Cases

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Manuel Granados-Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Granados-Garcia has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Granados-Gar-cia’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. A

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Enrique Marquez Sanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 886 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Sanchez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

DUHÉ, Circuit Judge: Defendants Alvaro Narviz-Guerra (“Nar-viz”) and Larry Grant (“Grant”) were tried and convicted for possession of marijuana with the intent to distribute, conspiracy to possess marijuana, conspiracy to launder monetary instruments, and engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise. Narviz appeals his conviction arguing insufficiency of the evidence, lack of ve

942 F.Supp. 80 (1996) Margarita SERAPION, Plaintiff, v. Fred H. MARTINEZ, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 93-1790(SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 24, 1996. Judith Berkan, Río Piedras, PR and Rosalinda Pesquera, Elias, Dávila & Baez, Hato Rey, PR, for Plaintiff. Alvaro R. Calderón, Jr., Hato Rey, PR, for Defendants.

234 F.Supp.2d 1275 (2002) Honorable Mayor Raul L. MARTINEZ, Bishop Victor T. Curry, Hattie D. Harden, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, Inc., Robert Pope, James O. Brown, State Senator Betty Holzendorf, Dr. Carl Warren, State Representative Denise Lee, State Representative Gary Siplin, State Representative Matthew Meadows, State Representative, Dorothy Bendross-Mindingall, Rev. Richard P. Dunn, III, Enid Pinkney, Jacqui Colyer, Alexander Ke

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER E. THOMAS BOYLE, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the court is the plaintiffs’ motion for certification of a collective action, pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and for class certification, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants do not oppose the plaintiffs’ motion for collective

665 F.Supp.2d 1307 (2009) Miguel Angel Sanchez OSORIO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DOLE FOOD COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Case No.: 07-22693-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. October 20, 2009. *1311 Aaron Samuel Podhurst, Ramon Alvaro Rasco, Ricardo M. Martinez-CID, Steven Craig Marks, Carolina Maharbiz, Joel Douglas Ea

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER E. THOMAS BOYLE, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the court is the plaintiffs’ motion to amend their Summons and Complaint a second time to include six additional plaintiffs and five additional defendants. Defendants oppose plaintiffs’ motion on the grounds that it is futile and that permitting the amendment would prejudice defendants. For the following reasons, p

678 F.Supp.2d 89 (2010) Antonio GARCIA, Jose Amaya, Neptali Amaya, on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff(s), v. PANCHO VILLA'S OF HUNTINGTON VILLAGE, INC., Pancho Villa's of Huntington Station, Inc., Villa's Pancho Inc., Pancho Villa's of Glen Cove, Inc., Agostino Abbatvello, an individual and Abostino Abbatvello, Jr., an individual, Defendant(s). No. CV 09-486(SJF)(ETB). <

ACCEPTED 04-15-00005-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 6/24/2015 1:15:13 AM

877 F.Supp. 779 (1995) In re DUPONT-BENLATE LITIGATION. No. 92-2363 (JAF). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 7, 1995. *780 Patricia Garrity-Walkmaster, Jimenez, Graffam & Lausell, San Juan, PR, Susana Cortina-de-Cardenas, Hato Rey, PR, for plaintiffs Luis Rico-Lopez, Lillian Davidowitz-Rodriguez, wife of Luis Ric

348 F.Supp.2d 1112 (2004) J. DOE, Plaintiff, v. Alvaro RAFAEL SARAVIA; and Does 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. No. CIV-F-03-6249. United States District Court, E.D. California. November 24, 2004. *1117 Nicholas W. Van Aelstyn, Heller, Ehrman, White and McAuliffe, Matthew James Eisenbrandt, Center for Justice and Accountability, San

ORDER CEREZO, District Judge. The Court has before it the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by the Enron defendants requesting dismissal of Civil Action 98-1519 (docket entry 1550), the opposition filed by plaintiff Integrand Assurance Company (docket entry 1611), and the Enron defendants’ reply (docket entry 1670). The dismissal request is based on the contention that the one year period for filing

534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder

512 F.Supp.2d 1012 (2007) DTEX, LLC, Plaintiff, v. BBVA BANCOMER, S.A., Defendant. Civil Action No. H-06-0188. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. April 9, 2007. *1013 I. Faison Hicks, Parker Poe et al., Charlotte, NC, Kevin A. Dunlap, Parker Poe Adams Bernstein LLP, Spartanburg, SC, Suzanna Caroline Bonha

508 F.3d 785 (2007) DTEX, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BBVA BANCOMER, S.A.; Grupo Financiero BBVA Bancomer; Institucion De Banca Multiple, Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-20364 Summary Calendar. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. November 21, 2007. Revised November 26, 2007. *786 Kevin Augustus Dunlap, P

YANEZ, Justice, dissenting. Although I concur with the majority with respect to legal sufficiency of the evidence, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion as to the factual sufficiency of the evidence supporting the verdict. In my view, the greát weight and preponderance of the evidence demonstrated that appellant was legally insane at the time of the shootings, and that the verdict is manifestly

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SIDNEY B. BROOKS, Bankruptcy Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .690 II. Summary.691 A. A Summary of this Opinion.691 B. The Enactment of 11 U.S.C. § 110 in the Reform Act of 1994 .692 C. The 2005 Amendments .693 D. The Unintended Consequences of 11 U.S.C. § 110.694

123 F.Supp.2d 1223 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Manuel Guillermo CARRILLO, a/k/a "Psycho," a/k/a "Memo," Hector Hinojosa Gonzalez, a/k/a "Hector Hinojosa," a/k/a "Antonio Rameroz," a/k/a "Manuel Gonzalez," Raul Atayde, a/k/a "Bam Bam," Andres Jaquin Luna III, a/k/a "Buddha," Emiliano Zapata Licon, a/k/a "Zap," Roger Jiron, Juan Castorena, a/k/a "Chuco," Augustine Olivas, a/k/a "Chucky," Oscar Pacheco-Vasquez, a/k/a "Loco," Jose

947 F.Supp. 1021 (1996) Dwight Dwayne ADANANDUS, Petitioner, v. Gary JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Respondent. Civil No. SA-95-CA-415. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. August 27, 1996. Order Denying Amendment September 19, 1996. *1022