official
Newland v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.public domain
744 N.E.2d 902 (2001) Gary A. NEWLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BUDGET RENT-A-CAR SYSTEMS, INC., Budget Rent-A-Car Corporation, and Bargain Auto Rental, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 1-99-1798. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Sixth Division. February 2, 2001. *903 Daniel A. Edelman, Cathleen M. Combs, James O. Latt
ACCEPTED 15-24-00084-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/7/2025 1:12 PM NO. 15-24-00084-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCMF-XX-XXXXXXX 22-SEP-2025 02:29 PM
Yorgy v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-1494V Filed: November 16, 2021 PUBLISHED HANNAH YORGY, Special Master Horner Petitioner, v.
Progressive Direct Ins. Co. v. Rivicciopublic domain
Progressive Direct Ins. Co. v Riviccio (2021 NY Slip Op 00317) Progressive Direct Ins. Co. v Riviccio 2021 NY Slip Op 00317 Decided on January 20, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State L
Rosscer Craig Tucker, II v. Lizabeth Thomaspublic domain
TRACY CHRISTOPHER, Justice, en banc dissenting. Recognizing that no statute permits a judgment for attorney’s fees as child support in a non-enforcement modification suit, the majority changes the question to whether any statute prohibits this award. Because the legislature has not expressly prohibited the taxation of attorney’s fees as child support in the modification context, the majority concludes t
Matter of Aden HH. v. Charish GG.public domain
Matter of Aden HH. v Charish GG. (2024 NY Slip Op 01846) Matter of Aden HH. v Charish GG. 2024 NY Slip Op 01846 Decided on April 4, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judic
KHIRY COSEY ON BEHALF * NO. 2019-CA-0756 OF HER MINOR CHILDREN, CORBIN HILLIARD AND * ALLYSSA HILLIARD COURT OF APPEAL INDIVIDUALLY AND ON * BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF FOURTH CIRCUIT REGINALD HILLIARD, JR; * TIARA LIGGINS ON BEHALF STATE OF LOUISIANA OF HER MINOR CHILD, ******* TAKHIREE HILLIARD INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF REGINALD HILLIARD, JR.; TUKEYA JARVIS INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF T
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 24-2968 ____________ NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORP., Appellant v. SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; ADMINISTRATOR CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Alan Wilsonpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1369 PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC, on behalf of itself, its patients, and its physicians and staff; GREENVILLE WOMEN’S CLINIC, on behalf of itself, its patients, and its physicians and staff; TERRY L. BUFFKIN, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, Plaintiffs - Appelle
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Alan Wilsonpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1369 PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC, on behalf of itself, its patients, and its physicians and staff; GREENVILLE WOMEN’S CLINIC, on behalf of itself, its patients, and its physicians and staff; TERRY L. BUFFKIN, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, Plaintiffs - Appelle
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 24-1819 ____________ ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP; ASTRAZENECA AB, Appellants v. SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; ADMINISTRATOR CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES _______
Lawrence v. Clubcorp NV II, LLCpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:Lawrence v Clubcorp NV II, LLC Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr
State v. Escobedopublic domain
[Cite as State v. Escobedo, 2023-Ohio-3410.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WOOD COUNTY State of Ohio/City of Bowling Green Court of Appeals Nos. WD-23-009 WD-23-010 Appellee Trial Court Nos. 22CRB01477