Cases

Slip Op. 18-96 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ALUMINUM EXTRUSIONS FAIR TRADE COMMITTEE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Chief Judge Defendant, Court No. 17-00179 and INNOVATIVE OUTDOOR SOLUTIONS, INC., D

OPINION Stanceu, Chief Judge: Plaintiff Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee (“AEFTC”) contests an August 7, 2014 final determination of the International Trade Administration, United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or “the Department”), in which Commerce .ruled that “aluminum

OPINION POGUE, Chief Judge: In this action, the Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee (“AEFTC”) challenges two aspects of the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce” or the “Department”) definition of the products excluded from Anti-Dumping (“AD”) and Countervailing Duty (“CVD”) orders on aluminum extrusions from the People’s Republic of

Opinion & Order CARMAN, Judge: This matter comes before the Court following the U.S. Department' of Commerce’s (“Commerce” or “Defendant”) determination in Antidumping (AD) and Countervailing Duty (CVD) Orders: Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China (PRC): Final Scope Ruling on Side Mount Valve Controls

*1329 MEMORANDUM and ORDER DONALD C. POGUE, Chief Judge. Upon consideration of Defendant-Intervenor’s, Aavid Thermalloy, LLC (“Aavid”), and Defendant’s motions to dismiss, any responses thereto, and the record as a whole, it is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant’s

LOURIE, Circuit Judge. Capella Sales & Services Ltd. (“Capella”) appeals from the decisions of the United States Court of International Trade (the “Trade Court”), dismissing Capella’s two separate complaints under USCIT Rule 12(b)(6). Capella Sales & Servs. Ltd. v. United States, 180 F.Supp.3d 1293, 1303-04 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2016)

Slip Op. No. 23-5 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ALUMINUM EXTRUSIONS FAIR TRADE COMMITTEE, Plaintiff, v. Before: Stephen Alexander Vaden, UNITED STATES, Judge Defendant, Court No. 1:21-cv-00253 and REFLECTION WINDOW + WALL, LLC,

Slip Op. 12-129 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ALUMINUM EXTRUSIONS FAIR TRADE COMMITTEE, Plaintiff, Before: Judith M. Barzilay, Senior Judge v. Court No. 11-00205 UNITED STATES, Public Version Defendant,

Katzmann, Judge: *1345 Can an electronic transmission -- or only snail mail -- qualify as a "mailing?" Do certain pallet products fall within the plain meaning of the scope of an order seeking to effectuate fair trade for domestic producers and industry? This case involves these jurisdict

OPINION TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge: Plaintiff, Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd., (“Zhongya”) moves for judgment on the agency record contesting Defendant United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) determination to collapse into a single entity three affiliated exporters/producers, the Guang Ya group (“Guang Ya”), Zhongya, and

OPINION POGUE, Chief Judge: This case returns to court following a remand ordered by Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co. v. United States, — CIT -, 929 F.Supp.2d 1324 (2013) (“Zhaoqing Remand ”). The Zhaoqing Remand required the Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or “the Department”) to review the pro

Opinion STANCEU, Chief Judge: Plaintiffs Kam Kiu Aluminum Products Sdn. Bhd. and Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminum Extrusion Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Kam Kiu”) challenge a final determination (“Scope Ruling”) by the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or the “Department”) that certain merchandise exported

Slip Op. 25-44 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE U.S. ALUMINUM EXTRUDERS COALITION and UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, Plaintiffs, Before: Lisa W. Wang, Judge v. Court No. 23-00270 UNITED STATES, Defendant, and

Slip Op. No. 20-129 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE COLUMBIA ALUMINUM PRODUCTS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Chief Judge Defendant, Court No. 19-00013 and ALUMINUM EXTRUSIONS FAIR TRADE COMMITTEE AND ENDURA

Choe-Groves, Judge: Plaintiff Agilent Technologies ("Agilent"), a manufacturer of electronic and bio-analytical measurement instruments, challenges a scope ruling on Agilent's mass filter radiator issued by the U.S. Department of Commerce ("Department" or "Commerce"). Before the court are the results of redetermination on remand filed by Commerce pursuant to the court's prior opinio

Stanceu, Chief Judge: This litigation arose from a challenge to a decision (the "Final Scope Ruling") of the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce ("Commerce" or the "Department") interpreting the scope of an antidumping duty order and a countervailing duty order on certain aluminum extrusions from the People's Republic of China ("China").

OPINION AND ORDER Choe-Groves, Judge: Plaintiff Agilent Technologies, Inc. (“Agilent” or “Plaintiff’) is a manüfacturer of electronic and bio-analytical measurement instruments who brought this action challenging the scope ruling on Agilent’s mass filter radiator (“MFR”) issued by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Department” or “Commerce”). See Summo

Opinion concurring-in-part, dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge Reyna. Prost, Chief Judge. Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee ("AEFTC") appeals a decision from the U.S. Court of International Trade ("the CIT") affirming a scope ruling of the U.S. Department of Commerce. The scope ruling held that Whirlpool Corporation's kitchen appliance door handles w

Stanceu, Chief Judge: This litigation arose from a challenge to an administrative determination by the International Trade Administration, United States Department of Commerce ("Commerce" or the "Department"), that certain imported appliance door handles fall within the scope of antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain aluminum extrusions from the People's Republic of Chi

OPINION Stanceu, Chief Judge: Plaintiff Whirlpool Corporation (“Whirlpool”) challenged a 2014 decision of the International Trade Administration, United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or the “Department”) interpreting the scope of antidumping and countervailing duty orders on aluminum extrusions from China to include two types of kitchen appli