Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
9 opinions for “Alliantgroup, L.P. v. Feingold”
Alliantgroup, L.P. v. Feingoldpublic domain
803 F.Supp.2d 610 (2011) ALLIANTGROUP, L.P., Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey FEINGOLD, Defendant. Civil Action No. H-09-0479. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 24, 2011. *614 Jeremy Maxwell Fingeret, Fingeret Frank Jadav P.C., John Thomas Simpson, Jr., Alliantgroup L.P., Houston, TX, for Plaintiff. Ch
Aaron Kaufman v. Amerihealth Laboratory, LLCpublic domain
Affirm and Opinion Filed October 30, 2020 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00504-CV AARON KAUFMAN, Appellant V. AMERIHEALTH LABORATORY, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
SwiftAir v. Southwest Airlinespublic domain
Filed 3/11/22; modified and certified for publication 4/5/22 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN SWIFTAIR, LLC, B303314 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SC122964) v. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO., Defendant and
His Co. v. Stoverpublic domain
OPINION & ORDER MELINDA HARMON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending in the above-referenced cause is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint. (Doc. 7.) Having reviewed the motion, Plaintiffs Response in Opposition (Doc. 11), and the relevant law, the Court is of the opinion that Defendant’s motion should be DENIED. I. Background The dispute in this c
Ahs Staffing, LLC v. Quest Staffing Grp., Inc.public domain
AMOS L. MAZZANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court is AHS Staffing, LLC's ("AHS") Application for a Preliminary Injunction against Defendants Quest Staffing Group, Inc. ("Quest"), Jaclyn Ward ("Ward"), Michelle Swann ("Swann"), and Sandra Dominguez ("Dominguez") (collectively, "Defendants") (Dkt. # 15). After reviewing the relevant pleadings and motion, the Court finds that the motion should be granted.
A.M. Castle & Co. v. Byrnepublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, alleging breach of employee confidentiality agreement, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, tortious interference with contract, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, and civil conspiracy, and seeking compensatory and injunctive relief against a former employee
Akerblom v. Ezra Holdings Ltd.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge. Before the Court are three Motions: Defendant Emas Subsea Services, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (“Emas Subsea’s Motion”) (Doc. No. 5); Defendants Ezra Holdings Limited, Ezra Energy Services PTE Ltd., and Emas Offshore Limited’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and, Alternatively, on the Basis of Forum Non Co
Donahue v. . Tokyo Electron America, Inc.public domain
ORDER SAM SPARKS, District Judge. BE IT REMEMBERED on this day the Court reviewed the file in the above-styled cause, and specifically Plaintiff Timothy Donahue’s Motion to Remand [# 5], Defendants Tokyo Electron America, Inc. and Tokyo Electron U.S. Holdings, Ine.’s Response [# 6], Plaintiff Donahue’s Reply [# 9], and Defendants’ Sur-Reply [# 12]; Counter Defendant Donahue’s Motion for Partial
Ge Betz Inc. v. Moffitt-Johnsonpublic domain
VANESSA D. GILMORE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court are Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant GE Betz, Inc., d/b/a GE Water & Process Technologies ("GE" or "Plaintiff")'s Motions for Summary Judgment on Defendants' counterclaims for business disparagement (Instrument No. 71 ) and tortious interference with customer contracts (Instrument No. 72 ) and employment contracts (