Cases

394 S.E.2d 478 (1990) 99 N.C. App. 636 Harvey H. ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. Warnell SIMMONS, Defendant. No. 8921DC1155. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 7, 1990. *481 Kennedy, Kennedy, Kennedy and Kennedy by Harold L. Kennedy, III and Harvey L. Kennedy, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff-appellee. Leg

533 A.2d 541 (1987) Mary M. ALLEN, et al. v. Robert L. SIMMONS, et al. No. 85-542-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. November 23, 1987. *542 Raymond A. LaFazia, Netti C. Vogel, Gunning, LaFazia & Gnys, Inc., Providence, for plaintiffs. Paul V. Reynolds, Boyer, Reynolds & DeMarco, Providence, for defendants.

OPINION HARBISON, Justice. This case arises under the Uniform Commercial Code. In this Court the principal question is whether appellee is liable to appellants for conversion of a dragline used in stripmining operations. The trial court found that a conversion had occurred; the Court of Appeals reversed. We are of the opinion that the judgment of the trial court was correct, and it is reinstated.

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan May 2, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan May 2, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan April 28, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan April 28, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan November 6, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 01-2663 ___________ Willie Simmons, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Allen Luebbers, * *

DAVIS, Judge. The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred by allowing the State at the beginning of trial to amend the indictment charging the defendant with trafficking in heroin and instead charge him with trafficking in opiates. Stacy Allen Simmons ("Defendant") appeals from his convictions for possession of marijuana, possession of cocaine, trafficking in opiates by tran

HEANEY, Circuit Judge. Willie Simmons appeals from the district court’s denial of his petitions for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 1 We affirm in part and reverse in part. I. BACKGROUND Simmons was convicted in a single trial of two counts of capital m

*727ORDER JAMES E. GRITZNER, Senior Judge, U.S. DISTRICT COURT This matter comes before the Court on Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Desert Snow, LLC and Joe David (collectively, Desert Snow Defendants), ECF No. 12, and Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Iowa State Patrol Troopers Justin Simmons and Eric Vanderwiel and Special Agent Jessie Whitmer (collecti

MAXWELL, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Larry Simmons appeals his manslaughter conviction. He argues the State failed to prove beyond, a reasonable doubt that he did not act in necessary self-de*46fense when he shot and killed his wife’s boyfriend. We find the evidence was sufficient to support every element of manslaughter and does not weigh heavily against

*782Opinion HOCH, J. Defendant Todd Allen Simmons was convicted by jury of four counts of committing a lewd or lascivious act on a minor under the age of 14 years (counts 1, 4-6), one count of forcible sexual penetration (count 2), one count of forcible oral copulation (count 3), and one count of exhibiting harmful matter to a minor for purposes of seduc

PICKETT, Judge. 11Workers’ compensation insurer appeals the denial of its claim that it is entitled to a credit against the workers’ compensation benefits it owed to the claimant/owner for undistributed income of the claimant/owner’s sub-Chapter S corporation and rent the corporation paid the claimant/owner. Insurer also appeals the award of attorney fees and penalties for its termination of supplemental earnings benefits. W

Michael F. Urbanski, Chief United States District Judge This matter comes before the court on the Defendant-Appellants Jason Royce Allen, Kevin Chern, Law Solutions Chicago, LLC ("Law Solutions"), and UpRight Law, LLC's ("UpRight," and collectively "Petitioners") Motion to Stay (the "Motion"), ECF No. 97. Previously, the court granted a partial temporary stay until July 2, 2018 so the parties could brief and the court could consider

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Laquan Lorenzo Simmons appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights action on 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) review. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Simmons’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the di

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Cecil Simmons seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. Simmons, who filed a motion for reconsideration with the district court pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 5

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Cecil Simmons seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. Simmons, who filed a motion for reconsideration with the district court pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 5

PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. See Smith v. State, 951 So.2d 965 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). ALLEN, DAVIS, and THOMAS, JJ, concur.