Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ali Malone”
State v. Alipublic domain
[Cite as State v. Ali, 2024-Ohio-5325.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 113750 v. : MAHSOULL ALI, :
Commonwealth v. Malone, J.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 133 EM 2018 : Respondent : : : v. : : :
Malone v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.public domain
8 S.W.3d 710 (1999) Gene MALONE, Derrick L. Malone Enterprises, and Ali Assi, Appellants, v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO. Appellee. No. 2-98-218-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. December 9, 1999. Rehearing Overruled January 27, 2000. *712 William C. Meier, Bedford, for appellant. Dennis M. C
Malone, Laray Jr.public domain
ULl5F._ Lin.. l!-oR:()ff99--C.R-It ) · 17<;;p1:J-a J ) , lA.fA'f fY\ AloUg_ TJL. ~· La d2T oF tbMrU AL V5 ~ AppeALs of TEXAS -rl;t;.~S TArs_ a F leX.A.S SS MOllO~ [)~INJRIEII:ll DATE: _tle- \!) S BY: X .c..· mrTif
Omar Ali Rahman v. John Joseph Lyonspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-CA-00788-COA OMAR ALI RAHMAN APPELLANT v. JOHN JOSEPH LYONS APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/29/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CYNTHIA L. BREWER COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: MADISON COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATT
United States v. Alipublic domain
822 F.Supp.2d 916 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Amina Farah ALI, Defendant. Criminal No. 10-187. United States District Court, D. Minnesota. October 3, 2011. Jeffrey S. Paulsen, Assistant United States Attorney, and Steven Ward, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, for Plaintiff. Daniel M. Scott, Kelley, Wolter & Scott, P.A., for D
United States v. Sergeant First Class MICHAEL MALONEpublic domain
UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Before the Court Sitting En Banc UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Sergeant First Class MICHAEL S. MALONE, JR. United States Army, Appellant ARMY 20230151 Headquarters, 1st Armored Division and Fort Bliss Jessica R. Conn, Military Judge Colonel Andrew D. Flor, Staff Judge Advocate For Appellant: Major Robert D. Luyties, JA (argued); Lieutenant Colonel Autumn R. Porter, JA; Captain Matthew S. Fields, JA; Major Cody Cheek, JA (on brief); Colonel Philip M.
Ali L. Ghanbari v. Statepublic domain
AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed April 17, 2019. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00257-CR ALI L. GHANBARI, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District
Base One Technologies, Inc. v. Alipublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge One reason that companies insert non-compete provisions in their employment contracts is to prevent their workers from stealing their clients. That, claims Plaintiff Base One Technologies, is precisely what happened here. Base One is an information-te
State of Tennessee v. Alvin Malonepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON July 1, 2008 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ALVIN MALONE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 06-00684 W. Fred Axley, Judge No. W2007-01119-CCA-R3-CD - Filed October 2, 2008 The defendant, Alvin Malone, was convicted by a Shelby County jury of two cou
Ross v. Rosspublic domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Ali v. Statepublic domain
742 S.W.2d 749 (1987) Hussien ALI, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 05-86-01311-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. November 25, 1987. *751 George Scharmen, San Antonio, for appellant. Gary A. Moore, Dallas, for appellee. Before STEPHENS, STEWART and THOMAS, JJ.
Malone v. Signal Processing Technologies, Inc.public domain
826 F.Supp. 370 (1993) Ramona MALONE, Plaintiff, v. SIGNAL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 92-B-728. United States District Court, D. Colorado. June 30, 1993. *371 *372 Dwight L. Pringle, Patrick B. Mooney, Semple & Jackson, P.C., Denver, CO, for plaintiff.</
Morinville v. US Inventor, Inc.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL VINCENT MORINVILLE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24-3422 (AHA) v. US INVENTOR, INC, et al. Defendants. Memorandum Opinion Plaintiff Paul Morinville sued Defendants US Inventor (“USI”), Josh Malone, and Randy Landreneau i
Jerald Samuel Alderman v. State of Floridapublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JERALD ALDERMAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D2022-3088 [May 22, 2024] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Caroline
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR ALI AZIZ, BY AND THROUGH HIS ) No. ED101003 NATURAL MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND, ) ANNETTE BROWN, ) ) Respondents, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of t
Badlam v. Reynolds Metals Co.public domain
46 F.Supp.2d 187 (1999) Patricia BADLAM, Plaintiff, v. REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY and United Steelworkers of America, The Aluminum, Brick and Glass Division, Local No. 450-A, Defendants. Susan McGregor, Plaintiff, v. Reynolds Metals Company and United Steelworkers of America, The Aluminum, Brick and Glass Division, Local No. 450-A, Defendants. Edna Norton, Plaintiff, v. Reynolds Metals Company and United Steelworkers of Ameri
Affirmed and En Banc Majority Opinion and En Banc Dissenting Opinions filed May 18, 2023. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-00967-CV WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SHIRAZ A. ALI, Appellants V. JENNIFER BLAKE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR NATHAN BLAKE, AND AS HEIR OF THE ESTATE OF ZACHERY BLAKE, DECEASED; AND ELDRIDGE MOAK, IN HIS CAPACIT
In re Matter of Brewerpublic domain
Per Curiam: Bryan Brewer challenges the district court's summary dismissal of his habeas corpus petition related to extradition proceedings. Although Brewer's procedural errors bar our review of most of his claims, we agree that Brewer may be entitled to a hearing on his habeas corpus petition. As a result, we remand for further proceedings. Factual and Procedural Background Bryan Brewer w
Alexander Garcia v. Yellow Cab Companypublic domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 18, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D24-0391 Lower Tribunal No. 13-33229 ________________ Alexander Garcia, Petitioner,