Cases

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 9813-CB ) MIDOCEAN BUSHNELL ) HOLDINGS, L.P., )

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 9813-CB ) MIDOCEAN BUSHNELL ) HOLDINGS, L.P., )

456 F.Supp.2d 1044 (2006) Clara Reece FULLER, Plaintiff, v. ALLIANT ENERGY CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., Defendant. No. C 05-92-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Cedar Rapids Division. October 16, 2006. *1045 *1046 *1047

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MOUNTAIN WEST SERIES OF LOCKTON ) COMPANIES, LLC (formerly known as DENVER ) SERIES OF LOCKTON COMPANIES, LLC) and ) LOCKTON PARTNERS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0226-JTL

WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Charlotte Dexter began working for Honeywell, Inc. (“Honeywell”) in 1964. Plaintiff-appellant Howard Evers began working for Honeywell in 1979. In 1990, Honeywell spun off its defense business to Alliant Techsystems, Inc. (“Alliant”). Following the spin-off, both Dexter and. Evers became Alliant employees. Dexter was laid off, effe

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-2275 SYSTEMS APPLICATION & TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:18-cv-02607-PX) Argued: Oct

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit __________ No. 99-2799 __________ Howard Evers, * * Appellant, * * v. *

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-1119C (Filed Under Seal: November 28, 2018) (Reissued for Publication: December 18, 2018) ************************************* TELESIS CORPORATION, * * Plaintiff, * * Postaward Bid Protest; RCFC 52.1; Cross- v.

38 F.Supp.2d 1306 (1995) Roger W. KREIMEYER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. No. Civ. 92-NC-088S. United States District Court, D. Utah, Northern Division. November 22, 1995. *1307 *1308 Fred R. Silvester, Silvester & Conroy, Salt Lake City, Utah, Claudia F. Be

*613 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction, RCFC 12(b)(1); Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109; Burden of Proof for Jurisdictional Facts Establishing Submission of Claim to Contracting Officer. ORDER James F. Merow, Senior Judge

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-568 (Filed: 20 January 2022) *************************************** SUNREZ CORPORATION, * * Plaintiff, * Breach of Contract; Contract Interpretation; * Implied Duty of Good Faith and Fair v.

45 F.Supp.2d 398 (1999) CORDANT TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC., and Hercules, Incorporated, Defendants. No. Civ.A. 95-706-JJF. United States District Court, D. Delaware. March 26, 1999. *399 *400 John G. Mulford, Theisen, Lank, Mulford & Goldberg, P.A., Wilmington

OPINION AND ORDER SWEENEY, Judge Plaintiff K-Con Building Systems, Inc. filed three suits in this court concerning its contracts with the United States Coast Guard (“Coast Guard”) for the design and construction of prefabricated metal buildings in Elizabeth City, North Carolina, St. Peters-burg, Florida, and Port Huron, Michigan. After the c

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) GOLDEN RULE FINANCIAL ) CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0378-PAF ) SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE ) SERVICES LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) ) )

OPINION AND ORDER SWEENEY, Judge Plaintiff K-Con Building Systems, Inc. filed three suits in this court concerning its contracts with the United States Coast Guard (“Coast Guard”) for the design and construction of prefabricated metal buildings in Elizabeth City, North Carolina, St. Peters-burg, Florida, and Port Huron, Michigan. The three suits share many similarities, but there are meaningful

48 P.3d 888 (2002) 2002 UT 32 WATER & ENERGY SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, Appellee, and Cross-Appellant, v. Steven L. KEIL and Brody Chemical Company, Inc., Defendants, Appellants, and Cross-Appellees. No. 20000468. Supreme Court of Utah. March 19, 2002. Rehearing Denied May 3, 2002.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BRYSON. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge PLAGER. BRYSON, Circuit Judge. The contract at issue in this government contract case contains an option clause. When the government sought to exercise that option, the contractor objected that the attempt was legally ineffective. After the contracting officer rej

LOREN, Circuit Judge. In 1994, Allina Health Systems, Inc. (“Allina”), conducted a three month investigation and concluded that serious billing improprieties had taken place at the Minneapolis Psychiatric Institute (“MPT”), a wholly owned Allina subsidiary, and that Richard Palmisano, Vice-President of Alli-na’s Behavioral Health Services division and a director of MPI, knew or

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 25-1275 ___________________________ Auto-Owners Insurance Company Plaintiff - Appellee v. Halo Foundation: Helping Art Liberate Orphans

GORDON McCLOUD, J. *752¶ 1 In Washington, hourly workers are entitled to their contractual hourly rate of pay (or the legal minimum wage) for every hour worked. Piece rate workers, on the other hand, are entitled to their contractual piece rate (or the legal minimum wage), but that rate is not necessarily guaranteed for every hour individually