⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Allen v. SP Plus Corporation”

Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024-11-15 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GB-SP HOLDINGS, LLC, on behalf of itself ) and derivatively on behalf of ) BRIDGESTREET WORLDWIDE, INC., ) and DONAL KINSELLA, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 9413-VCF ) WAYNE R. WALKER,
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2024-07-09 · Published · cited 0×
MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT CHRISTAL ALLEN, ) ) Respondent, ) WD86536 ) v. ) OPINION FILED: ) X & F ENTERPRISE CORP., ) July 9, 2024
Supreme Court of Missouri · 2002-07-23 · Published · cited 28× · 81 S.W.3d 528; 2002 Mo. LEXIS 80; 2002 WL 1611604
81 S.W.3d 528 (2002) JOEL BIANCO KAWASAKI PLUS, et al., Respondents, v. MERAMEC VALLEY BANK, Appellant. No. SC 84046. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. July 23, 2002. Rehearing Denied August 27, 2002. *530 Michael A. Campbell, Paula Colman, Polsinelli Shalton & Welte, St. Louis, for Appellant. Thomas
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-01-03 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TRAVELERS UNITED, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23-2776 (CKK) HYATT HOTELS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (January 3, 2025) Travelers United, Inc., a nonprofit public interest organization, filed
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010-03-31 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 21, 2010 Session JOHN ALLEN CONSTRUCTION, LLC v. JEROME HANCOCK, SANDRA HANCOCK, and CARROLL BANK AND TRUST Appeal from the Chancery Court for Benton County No. 00-195 Ron Harmon, Chancellor No. W2008-02785-COA-R3-CV - Filed March 31, 2010 This
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2015-06-12 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 14-10-00708-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 5:04:25 PM
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983-08-02 · Published · cited 40× · 717 F.2d 622; 219 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 499; 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25240
BOWNES, Circuit Judge. Milgo Electronic Corporation and International Communication (Milgo) appeal from an adverse declaratory judgment in a patent validity action brought by Codex Corporation and Yellow Freight Systems, Inc. (Codex). Codex cross-appeals because of the failure of the district court to grant all of the relief it sought and on the ground that the amount of attorne
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2015-11-19 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 12-15-00219-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 11/19/2015 8:06:13 PM
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2014-09-18 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued March 9, 2012. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-09-00643-CV ——————————— ROBERT B. ALLEN, Appellant V. DEVON ENERGY HOLDINGS, L.L.C. F/K/A C
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2012-03-09 · Published · cited 48× · 367 S.W.3d 355; 180 Oil & Gas Rep. 228; 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 2110; 2012 WL 880623
OPINION ON REHEARING 1 HARVEY BROWN, Justice. In this securities action, Robert Allen appeals from the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Devon Energy Holdings, L.L.C. formerly known as Chief Holdings, L.L.C. (Chief) 2 and its mana
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998-02-20 · Published · cited 127× · 133 F.3d 860; 1997 WL 801468
LOURIE, Circuit Judge. MAC Panel Co. (MAC) appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia holding that MAC infringes U.S. Patent 4,329,005, owned by Virginia Panel Corp. (VP). See Virginia Panel Corp. v. Mac Panel Co., 887 F.Supp. 880 (W.D.Va.1995) (Virginia Panel I). VP cross-appeals fro
District Court, E.D. Washington · 1962-06-26 · Published · cited 1× · 207 F. Supp. 545; 10 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5510; 1962 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4985
POWELL, Chief Judge. This is an action to recover a payment made after the filing of a federal tax lien under Sections 6321 and 6322 of Title 26 U.S.C.A. The facts as found are set forth hereafter and made a part of this opinion. It is my opinion that plaintiff is entitled to recover in this action against Land Title Company, defendant. The taxpayer, John A. Allen, has defaulted and judgment has been ente
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1969-04-30 · Published · cited 20× · 441 S.W.2d 247; 1969 Tex. App. LEXIS 2490
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 249 This appeal is from a judgment rendered after consolidating Causes 128,252, Capital Southwest Corporation v. Robert S. Calvert, Comptroller et al, Cause No. 127,416, Electro-Science Investors, Inc. et al v. the same defendants, and Cause No. 127,415, Texas Capital Corporation v. the same defendants. E
Foley v. Allenpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948-11-12 · Published · cited 3× · 170 F.2d 434; 37 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 535; 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 3826
WALLER, Circuit Judge. Mrs. Adele L. Foley, the generous mother of Frank, Charles, and Joseph Foley, in 1934 was the owner of 800 shares of common stock in the Coca-Cola Company of Atlanta, and undertook to give to Charles and Frank each 300 shares of that stock. Charles Foley for a long time'theretofore had managed his mother’s affairs to the same extent, and apparently with the same authority, as if her a
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990-09-19 · Published · cited 14× · 912 F.2d 1262; 118 P.U.R.4th 287; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 16430; 1990 WL 125506
912 F.2d 1262 1990-2 Trade Cases 69,186, 118 P.U.R.4th 287 CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,v.CITY GAS COMPANY OF FLORIDA, A Florida Corporation,Defendant-Appellant. No. 87-6108. United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Sept. 19, 1990. Jam
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987-12-30 · Published · cited 53× · 836 F.2d 521; 5 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1272; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 17111
MARKEY, Chief Judge. FMC Corporation and Vulcan Equipment Company, Ltd. (“FMC”) appeal from that part of a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, 650 F.Supp. 688, 2 U.S.P. Q.2d 1479 (N.D.Ill.1986) (Moran, J.), denying FMC’s claims for attorney fees. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (“Hennessy”) cross-appeals from that part of the judgm
Jordan Co. v. Allenpublic domain
District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1949-08-04 · Published · cited 2× · 85 F. Supp. 437; 38 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 442; 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2478
85 F.Supp. 437 (1949) JORDAN CO. v. ALLEN, Collector of Internal Revenue. Civ. A. No. 537. United States District Court M. D. Georgia, Macon Division. August 4, 1949. *438 J. Q. Davidson, Swift, Pease, Davidson & Chapman, Columbus, Georgia, Bertram S. Boley, Atlanta, Georgia, for plaintiff. John P. Cowart, U. S. Atty.,
District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1952-01-30 · Published · cited 0× · 103 F. Supp. 208; 41 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 940; 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4471
DAVIS, Chief Judge. The above captioned case having been presented to the Court without the intervention of a jury, upon the pleadings and agreed stipulation of facts, the Court does hereby make the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact. 1. The plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of Georgia on September 1, 1916 and its c
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974-05-28 · Published · cited 50× · 492 F.2d 1100
RIVES, Circuit Judge: William E. Owen, Jr., Joseph G. Scata, Julius Grossman, Frederick Morse Allen and seven others were indicted for conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 371; substantive violations of the federal mail fraud statutes, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1342, 1343; and aiding and abetting, 18 U.S.C. § 2. After a jury trial, Owen, Scata, Grossm
District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1946-02-12 · Published · cited 0× · 64 F. Supp. 804; 34 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1195; 1946 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2839
DAVIS, District Judge. The above-entitled case having been tried without a jury upon an agreed statement of facts, the Court, after hearing argument of counsel, makes the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment: Findings of Fact 1. Scripto Manufacturing Company, hereinafter referred to as Scripto, is a Georgia corporation which was incorporated on the 10th day of May,