Cases

274 S.W.3d 277 (2008) Robert ALPERT, Roman Alpert, and Renee Picazo, Guardian of the Estate of Daniel Alpert, A Minor, Appellants, v. Mark RILEY, Individually and as Trustee, Appellee. Nos. 01-06-00605-CV, 01-06-00505-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). October 23, 2008. Rehearing Overruled January 15, 2009.

10 F.Supp.2d 290 (1998) UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, The Bank of New York, and The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., as trustees of certain unit investment trusts, Plaintiffs, v. Steven L. ALPERT, et al., and Isaac T. Avery, Jr. et al., and Dale D. Ackerman, et al., Defendants. INVESTORS FIDUCIARY TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee of the Kemper Tax-Exempt Income Trust, Plaintiff, v. Janet C. JENNER, et al., and Thomas B. Bachhuber, et a

Corrected opinion on rehearing issued October 23, 2008 Corrected opinion on rehearing issued October 23, 2008

430 F.Supp.2d 682 (2006) Martin ALPERT, et al., Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 1:04 CV 383. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. February 28, 2006. J. Timothy Bender, Joseph P. Alexander, Rotatori Bender Gragel Stoper Alexander, Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiffs. Karen A. Smith, David M. Steiner, Nicole M. Bielawski,

Plaintiffs-appellants, Martin Alpert and Click Technologies, Inc., appeal from the dismissal of their declaratory judgment/injunctive relief action against defendants-appellees, Kodee Technologies and John J. House ("House" collectively), by the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County.1 Appellants submit that the *Page 798 dismissal with prejudice was unwarranted, as Ohio's long-arm statute and controlling Civil

ALPERT, Judge. This is an appeal in which the appellant contends that first the District Court and then the circuit court erred in refusing to allow him to subpoena the State’s toxicologist as a witness in the appellant’s trial on charges of driving while intoxicated. We conclude that the appellant’s argument is without merit, and accordingly affirm the Circuit Court for Worcester County.

757 F.Supp. 267 (1991) Jeff J. WHITE, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Andrew J. MELTON, Jr., Charles A. Fiumefreddo, Sheldon Curtis, Arthur D. Forster, Kenton J. Hinchliffe, Bruce N. Alpert, Dean Witter Government Securities Plus, Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. and Dean Witter Financial Services, Inc., Defendants. 90 Civ. 0498 (SWK). United States District Court,

206 F.Supp.2d 1280 (2001) Shanie ALPERT, Plaintiff, v. DEKALB OFFICE ENVIRONMENTS, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 1:00-CV-283-TWT. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. April 25, 2001. *1281 Shanie Alpert, Roswell, GA, pro se. Randy C. Gepp, Arrington & Hollowell, Atlanta, GA, for defendant. <

Barnes, Presiding Judge. *94 The plaintiffs, Shirley and Nile Wingler, were injured when a speeding car driven by a suspect who was fleeing law enforcement crashed into their car. They sued the sheriffs of Lamar and Monroe Counties in their official capacities (the "Lamar Sheriff" and "Monroe S

643 F.Supp. 1406 (1986) George ALPERT and Lee Wolfman v. Susan THOMAS. Civ. A. No. 85-143. United States District Court, D. Vermont. September 8, 1986. *1407 *1408 Jessel Rothman, Mineola, N.Y., Albert A. Raphael, Jr., Waitsfield, Vt., for plaintiffs. Robert D. Rachlin, Downs, Rachlin &

629 P.2d 878 (1981) 52 Or.App. 815 STATE of Oregon, Appellant, v. Spencer Ward ALPERT, Respondent. No. 10-80-03817; CA 19032. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted February 11, 1981. Decided June 15, 1981. *879 Richard David Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause f

Beasley, Judge. Wickes sued Leonard Alpert d/b/a Alpert Imports for conversion. It alleged that Wickes had purchased $30,200 worth of dining tables and chairs from KFK Industrial Company, Ltd., in Taipei, Taiwan; that KFK had shipped the furniture to the port of Los Angeles; that the furniture was picked up at Los Angeles harbor by Giant Transportation, Inc., and shipped to Department Store Consolidators in Commerce, Califor

Per Curiam Opinion In this case, we must decide—initially—whether there is any mechanism for this Court to review the fundamental fairness of a proceeding conducted by the Commission on Judicial Disabilities (“Commission”) when the Commission disciplines a judge in the sole manner in which the Constitution autho

OPINION OF THE COURT Smith, J. These consolidated actions arise out of investments made by plaintiffs-appellants George Alpert (Alpert) and Lee Wolfman (Wolfman) in a tax shelter known as the Logan Properties Program (Logan) and the issuance of tax opinions by the defendant law firms in connection therewith. On December 30, 1977 Alpert and Wolfman, who were facing substantial income ta

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ <

MOYLAN, Judge. The appellant, Sean Julian White, was convicted by a Wi-comico County jury, presided over by Judge D. William Simpson, of 1) the importation of cocaine into Maryland, 2) the possession of cocaine with intent to distribute it, 3) conspiracy to import cocaine into Maryland, and 4) conspiracy to possess cocaine with the intent to distribute it. On this appeal, he raised the three contentions

870 A.2d 1241 (2005) 161 Md. App. 483 Christina WHITE v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION. No. 2645, September Term, 2003. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. April 1, 2005. Jeffrey M. Ross (Keith J. Zimmerman, on brief), Baltimore, for appellant. Kimberly Smith Ward (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., on brief), for appellee.

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), entered December 14, 1998, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgmen

PER CURIAM. By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date of March 22, 1966. We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A. Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that

451 S.E.2d 916 (1994) FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK OF BRUNSWICK, Respondent, v. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, Appellant, Elinor H. Alpert, Individually and as Executrix and sole beneficiary of the Estate of Leonard I. Alpert, Debra L. Alpert, The Escrow Shoppe, Inc., a Corporation, Mary J. Butler, Individually and as the Principal Shareholder, Officer and Director of the Escrow Shoppe, Inc., Charles Houston, Esq., Ronald F. Hanswirth, Jerry L