Cases

683 F.Supp.2d 1284 (2010) Louise HARRIS, Petitioner, v. Richard ALLEN, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, Respondent. Civil Action No. 2:07cv239-MHT. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. February 8, 2010. *1285 Jessica Renee Holloway, New York, NY, Pro Hac Vice. Stuart Walter Gold, C

Judge STUCKY delivered the opinion of the Court. We granted review to consider whether the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals erred by failing to award Appellant sufficient additional pretrial confinement credit for unduly rigorous brig conditions and improper denial of necessary medical care, and whether the relief the

Carlton W. Reeves, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are three motions for summary judgment filed by Valerie Harris, Noxubee County, and Betty Robinson. Docket Nos. 40, 43, 45. Additionally, Robinson seeks leave to file a motion for judgment on the pleadings and Harris seeks leave to supplement her response in opposition. Docket Nos. 58, 61. The parties all argue that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact i

Brown, Judge. This is the second appearance of this case before this Court. In Harris v. State , 342 Ga. App. 829 , 805 S.E.2d 281

Justice KITTREDGE. This is a legal malpractice action in which the trial court granted summary judgment to the law firm of Moore & Van Allen, PLLC and attorney W. Howell Morrison (Respondents). We certified the appeal of Harris Teeter, Inc. pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR. We affirm. I. STANDARD OF REVIEW Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genu

331 B.R. 634 (2005) Connie S. ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. J.K. HARRIS & CO., LLC, Defendant, v. Thomas J. Allen, Connie S. Allen, Debtors-in-Possession. No. 05-MC-74. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. October 12, 2005. *635 *636 *637 Ann

Opinion ROBIE, J. A jury found defendant James David Allen guilty of escape for leaving his mother’s house, which was his assigned place of confinement under an alternative custody agreement. In challenging his escape conviction, defendant contends there was no substantial evidence that his failure to return

Bethel, Judge. *564 Jason Ian Harris was charged with one count of child molestation. A jury trial ensued during which the trial court granted Harris' motion for mistrial made after the prosecution played an unredacted video of the defendant's interview with a state investigator. Harris subs

PER CURIAM: Kelvin D. Harris, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP), appeals a district court order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims for false arrest and malicious prosecution against the following defendants connected with his 1989 probation revocation hearing: Florida Circuit Judge Mario Goderich;1 state prosecutors Eugene Cipriano and Myra Trinchet; Warr

10 A.3d 1183 (2010) 196 Md. App. 617 Deane J. ALLEN, et al. v. Sharon J. RITTER, Esquire, Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Roy Harry Allen. No. 2350, September Term, 2009. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. December 10, 2010. Reconsideration Denied February 4, 2011. *1184

ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Chief Judge 11 Thomas Fletcher Allen was convicted in the White County Circuit Court on thirty counts of possessing child pornography and three counts of computer exploitation of a child. His sole argument on appeal is that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to support his conviction. We affirm.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

421 B.R. 597 (2010) In re Wesley Allen HARRIS, Debtor. Habersham Bank, Movant v. Wesley Allen Harris, Respondent. No. 09-11449. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia, Augusta Division. January 15, 2010. *598 Lee Ringler, Lee Ringler Law Offices, Augusta, GA, for Debtor. ORDER SUSAN D. BAR

MAXWELL, J„ for the Court: ¶ 1. Tommie Harris challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his child-exploitation conviction. A jury found him guilty of violating Mississippi Code Annotated section 97-5-33(6) (Supp.2012), which prohibits anyone from knowingly enticing, inducing, persuading, seducing, or soliciting a child to meet with him or any other person “for the purpose of engaging in sexuall

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER GARY L. SHARPE, District Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiffs Robert Allen, Matthew Fuller, Carol Lennon, Claudia Montecalvo, and Emilija Thevanesan commenced this action against defendants Elizabeth R. Berlin, Acting Commissioner of the New York State Education Department,1 the New York State Education .Department

48 So.3d 922 (2010) Brandon Allen HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 5D09-2042. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. November 19, 2010. *923 James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rose M. Levering, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tal

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, November 30, 2023 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24I0076. KRISTOPHER ALLEN et al v. STEVE HARRIS. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of th

HUMPHREYS, Judge. Allen Lamont Harris appeals his convictions in a jury trial for murder in the second degree and grand larceny. He contends the trial court erred (1) in instructing the jury following a question by a juror regarding the failure of the parties to call a particular individual as a witness, and (2) failing to impanel a

THIRD DIVISION DOYLE, P. J., HODGES and WATKINS, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules October 30

OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: We must decide whether we have jurisdiction to review the validity of a judgment entered by a magistrate judge who failed to obtain the consent of both parties, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). We conclude that we do. Because the magistrate judge entered judgment on behalf of the district court without the parties’ conse