Cases

478 So.2d 671 (1985) Douglas H. ALLEN et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ransom HORNE, Jr., Defendant-Appellee. No. 17338-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. October 30, 1985. *672 Charles B. Bice, Winnfield, for plaintiffs-appellants. J.P. Mauffray, Jr., Jena, for defendant-appellee. Before HALL, FRED

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-000448-15 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same; It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.

PER CURIAM. The petition for belated appeal is granted. Petitioner shall be allowed a belated appeal from the August 8, 2006, judgment and sentence in Leon County Circuit Court case number 2005-CF-001518B. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of this opinion shall be provided to the clerk of the circuit court for treatment as the notice of appeal. Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed counsel

660 F.Supp.2d 1152 (2009) Thomas and Christine HORNE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC., Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. and Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc., Defendants. Case No. CV 09-04126 DDP (MANx). United States District Court, C.D. California. September 30, 2009.

In the Giuted States Court of Federal Claims No, 19-1303C Filed: October 22, 2019 oR Ok GR OR HR eh Oe ok ok ok ok Ok Ok Ok ok & % WALTER ALLEN, : Plaintiff, * * Pro Se Plaintiff; Subject-Matter V. * Jurisdiction; Frivolous Complaint; UNITED STATES, * Sanctions. Defendant. *+ © & OO oR Ok Re ok ok ok ok ok ok oe ok ok Walter Allen, pro se, Brooklyn, NY. Sosun Bae, Attorney of Record, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for d

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

379 F.Supp.2d 1305 (2005) Leann HORNE, Plaintiff, v. RUSSELL COUNTY COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 3:03CV592-A. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Eastern Division. July 15, 2005. *1306 *1307 *1308 *1309

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE TOM HORNE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. KATIE HOBBS, et al., Defendants/Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 24-0615 FILED 07-17-2025 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CV2023-013656 The Honorable Sco

*140Pro se Plaintiff; In Forma Pauperis Application; Request for Appointment of Counsel; Lack of Subject Major Jurisdiction ORDER MARIAN BLANK HORN, Judge On December 29, 2015, pro se plaintiff Jack E. Allen filed in this court a rambling and repetitive forty page complaint, along with a ten page document

lln tl,e elnitei Stdted €ourt 0f .felsral @l80rtg No. 15-1585C FII€di2/25h6 JACK E, ALLEN, Plainrfi, elgS9 Plaintiff; ]!Egqa P.uooris Application; R€quest for Appointmsnt ol Couns.li Lack of UNITED STATES, Subiecl Mattor Jurisdict

Pro Se Plaintiffs; Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; Breach of Contract; Contract Interpretation. OPINION HORN, J. FINDINGS OF FACT Plaintiffs are twelve current or former employees of the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (Forest Service), employed in the Los Padr

BIRCH, Circuit Judge: An Alabama jury found petitioner James Charles Lawhorn (“Lawhorn”) guilty of *1276capital murder and recommended that he be sentenced to death. The state circuit court judge adopted that recommendation and sentenced Lawhorn to death. After exhausting his state court remedies, Law-horn filed a federal habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C

OPINION PRICE, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. It is a defense to the offense of simple assault that the victim effectively consented to the offender's assaultive conduct or that the offender reasonably believed that the victim consented, at least so long as the conduct did not threaten or inflict serious bodily injury.1 When evidence at trial raises the defense of consent, "

OPINION VÁSQUEZ, Presiding Judge. ¶ 1 After a jury trial, Vincent Allen was convicted of forgery and criminal trespass. The trial court sentenced him to ten years’ imprisonment for forgery and time served for criminal trespass. On appeal, Allen argues the state presented insufficient evidence to support a conviction for forgery. He also argues the court

634 F.3d 588 (2011) Antoine JONES, Appellant v. Norma HORNE, Detective-MPD, et al., Appellees. No. 09-5128. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued October 14, 2010. Decided February 11, 2011. *591 Michael N. Khalil, appointed by the court, argued the cause as amicus curiae in support

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 05/09/2025 09:09 AM CDT - 904 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 318 Nebraska Reports CZECH V. ALLEN Cite as 318 Neb. 904 Victoria A. Czech, Personal Re

Burnett v Allen (2023 NY Slip Op 04003) Burnett v Allen 2023 NY Slip Op 04003 Decided on July 28, 2023 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARVIN D. HORNE and LAURA R.  HORNE, d.b.a. RAISIN VALLEY FARMS, a partnership, and d.b.a. RAISIN VALLEY FARMS MARKETING ASSOCIATION, a.k.a. RAISIN VALLEY MARKETING, an unincorporated No. 10-15270 association; MARVIN D. HORNE; LAURA R. HORNE; DON DURBAHN, D.C. No. and the ESTATE OF RENA DURBAHN,  1:08-cv-01549-LJO-

No. 123,647 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ANTHONY DARRYL ALLEN, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The Sixth Amendment guarantees criminal defendants the right t