Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GEORGE C. HANKS, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff, Emanuel Watson (‘Watson”), has filed this action against Defendants GOM Shelf, LLC (“GOM”)1, Sparrows Offshore, LLC (“Sparrows”), and Wood *407Group PSN, Inc. (“Wood Group”), (collectively as “Defendants”) asserting claims for personal in

NUMBER 13-22-00377-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE KIRBY OFFSHORE MARINE OPERATING, LLC On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Silva, and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Justice Be

FINDING OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW JAY C. ZAINEY, District Judge. This litigation arises out of a maritime collision between the F/V STAR OCEAN *556and the M/V ST. JOSEPH THE WORKER that took place on March 1, 2012. Plaintiffs Trinh Van Tran and Lanh Tran, captain and deckhand, respectively, of the F/V STAR OCEAN, seek damages for pe

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MARUBENI SPAR ONE, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2018-0908-SG ) WILLIAMS FIELD SERVICES – GULF ) COAST COMPANY, L.P., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: October 1

ORDER NELVA GONZALES RAMOS, District Judge. Plaintiff, Oliver Figueroa (Figueroa) sustained injuries and burns when performing hot work on the vessel, MOC 10, while it was in dry dock on March 18, 2013. He has sued Defendant Marine Inspection Services, LLC (Marine Inspection) based on its responsibility for permitting and monitoring hot work on the vessel. He has also sued Defendant Third Coast

Owens, J. ¶1 Two companies applied for permits to expand their oil terminals on the shores of Grays Harbor. The expansion would facilitate the storage of additional fuel products, which would arrive by train or truck and depart by ocean-bound ship. The issue here is whether the Ocean Resources Management Act (ORMA), chapter 43.143 RCW, *464applies to these expansion proje

OPINION AND ORDER KEVIN NATHANIEL POX, United States Magistrate Judge. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On October 27, 2004, the plaintiffs commenced a state-court action against the Hanover Insurance Company, Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company, Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, Inc. (collectively the “insurance companies”) and Horn-beck Offshore Transportation, LLC (“Hornbeek”), seeking damages bas

Johanson, C.J. — ¶1 The Quinault Indian Nation, Friends of Grays Harbor, Grays Harbor Audubon Society, Sierra Club, and Citizens for a Clean Harbor (collectively Quinault) appealed the Shoreline Hearings Board’s (Board) grant of summary judgment on certain issues to Westway Terminal Company LLC, Imperium Terminal Services LLC, the Department of Ecology (DOE), and the city of Hoquiam

Case: 24-30674 Document: 73-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/04/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED September 4, 2025 No. 24-30674

OPINION AND JUDGMENT ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: 1. Overview On the evening of Monday, October 29, 2012, Hurricane1 Sandy made landfall in southern New Jersey, causing billions of dollars in damage along the East Coast of the United States. As a result of flooding at the New York Container Terminal (“NYCT” or the “Terminal”) located

Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief United States District Judge This is a contractual-indemnity dispute arising out of underlying wrongful-death and personal-injury lawsuits filed after a crane accident in September 2017. The underlying plaintiffs sued the Teichman Group, LLC, T & T Offshore, Inc.,1 and OSG Lightering, LLC,2 seeking damages for the deaths and injuries. OSG Lighterin

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE OHIO HOUSE, LLC, No.22-56181 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:19-cv-01710- v. JVS-GJS CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation, ORDER AND AMENDED Defendant-Appellee, OPINION and BR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TAYLOR ENERGY COMPANY LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-1086 (JDB) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, acting by and through the UNITED STATES COAST GUARD NATIONAL POLLUTION FUNDS CENTER, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Taylor Energy Company LLC (“Taylor Energy”) broug

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE OHIO HOUSE, LLC, No. 22-56181 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:19-cv-0171f0- v. JVS-GJS CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation, OPINION Defendant-Appellee, and BRANDON STUMP, an individual; RYAN STUMP, an individual; KEITH

Eldon E. Fallon, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY This case arises out of a December 29, 2014 allision between barges in the tow of M/V MYRA ECKSTEIN, a tugboat owned and operated by Marquette Transportation Company, LLC ("Marquette"), and barges MISS DARLENE and MISS ASHLEY, owned by Monticello Equipment Corporation ("Monticello") and operated by Kostmayer Constructi

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Sue E. Myerscough, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE . This matter came before the Court on January 19, 2016, for a bench trial. The first phase of the bench trial was completed on February 17, 2016. The trial resumed, on October 26, 2016. The Court heard testimony on October 25-27, 2016 and November 2, 2016. The Plaintiff United States appeared by Assistant United States A

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Within United States Territorial Waters and Ports) SHARON L. GLEASON, District Judge. Shell Oil Company1 filed a combined Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction on February 27, 2012.2 After a hearing on February 29, 2012 at which both Shell and Greenpeace, Inc., p

REVISED SEPTEMBER 3, 2009 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 12, 2009 No. 08-60696 Charles R. Fulbruge III

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY. JUDGMENT Alan C. Kay, Sr. United States District Judge For the following reasons, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’- Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doe. No. 50.) Because the Court concludes that the United States Coast Guard Commercial Diving Operations regulations do not apply to Defendants’ Kampachi Vessels, the Court grants judgment in Defendants’ favor

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS