Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Altland v. Altland”
Wright v. Altlandpublic domain
OPINION PER CURIAM. Shaun Wright, proceeding pro se, appeals an order of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee Scott Altland, a Sprin-gettsbury Township police officer, in his civil rights action. Wright was charged with two robberies in 2005; a bank robbery and the robbery of a Hardee’s restaurant. He was later acquitted
Wright v. Altlandpublic domain
OPINION PER CURIAM. Shaun Wright, proceeding pro se, appeals an order of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee Scott Altland, a Sprin-gettsbury Township police officer, in his civil rights action. Wright was charged with two robberies in 2005; a bank robbery and the robbery of a Hardee’s restaurant. He was later acquitted
Bailey v. Altlandpublic domain
ERB, J., Defendant Robert Altland, M.D., (hereinafter defendant) has filed preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to plaintiffs’ malpractice action against him, which is before the court for consideration. Plaintiffs filed an action in assumpsit and trespass against defendant and several drug manufacturers *446and distributors, alleging tha
Commonwealth v. Altlandpublic domain
OPINION PER CURIAM: Judgment of sentence affirmed. O’BRIEN, C.J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Altland v. Sprenklepublic domain
57 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 548 (1981) Mervin C. Altland and Laura Altland, Appellants v. David Sprenkle, Norman Lau and Ervin Linehart, as Supervisors of Jackson Township and Sterling Bentzel, as Zoning Officer of Jackson Township, Appellees. No. 253 C.D. 1980. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued February 2, 1981. March 17, 1981.
Commonwealth ex rel. Altland v. Myerspublic domain
Order affirmed.
Commonwealth v. Altlandpublic domain
Opinion by Porter, J., We have here appeals by the defendants, respectively, from their conviction in the court below upon an indictment in which they were jointly charged with conspiracy to cheat and defraud Aaron F. Altland, Reilly Bros, and Raub and others. The defendants were jointly tried in the court below and their several appeals may properly be disposed of by one opinion. John H. Altland was the keeper o
Morrison v. Altlandpublic domain
Opinion by Linn, J., In this suit by a landlord against his tenant to re= cover money paid for the tenant’s account, money loaned, for work performed, for materials furnished, for the value of produce retained by the tenant and for loss sustained because the tenant refused to feed cattle, the tenant sought to set off, among other items, one-half the amount received by the landlord for the sale of cer
Hutton v. Altlandpublic domain
Per Curiam, This appeal is from an order opening a judgment entered upon a note alleged to have been given by a mother to her daughter. In view of the testimony offered in support of the application to open the judgment — a recital of which would serve no good purpose — the court below would have clearly erred if it had not granted the relief prayed for; and this is all that need be said in answer to the complaint of the appel
Dœpfner v. State ex rel. Altlandpublic domain
Per Curiam. Doepfner was a justice of the peace, and the other appellant, Rhodius, was the security on his official bond. Altland was a constable, and had in his hands several executions, the return day of which had passed, and on some of which he had collected or received money, which executions had been issued by Dcepfner, on judgments on his docket. Altland called at the office of Doepfner, and returned one of the executions o
Altland v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.public domain
Mr. Justice Freeman delivered the opinion of the court. The first of the grounds upon which defendant seeks to have the judgment of the Municipal Court reversed is that the bond and agreement executed by the plaintiff and in part set forth in the foregoing statement, are agreements to indemnify and save harmless the defendant against any liability, claim or suit arising out o
In re Altlandpublic domain
WlSSLER, J., In this case a petition was presented on December 5, 1941, to the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County by Emmett E. Alt-land praying that the court adjudge Aaron F. Altland to be unable to take care of his property and appoint a guardian for his estate. On January 6, 1942, E. A. Tapper! presented a petition to the court for leave to intervene, stating that he is a creditor of the said Aaron F. Altland by reason
Moyer v. Berks County Board of Assessment Appealspublic domain
803 A.2d 833 (2002) Ray W. MOYER and Clara L. Moyer, Appellants, v. BERKS COUNTY BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS. Ray W. Moyer and Clara L. Moyer v. Berks County Board of Assessment Appeals, Appellant. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 9, 2002. Decided June 28, 2002. *835 P. Daniel Altland, Harrisburg, for
Corbett v. Scranton School Districtpublic domain
557 Pa. 118 (1999) 731 A.2d 1287 Joann CORBETT, Carmel Buratti, John Bewick and Gail Thompson, Appellants, v. SCRANTON SCHOOL DISTRICT and Scranton Federation of Teachers, Appellees. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued February 1, 1999. Decided June 24, 1999. *119 A. Martin Herring, Philadelphia, for app
Corbett v. Scranton School Districtpublic domain
LEADBETTER, Judge. Scranton School District (the District) and Scranton Federation of Teachers (the Federation) (collectively, appellants) appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County entering summary judgment in favor of Ms. Corbett, Ms. Buratti, Mr. Bewick and Ms. Thompson (the Teachers). At issue is whether the phrase “any provision of a collective bargaining agreement in effect on February 4, 1982
Purdy v. Romeopublic domain
SMITH, Judge. Marilyn and Frank Purdy appeal an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County sustaining preliminary objections and dismissing all counts of their amended complaint against Colonial Northampton Intermediate Unit #20 and *283Delaware Valley School District (collectively Employers) and further dismissing two counts of the amended complaint pertaini
Sanderson v. Frank S. Bryan, M.D., Ltd.public domain
TAMILIA, Judge: Robert L. Sanderson and Ñola L. Sanderson, his wife, take this appeal from the August 10, 1990, judgment in favor of appellee, Frank S. Bryan, M.D., against whom appellants had brought suit alleging medical malpractice and lack of informed consent. In the spring of 1979 appellant/Robert, who suffered from back pain, was referred by his family physician to appellee, an orthopedic surgeon. When
Sanguigni v. Pittsburgh Board of Public Educationpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT ALITO, Circuit Judge: Phyllis J. Sanguigni, a public high school teacher, filed this action against the school board and various school officials, alleging that she had lost her coaching positions and had been penalized in other ways for publishing certain statements in a faculty newsletter. She asserted First Amendment and due process claims, as well as pendent state claims. The district c
Keiper v. Mack Truckpublic domain
McGINLEY, J., The matter before the court is the petition of Roadway Express Inc., the employer of plaintiff, to intervene in the within matter. The issue presented is whether the operation of an air conditioning unit in a motor vehicle is the “use” of a motor vehicle such that the Motor Vehicle Responsibility Act (75 Pa.C.S. §1720 et seq.) bars the intervention of the employer to protect his workmen’s compensation subro
Brown v. Department of Correctionpublic domain
KELLEY, Judge. James Brown, William Lucas, Robert Altland, Tony Hugar and Chris Jordan (prisoners) bring this suit in our original jurisdiction alleging that the Department of Corrections (DOC) lacked the authority to transfer the prisoners to a federal institution.1 The prisoners argue that because the transfer was in violation of both federal constitutional rights and state law, their sentences h