Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “All in Production, LLP v. Federated Sports & Gaming, Inc”
ProBatter Sports, LLC v. Sports Tutor, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Hon." Vanessa L. Bryant, United States District" Judge Plaintiff ProBatter Sports, LLC (“Pro-Batter”), a Connecticut business designing, manufacturing, selling, installing, and servicing pitching .machines, produces a three-wheeled machine called ProBatter Simulator. ProBatter Simulator, which has been sold to professional baseball teams, professional baseball players, and colleges, si
Steve Asmussen v. Iowa Racing and Gaming Commissionpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 22-0990 Filed December 20, 2023 STEVE ASMUSSEN, Petitioner-Appellant, vs. IOWA RACING AND GAMING COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Celene Gogerty, Judge. Petitioner appeals the decision of the district court that affirmed the impo
Baseline Sports, Inc. v. Third Base Sportspublic domain
341 F.Supp.2d 605 (2004) BASELINE SPORTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. THIRD BASE SPORTS d/b/a Peach State Wholesale, Premier Hobby Distribution, LLC, James Grant, and Scott Davis, Defendants. No. 2:04CV461. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia. Norfolk Division. October 28, 2004. *606 Ray Webb King, Esquire, Charles Michael Sims,
Relevent Sports v. U.S. Soccer Federationpublic domain
21-2088-cv Relevent Sports v. U.S. Soccer Federation 1 2 3 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 4 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 5 6 August Term, 2021 7 8 (Argued: April 7, 2022 Decided: March 7, 2023) 9 10 Docket No. 21-2088-cv 11 _____________________________________ 12 13 RELEVENT SPORTS, LLC, 14 15
Mikohn Gaming Corporation v. Acres Gaming, Inc.public domain
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. Acres Gaming, Inc. appeals the grant of a preliminary injunction by the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, 1 prohibiting Acres from stating to customers and prospective customers of Mikohn Gaming Corporation and through the public press that Mikohn’s MoneyTime System
Baden Sports, Inc. v. Moltenpublic domain
541 F.Supp.2d 1151 (2008) BADEN SPORTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Kabushiki Kaisha MOLTEN (DBA Molten Corporation) and Molten U.S.A., Inc., Defendants. No. C06-210MJP. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. January 28, 2008. *1153 Bruce A. Kaser, Vantage Law, Issaquah, WA, James L. Phillips, Aubrey Anne Seffernick,
422 F.Supp.2d 1271 (2006) MONTANA PROFESSIONAL SPORTS, LLC, a Montana corporation, Plaintiff, v. LEISURE SPORTS MANAGEMENT, INC., a Florida corporation and National Indoor Football League, LLC, an Ohio corporation, Defendants. No. CIVA605CV1827ORL18DA. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. February 7, 2006. *1272
Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion and Supporting Brief to Determine That This Matter Proceed as a Class Action, filed January 6, 2014 (Doe. 194)(“Motion”). The Court held a two-part class certification hearing with its first portion on March 10,11, and 12, 2014, and its second portion on April 3 and 4, 2014.
Wellogix, Inc. v. Accenture, LLPpublic domain
788 F.Supp.2d 523 (2011) WELLOGIX, INC., Plaintiff, v. ACCENTURE, LLP, Defendant. Case No. 3:08-cv-119. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. April 22, 2011. *528 Richard N. Laminack, Laminack Pirtle et al., Buffy Kay Martines, Laminack Pirtle and Martines, Frank Zugin Lin, Hagan Noll Boyle LLC, Guy Kelly Co
Cias, Inc. v. Alliance Gaming Corp.public domain
504 F.3d 1356 (2007) CIAS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLIANCE GAMING CORPORATION and Bally Gaming, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 2006-1342. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. September 27, 2007. Rehearing Denied October 24, 2007. *1357 Robert C. Morgan, Ropes & Gray LLP, of New York, NY, a
Mrc Innovations, Inc. v. Hunter Mfg., LLPpublic domain
PROST, Circuit Judge. MRC Innovations, Inc. appeals from a final judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio granting summary judgment of invalidity with respect to U.S. Design Patent Nos. D634,488 S (“'488 patent”) and D634,487 S (“'487 patent”). For the reasons stated below, we affirm. Background M
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GEORGE B. DANIELS, District Judge: Plaintiff Mitre Sports International Limited (“Mitre”) commenced this action against Defendant Home Box Office, Inc. (“HBO”), alleging that Defendant’s distribution of a portion of “Real Sports With Bryan Gumbel Episode # 138” entitled “Children of the Industry” (“COI”) on September 16, 2008 defamed Plaintiff by falsely portraying
Masck v. Sports Illustratedpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [# 107] GERSHWIN A. DRAIN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On January 18, 2013, Plaintiff, Brian Masck (“Masck”), filed the instant action alleging copyright infringement. Presently before the Court is Defendants,’ Getty Images, Inc. (“Getty”), Sports Illustrated (“SI”), Nissan North America (“Nis
MEMORANDUM OPINION Marvin Isgur, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Comcast Corporation, Comcast Sports Management Services, LLC, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Houston Sport-sNet Finance, LLC, Houston SportsNet Holdings, LLC, National Digital Television Center, LLC, Comcast SportsNet California, LLC, NBCUniversal Media, LLC, Jon Litner, John Ruth, Robert Pick, and Madison Bond have filed a motion
Pippins v. KPMG LLPpublic domain
GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge: The Fair Labor Standards Act (“the FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219, protects “the minimum standard of living necessary for health, efficiency, and general well-being of workers.” Id. § 202(a). To this end, the FLSA mandates, inter alia, that employers pay additional compensation at a higher rate to employees who work more than forty hours per week. Id. § 207(a)(1). However, the
Hays v. Equitex, Inc. (In Re RDM Sports Group, Inc.)public domain
260 B.R. 905 (2001) In the Matter of RDM SPORTS GROUP, INC.; RDM Holdings, Inc.; Sports Group, Inc.; Diversified Products Corporation; Willow Hosiery Company, Inc.; Hutch Sports USA, Inc.; Diversified Trucking Corp.; International Sports and Fitness, Inc.; and T.Q., Inc., Debtors. William G. Hays, Jr., as Liquidating Agent, f/k/a Chapter 11 Trustee, for RDM Sports Group, Inc. and Related Debtors, Plaintiff, v. Equitex, Inc.; Smith, Gambrell,
Memorandum of Opinion and Order PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN, District Judge. This is a patent infringement action pertaining to two design patents relating to *802sports jerseys for pets. Defendants Hunter MFG, LLP (Hunter) and CDI International, Inc. (CDI) have filed a joint motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 42.) Also pending before the Court
Gentile v. Franklin Sports, Inc.public domain
211 F.Supp.2d 334 (2002) Robert GENTILE, Plaintiff, v. FRANKLIN SPORTS, INC., Defendant. No. CIV. 01-10332-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 1, 2002. *335 *336 Donald T. MacPhail, III, Law Office of Donald T. MacPhail, Berkley, MA, Thomas P. O'Connell, O'Connell law Offi
Abraham v. WPX Production Productions, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Class Certification, filed January 13, 2014 (Doe. 116). The Court held a multi-part class certification heating, which took place on: (i) May 8 and 9, 2014; (ii) March 13 and 14, 2014; (iii) June 30, 2014; and (iv) July 14, 2014
Anthem Sports, LLC v. Under the Weather, LLCpublic domain
Michael P. Shea, District Judge. Plaintiffs Anthem Sports, LLC ("Anthem"), and Griffin Global Products, LLC, bring this suit against Under the Weather, LLC ("UTW"), and Eric Pescovitz, its principal, for various intellectual property and other claims arising from the marketing and sale of "sportspods," i.e., small tents for viewing outdoor sporting events during inclement weather. The plaintiffs set out eight counts in their amended