Cases

Argued before Barbera, C.J., Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty, JJ. Getty, J. *798 **143 In this case, we are asked to determine whether the trial court erred in

SYKES, Circuit Judge. We are again asked to decide whether an aspect of Indiana’s alcohol regulation system violates the Equal Protection Clause. Two years, ago we upheld an *680Indiana law that prohibits grocery and convenience stores from selling chilled beer. See Indiana Petroleum Marketers & Convenience Store Ass’n v. Cook, 808 F.3d 318 (7th Cir. 2015

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. In Wyeth v. Levine, the Supreme Court held that claims against a manufacturer of a brand-namé prescription drug for failure to warn adequately of the drug’s dangers were not preempted by federal law. 555 U.S. 555

Justice GORSUCH delivered the opinion of the Court. Disruptive dinnertime calls, downright deceit, and more besides drew Congress's eye to the debt collection industry. From that scrutiny emerged the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, a statute that authorizes private lawsuits and weighty fines designed to deter wayward collection practices. So perhaps it comes as little surprise that

Tatel, Circuit Judge: *1094 For the second time, Eric Friedman, a type-one diabetic and aspiring commercial pilot, challenges the Federal Aviation Administration's refusal to grant him a medical certificate required for commercial flight. Because Friedman uses insulin to manage his blood

WINTER, Circuit Judge: Jesse Litvak appeals from his conviction, after a trial by a jury before Chief Judge Hall, on one count of securities fraud pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78ff. This is the second time this matter has been before us. In the first appeal, see *59

ORDER In the multidistrict litigation docket that gave rise to this appeal (MDL No. 2545), the district court dismissed all cases with prejudice that involved the above-named defendants, Pfizer, Inc. and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, LLC, the makers of the drug Depo-Testosterone.1 Some of the more than one thousand individual cases subject to this appeal were resolved by final jud

Wilkins, Circuit Judge: *656 Longstanding principles of administrative law teach us to give federal agencies breathing room when they make policy and "resolv[e] the struggle between competing views of the public interest." Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc. <

GANTS, C.J. *1209 **142 Under Federal law, a manufacturer of a generic drug must provide its users with a warning label that is identical to the label of the brand-name counterpart. See

WAITE, J. {¶ 1} Plaintiffs-Appellants, Estate of Beverly Ann Clay (with Elmer Clay as Administrator), Lilly May Curtis, and Mary Jane Patton (collectively "Appellants"), appeal the trial court's decision to grant summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees, Funeral Home Services Corp. ("FHS") and Shriver Allison Courtley, Company, aka Shriver-Allison-Courtley-Weller-King ("Shriv

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. For many years prior to September 2008, Minnesota businessman Thomas Petters, through his company Petters Company, Inc. ("PCI"), "purported to run a 'diverting' business that purchased electronics in bulk and resold them at high profits to major retailers." Ritchie Capital Mgmt., LLC v. Stoebner ,

01/14/2021 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 28, 2020 Session1 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROBERT JASON ALLISON Appeal by Permission from the Court of Criminal Appeals Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2010-C-2264 Mark J.

PROST, Chief Judge. Eli Lilly & Co. (“Eli Lilly”) is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 7,772,209 (“ ’209 patent”). It fried this consolidated Hatch-Wax-man suit against Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc.; APP Pharmaceuticals LLC; Pliva Hrvatska D.O.O.; Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.; and Barr Laboratories, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) to prevent Defendants from launching a ge

JUDGMENT Per Curiam This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-KA-00458-COA AARON DESHUN JONES A/K/A AARON JONES APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/17/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ROBERT B. HELFRICH COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: FORREST COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLA

04/25/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 3, 2018 MALIK JONES-SMITH v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County Nos. 13-03489, 13-03490, 13-03491, 13-03492, 13-05896, 13-05897, & 14-01647 Lee V. Coffee, Judge

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-KA-00366-COA DAE’SHON JONES A/K/A DESHAUN JONES APPELLANT A/K/A DADA v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/27/2015 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. EDDIE H. BOWEN COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JASPER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,

RUCKER, Justice. A car dealership appeals the denial of its motion to set aside default judgment. We conclude the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the dealership at the time the default was entered and therefore reverse the trial court’s judgment. Facts and Procedural History Jerramy

OPINION Opinion by Justice O’NEILL. In this interlocutory appeal from the trial courts denial of his special appearance, appellant Timothy Darrell Jones, a Tennessee resident, argues he has insufficient contacts with Texas to be subjected to the jurisdiction of a Texas court. We agree, and reverse and render judgment dismissing appelle

PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Roger K. Crosby (“Crosby Plaintiff’), as Trustee of the Crosby Group, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan (the “Plan”), and a group of Individual Retirement Account (“IRA”) holders (collectively, the “Allison Plaintiffs”), filed suit against Defendant-Appellee Bank One-Denver (“Bank One”) alleging violations of federal securities laws, Colorado securities laws, ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 11