Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THE BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, Plaintiff, Case No. 21-CV-0166 (CRC) v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Gun violence plagues the United States, claiming countless innoc

2023 IL App (4th) 230509 FILED NOS. 4-23-0509, 4-23-0510, 4-23-0511 November 3, 2023 Carla Bender IN THE APPELLATE COURT 4th District Appellate

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JULIE A. ROBINSON, District Judge. Plaintiff Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence (“Brady Campaign”) brings *1089this lawsuit seeking declaratory and in-junctive relief against Kansas Governor Sam Brownback, Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt, and all other persons acting on behalf of the state of Kansas (co

OSTRER, J.A.D. *30Plaintiffs Wanda Broach-Butts and the estate of her late husband, Theotis (Ted) Butts, allege that defendant Therapeutic Alternatives, Inc., a private social service agency, negligently placed a troubled and dangerous child, D.M., then over fourteen years old, in the therapeutic foster home Wanda and Ted operated, and failed to

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-2130 (RDM) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, and BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Brady Center to Preve

MEMORANDUM Hon. John E. Jones, III, District Judge Presently before the Court are the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment, and the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Docs. 27, 29. For the reasons that follow, the Court will deny the Plaintiffs’ motion in its entirety and grant Defendants’ motion for Summary Judgment. 1. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

612 F.Supp.2d 1 (2009) BRADY CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth L. SALAZAR, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, et al., Defendants. National Parks Conservation Association, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth L. Salazar, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, et al., Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 08-2243 (CKK), 09-013(CKK). United S

ORDER RICHARD L. BOURGEOIS, JR., UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Before the court is Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Subpoena Duces Tecum Production (R. Doc. 38) filed on January 26, 2016. The motion is opposed. (R. Doc. 40). Plaintiff has filed a supplemental memorandum providing deposition testimony. (R. Doc. 51). Also before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Modify Subpo

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA FAMILY VIOLENCE APPELLATE PROJECT et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY et al., Respondents. S288176 August 10, 2026 Chief Justice Guerrero authored the opinion of the Court, in which Justices Corrigan, Liu, Kruger, Groban, Evans, and Lie* concurred. * As

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA REPUBLIC OF THE GAMBIA, Petitioner, v. Miscellaneous Action No. 20-36 (JEB) FACEBOOK, INC., Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Republic of The Gambia is currently prosecuting in the International Court of Justice a case of genocide against Myanmar for its treatment of the

RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0755-16T2 WANDA BROACH-BUTTS, Administratrix of the Estate of THEOTIS BUTTS, deceased, and WANDA BROACH-BUTTS, in her own right, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION

49 F.Supp.2d 3 (1999) CENTER TO PREVENT HANDGUN VIOLENCE, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A.96-1590 (JR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 29, 1999. *4 Thomas S. Williamson, Jr., Ivan K. Fong, Christopher N. Sipes, Kurt G. Calia, Covington & Burling, Washingt

Case Number: 01-05-01187-CV 08/31/2007 Case stored in record room 08/06/2007 Motion for Rehearing - Disposed proceeding denied 07/23/2007 Motion for Rehearing of Motion for Extension of Time 07/23/2007 Notice requesting filing fee 07/23/2007 Appendix to any instrument 07/06/2007 Motion for Extension of Time disposed. proceeding denied 07/06/2007 Second m/e/t to file petition for review disposed proceeding denied 07/06/2007 M/E/T to file petition for review disposed proceeding denied 06/04/200

339 F.Supp.2d 68 (2004) BRADY CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE UNITED WITH THE MILLION MOM MARCH, Plaintiff, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 04-454(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 10, 2004. *69 *70 Dani

Based on the foregoing analysis and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss the first cause of action, (Dkt. 9), is GRANTED .

520 F.3d 226 (2008) PEOPLE AGAINST POLICE VIOLENCE; Thomas Merton Center; National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Pittsburgh Branch v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Appellant. No. 06-4457. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued December 11, 2007. Opinion Filed March 17, 2008. *227

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-13589 TRACEY ANNE SPICUZZA & others1 vs. COMMONWEALTH & another.2 FREEDOM TO PROTE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ASYLUM SEEKERS TRYING TO ASSURE THEIR SAFETY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:23-cv-163-RCL PATRICK “P.J.” LECHLEITNER, in his official capacity as Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM O

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE PRESS COALITION’S MOTION Miscellaneous Action No. 21-87 (BAH) FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO SET ASIDE STANDING ORDER NO. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell 21-28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is a petition submitted on behalf of fifteen media organizations (“the P

Brown, J. ¶1 H.O. appeals the termination of her parental rights over B.P. H.O. contends substantial evidence does not support the court’s findings that (1) all necessary services were expressly and understandably offered or provided her, (2) little likelihood existed to remedy conditions so B.P. could be returned to her in the near future, (3) her continued parent-child relationship diminished B.P.’s prospects for early integra