Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Alvarez v. Bondi”
Alvarez Mendoza v. Bondipublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 24-1112, 24-1260 JOSE RENE ALVAREZ MENDOZA, Petitioner, v. PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, Respondent. PETITIONS FOR REVIEW OF ORDERS OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS
Genovevo Alvarez Ronquillo v. Pamela Bondipublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1324 Doc: 68 Filed: 08/15/2025 Pg: 1 of 13 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1324 GENOVEVO ALVAREZ RONQUILLO, Petitioner, v. PAMELA JO BONDI, Attorney General, Responde
Shaarbay v. Alvarezpublic domain
PER CURIAM. *488Affirmed. See § 61.14(6)(a)3., Fla. Stat. (2017) ("The judgment under this paragraph is a final judgment as to any unpaid payment or installment of support which has accrued up to the time either party files a motion with the court to alter or modify the support order, and such judgment may not be modified by the court.
Alvarez v. Statepublic domain
LAGOA, J. The Petitioner, Juan Alvarez (“Alvarez”), seeks a belated petition pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c). Because the petition requires a determination of a disputed fact, we appoint a commissioner to hold an eviden-tiary hearing and determine the limited, disputed issue of fact that remains. The petition shall be held in abeyan
Alvarez v. Statepublic domain
Per Curiam. Appellant challenges on appeal the revocation of her probation and the resulting judgment and sentence for the original offenses of organized fraud and fraudulent use of a credit card. The order revoking probation is remanded for correction of a clerical error regarding admissions by Appellant. The corrected order should reflect that Appellant was found in willful violation of her probation for failure to
Alvarez Fuentes v. Statepublic domain
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EMAS, J. We grant appellant’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our previous opinion, and substitute the following opinion in its stead. Appellant, Miguel Alexander Alvarez Fuentes, appeals from the trial court’s order adjudging him in violation of his probation, revoking his probation, and sentencing him to a
Alvarez v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. We reverse the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for postconviction relief and remand this matter for further proceedings consistent with Falcon v. *208State, 162 So.3d 954 (Fla.2015), and Horsley v. State, 160 So.3d 393 (Fla.2015). DAMOORGIAN, C.J., CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur. </
Alvarez v. Statepublic domain
On Motion For Rehearing CIKLIN, J. We deny appellee’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our previously issued opinion, and substitute the following in its place. The defendant, Robert Alvarez, and the co-defendant, Darnell Razz, were tried by one jury and each convicted of two counts of first-degree murder with a firearm while masked and one count of robbery with a firearm whil
Alvarez v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. Lemuel Alvarez timely appeals his conviction by jury verdict for one count of aggravated battery with a firearm,1 also challenging the trial judge’s denial of his 3.800(b)(2) motion to correct sentencing *970errors, which addressed several cost issues. As the State concedes, the $20 assessment imposed pursuant to the “Crime S
Alvarez v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722, 722-23 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding “section 89.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional,” and rejecting Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289, 1308 (M.D.Fla.2011), in which federal court held section 893.13, Florida Statutes (2004), “violates the due process clause and that th
Alvarez v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).
Alvarez v. Statepublic domain
WARNER, J. In this appeal from his conviction for false imprisonment and assault, appellant claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to substitute counsel. Because the trial court made no inquiry of appellant and gave no reason for denying the motion for substitution and the short continuance requested so that private counsel could appear, the trial court abused its discretion. We therefore reverse.
Alvarez v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. We affirm, without discussion, Alvarez’s convictions for trespass and dealing in stolen property. However, we reverse his conviction for grand theft1 because the State’s evidence was insufficient to establish that the stolen items had a value of $300 or more. See Smith v. State, 955 So.2d 1227, 1229 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (State required to present competent evidence to prove va
PER CURIAM: Proceeding pro se, Plaintiff Alfred Alvarez sued more than a dozen defendants. Plaintiff moved to proceed in forma pau-peris, and the district court granted the motion. The district court dismissed Plaintiffs claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), which permits a district court to dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint sua sponte if the complaint fails to state a cla
Shaarbay v. Department of Revenue ex rel. Alvarezpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that, given the presumption of correctness of the trial court’s ruling, where no transcript is provided to appellate court, then appellate court is unable to *1128determine whether the evidence supports the trial court’s judgment).
Alvarez v. Attorney General for Fla.public domain
679 F.3d 1257 (2012) Carl Robert ALVAREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR the State of FLORIDA, State Attorney for the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida, Defendants-Appellees. No. 11-10699. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. May 8, 2012. *1258 Marcia J. Silvers, Marcia J. Silvers, PA, Miami, FL, f
Gonzalez-Juarez v. Bondipublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LUIS GUILLERMO GONZALEZ- No. 21-927 JUAREZ, Agency No. A201-173-391 Petitioner, v. OPINION PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order o
Sandoval Argueta v. Bondipublic domain
Case: 23-60080 Document: 177-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/09/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-60080 ____________ FILE
Garcia Pinach v. Bondipublic domain
22-6421(L) Garcia Pinach v. Bondi In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2024 Nos. 22-6421 (L), 24-26 (CON) JOAQUIN GARCIA PINACH, Petitioner, v. PAMELA BONDI, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GE
Javi Porter v. Pamela Bondipublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0029p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT JAVI PORTER, ┐ Petitioner, │