Cases

KATZMANN, Chief Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant Allco Finance Limited (“Allco”) appeals from a final judgment entered on December 11, 2014 by the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Arterton, J.), which dismissed Allco’s complaint. Allco brought this action against Defendant-Appellee Robert Klee (“Commissioner”), in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environme

CALABRESI, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant Allco Finance Limited (“Allco” or “Plaintiff’) appeals from a final judgment entered by the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Haight, /.), which dismissed two of Allco’s related, but not formally consolidated, Complaints (“the Complaints”). The Complaints focus

15‐20 ALLCO Finance v. Klee UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT _______________ August Term, 2015 (Submitted: September 2, 2015 Decided: November 6, 2015 Amende

15-20 ALLCO v. Klee UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT _______________ August Term, 2015 (Submitted: September 2, 2015 Decided: November 6, 2015)

DOOLEY, J. ¶ 1. Allco Renewable Energy Ltd. (Allco) appeals from the denial of its motion to intervene, and its renewed motion to intervene, in this certificate-of-public-good (CPG) proceeding for a solar electric generation facility. The applicant, GMPSolar-Richmond, LLC (GMPSR), is an affiliate of Green Mountain Power Corp. (GMP), an electricity utility. The applicant is owned by GMP

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

STEVENS, J. This appeal arises from the most recent in a series of civil actions that the plaintiff, Sylvester Traylor, has brought in state and federal court relating to the suicide of his wife, Roberta Mae Traylor (Roberta). The plaintiff, who is self-represented, brought the present case against the defendants, who are (1) the state of Connecticut, numerous current and former Super

CHIEF JUSTICE KARMEIER delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. ¶ 1 This matter is before the court on administrative review of an order by the Illinois Commerce Commission (Commission) granting a certificate of public convenience and necessity to Rock Island Clean Line, LLC (Rock Island), for construction of a high voltage electric transmission line between O'Brien Count

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and

Dennis Jacobs, Circuit Judge: *45Plaintiffs, a group of electrical generators and trade groups of electrical generators, appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Caproni, J. ) granting Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss. In August 2016, the New York Public Service Commis

17‐2654‐cv Coalition for Competitive Electricity, et al. v. Zibelman, et al. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2017 No. 17‐2654‐cv COALITION FOR COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY, DYNERGY INC., EASTERN GENERATION, LLC, ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY AS

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1059 Doc: 99 Filed: 03/10/2021 Pg: 1 of 67 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1059 PHILLIP ALIG; SARA J. ALIG; ROXANNE SHEA; DANIEL V. SHEA, Individually and on behalf of a class of persons, Plaintiffs - Appellees,

18-2188 City of New York v. Chevron Corp. 1 United States Court of Appeals 2 For the Second Circuit 3 4 5 August Term 2019 6 7 Argued: November 22, 2019 8 Decided: April 1, 2021 9 10 No. 18-2188 11 12 13 CITY OF

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1059 PHILLIP ALIG; SARA J. ALIG; ROXANNE SHEA; DANIEL V. SHEA, Individually and on behalf of a class of persons, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. QUICKEN LOANS INC.; AMROCK INC., f/k/a Title Source, Inc., d/b/a Title Source Inc. of West Virginia, Incorporated,

15-20 Allco Finance v. Klee UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT _______________ August Term, 2015 (Submitted: September 2, 2015 Decided: November 6, 2015) Docket No. 15‐20

KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: *297In a 398-paragraph complaint, Plaintiffs detail a wide-ranging conspiracy to prevent the antiquated stock loan market from evolving into a transparent, direct, all-to-all electronic exchange. This market is critical to the short selling of stocks, a not-uncommon investment tool. The thrust of Plaintiff

NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case requires us to consider whether a public official may, consistent with the First Amendment, "block" a person from his Twitter account in response to the political views that person has expressed, and whether the analysis differs because that public official is the President of the United States. The answer to both questions is no. Our analysis proceeds as