Cases

76 Cal.Rptr.3d 632 (2008) 162 Cal.App.4th 1241 Lisa STEELE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. YOUTHFUL OFFENDER PAROLE BOARD, Defendant and Appellant. No. C053553. Court of Appeal of California, Third District. May 13, 2008. *635 Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, David S. Chaney, Chief Assistant Attorney

FILED DEC 11 2023 ORDERED PUBLISHED SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELL

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0193p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ALICIA M. PEDREIRA; JOHANNA W.H. VAN WIJK-BOS;

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN E. STEELE, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Innovative Pension Strategies, Ine.’s (IPS) Partial Motion for Summary Judgment on Damages (Doc. #338) filed on July 20, 2012. Defendants Independent Advisors of Florida, Inc., LWY Associates, Inc., Jeffrey Lambs, Eugene Gordon, Joseph Penchansky, and the Graduate Group join in the motion. (Docs

Miller, Judge. In these consolidated cases, Robert Porche, the tax commissioner for the City of Woodstock (the “City”), appeals from the superior *525court’s order denying the City’s petitions for ad valorem tax lien foreclosure of adjoining townhomes owned by Juan Pablo Noriega, Emilio Rafael Noriega and Ana Lilian Noriega. Porche contends that the superior court err

867 A.2d 182 (2005) Danielle M. LANG and John Doe, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. Raymond MORANT, Alicia Morant, his wife, Plaintiffs Below, Appellee. No. 545,2003. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: December 15, 2004. Decided: January 13, 2005. Louis B. Ferrara (argued) of Ferrara, Haley, Bevis & Solomon, Wilmington, Delaware for appellant.<

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-

360 B.R. 632 (2006) In re WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP., Debtor. Triad Metals, Inc. Plaintiff, v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. Defendant. No. 06-3100. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio. August 31, 2006. *633 Alicia J. Blumenfeld, Detroit, MI, Stuart A. Laven, Cleveland, OH, Monica M. Moore, Badman, Longley &

385 B.R. 87 (2008) In re M. FABRIKANT & SONS, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 06-12737(SMB). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. April 9, 2008. *89 Troutman Sanders LLP, Mitchel H. Perkiel, Esq., Lee W. Stremba, Esq., Paul H. Deutch, Esq., of Counsel, New York, NY, for the Debtors. Kramer, Levin, Naftalis & Frankel L

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-15-00773-CV AECOM USA, INC. and TCB, Inc., Appellants v. Jose Maria MATA, Individually, as Next Friend of Monica Gabriel Mata, and on behalf of the Estate of Martha Alic

ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction. (Doc. 7). The parties have filed briefs and evidentiary materials in support of their respective positions, (Docs. 7-8,'20-21, 23), and the motion is ripe for resolution. After careful consideration, the Court concludes the motion is due to be granted.

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN E. STEELE, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on petitioner Mario Alberto Lopez Morales’s Verified Petition for Return of Child to the Republic of Mexico (Doc. # 1) filed on February 14, 2014. Respondent Nency Castellanos Martinez filed a Response (Doc. # 20) on May 7, 2014. After ordering expedited pretrial proceedings, the Court conducted a bench trial o

674 F.Supp.2d 822 (2009) Richard C. MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. J.A.M. DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:08-CV-298. United States District Court, E.D. Texas. July 13, 2009. *827 Melissa Ann Moore, Moore & Associates, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff. Dawn Rachelle Tezino, Elizabeth Brandes Pratt, and Morris C. Ca

OPINION BUSTAMANTE, Judge. {1} After an arbitrator awarded Appellant Dr. Biren Shah $1,465,876, Defendants moved for—and were granted—a modification of the award. The district court reduced the award to $150,000. Discerning no basis for the reduction, we reverse the district court’s modification and remand for confirma

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CALLIE V.S. GRANADE, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the motion for summary judgment (Doc. 40) and supplemental motion for summary judgment (Doc. 57) filed by the defendants, the Selma City Board of Education (the “Board”) and Joe J. Peterson (“Peterson”) (collectively, the “defendants”). The parties have filed briefs and ev

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SELENA E. MOLINA LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER SENIOR MAGISTRATE IN CHANCERY 500 NORTH KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DE 19801-3734

JUSTICE WHITING delivered the opinion of the Court. In applying a statute of limitations to a claim for breach of implied warranties, we must decide when the plaintiff’s cause of action accrued under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Since the trial court decided the issue on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the pleadings and exhibits attached thereto, we state the facts in the light most favorab

OPINION OF THE COURT ROBERT PAUL KAYE, Circuit Judge. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The Plaintiffs in the instant case, SOUTHERN AIR TRANSPORT, *77INC. brought suit against the Defendants POST-NEWSWEEK STATIONS OF FLORIDA, INC., d/b/a WLPG TELEVISION, et al., alleging that the Defendants, by broadcast of a th

SECTION A REASONS FOR DECISION Hon. Elizabeth W. Magner, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge This matter is before the Court pursuant to a Motion for Summary Judgment (P-49) filed on behalf of defendant, Capital One, N.A. (“Capital One”). Plaintiff, Kane-tha Arun Chau (“Chau”) has filed an Opposition to Capital One’s Motion for Summary Judgment (P-55) an

Eric C. Tostrud, United States District Court Judge This case is about insurance coverage for injuries from a dog bite. The answer to the coverage question depends on whether a term appearing in the relevant policy in bold text-"insured "-means the same thing or something different when it appears in the policy in plain text-"insured." Plaintiff Auto-Owners Insurance Company says the word unambiguously has the same