Cases

801 F.Supp.2d 883 (2010) Richard B. FOX, Plaintiff, v. GOOD SAMARITAN L.P., et al, Defendants. No. C 04-0874 RS. United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. March 29, 2010. *885 James A. Hennefer, Hennefer & Wood, Joseph H.C. Wood, Attorney at Law, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff. Ross E. Campbel

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCMF-XX-XXXXXXX 04-OCT-2018 04:42 PM SCMF-XX-XXXXXXX SUP

*1240 WILSON, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents the challenges of private plaintiffs to various provisions of Alabama’s House Bill 56, the “Beason-Hammon Alabama Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act” (H.B. 56). Relevant to this appeal, the plaintiffs here (the HICA Plaintiffs) brought suit against def

HUDSON, Justice. Plaintiff Johnnie Wilkes appealed the opinion and award of the North Carolina Industrial Commission concluding that: (1) plaintiff failed to meet his burden of establishing that his anxiety and depression were a result of his work-related accident; and (2) plaintiff was not entitled to disability payments made after 18 January 2011. Wilkes v. City of

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEVEN W. CROWE, No. 21-15802 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:18-cv-00288- ACK-RT CHRISTINE WORMUTH, Secretary of the Army, Defendant-Appellee, OPINION RYAN D. MCCARTHY, Defendant-Appellee, and MARK

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 20, 2022 Decided July 22, 2022 No. 20-5291 HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF OREGON,  Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 06-36012 v. D.C. No. LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION,  CV-05-01443- Defendant-Appellee, REJ/PP UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OPINION Intervenor-Appellee.

Case: 19-2032 Document: 59 Page: 1 Filed: 03/09/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LAWRENCE BRENNER, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent ______________________ 2019-2032 ______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protec

ORDER DENYING THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DE­FENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUM­MARY JUDGMENT BRIMMER, District Judge. The above-entitled matter having come be­fore the Court upon the Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and the Defen­dants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, and the Court having reviewed the materials on file herein, having heard argument from

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2022 NY Slip Op 05127) Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2022 NY Slip Op 05127 Decided on September 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published

164 P.3d 851 (2007) 2007 MT 159 338 Mont. 41 The MARY J. BAKER REVOCABLE TRUST and Linda J. Ecklund, on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated persons and entities, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CENEX HARVEST STATES, COOPERATIVES, INC., and Front Range Pipeline, L.L.C., Defendants and Respondents. No. 04-333. Supreme Court of Montana.

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 324–368 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RICKY LEE EARP,  No. 03-99005 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-00-06508-R S.W. ORNOSKI, WARDEN, OF ORDER CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON AT SAN AMENDING QUENTIN,* OPINION AND Respondent

06-15-00145-CR CLERK'S RECORD Volume !_of 1 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

REVISED OCTOBER 25, 2001 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _______________ m 00-40337 _______________ MATTHEWS SMITH, JOHN COMEAUX, JOHN LUMPKINS, KENNETH FORD, AND DARLENE GREENE, ET AL.,

*546ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On June 28, 2011, Robert Briseno filed a complaint against ConAgra.1 Between October and December 2011, the court consolidated several eases filed against Co

46 Cal.4th 364 (2009) ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___ ___ P.3d ___ KAREN L. STRAUSS et al., Petitioners, v. MARK B. HORTON, as State Registrar of Vital Statistics, etc., et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. ROBIN TYLER et al., Petitioners, v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO e

Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di