⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Alfred Noe”

Noe v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983-06-08 · Published · cited 17× · 654 S.W.2d 701; 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1071
654 S.W.2d 701 (1983) Clifford D. NOE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 214-83. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. June 8, 1983. Anthony J. Blazi, San Antonio, for appellant. Bill M. White, Dist. Atty., H. Wayne Campbell, Edward J. Coffey and James L. Bruner, Asst. Dist. Attys., San Antonio, Robert Huttash, State's Atty. and Alfred Wa
Ex Parte Noepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983-03-01 · Published · cited 120× · 646 S.W.2d 230; 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 942
646 S.W.2d 230 (1983) Ex parte Clifford D. NOE. No. 978-82. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. March 1, 1983. Anthony J. Blazi, San Antonio, for appellant. Bill M. White, Dist. Atty., Ed Coffey and James L. Bruner, Asst. Dist. Attys., San Antonio, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., and Alfred Walker, Asst. State's Atty., Austin, for the State. Before the
In re Estate of Noepublic domain
New York Surrogate's Court · 1916-02-15 · Published · cited 3× · 16 Mills Surr. 270; 94 Misc. 63; 157 N.Y.S. 679
Fowler, S.— This is an application by the executors of the estate of Hellie M. Hoe, deceased, under section 2615, Code of Civil Procedure, for a construction of her will. The particular reason which the executors allege in justification of their application is that it is impossible for them to pay any of the general legacies given by the will until it is determined whether such legacies are a charge upon the real estate. Under t
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975-01-27 · Published · cited 74× · 331 A.2d 174; 459 Pa. 641; 1975 Pa. LEXIS 595
459 Pa. 641 (1975) 331 A.2d 174 Rose A. DiFLORIDO v. Noe A. DiFLORIDO, Appellant (two cases). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued November 15, 1974. Decided January 27, 1975. *642 *643 *644 Peter J. Verderame, Langhorne, for appell
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-11-05 · Published · cited 0×
JUDGMENT Court of Appeals First District of Texas NO. 01-14-00027-CV JUAN ALANIZ, ET AL., Appellants1 1 The appellants are: Bernardino Acevedo, Juan A. Alaniz, Rafael Alaniz, Louie Albarado, Walter Albro, Haskell Andrews, Johnny Anazaldua, Jose Manuel Araujo, James D. Archer, Roberto Ovalle Armendariz, Matthew Auguste, David Bachus, Richard
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011-08-18 · Published · cited 7× · 804 F. Supp. 2d 77; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92088; 2011 WL 3628964
804 F.Supp.2d 77 (2011) ONEBEACON AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. COMMERCIAL UNION ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, Defendant. Civil Action No. 10-10164-JLT. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. August 18, 2011. *79 Benjamin L. Hincks, Wynter N. Lavier, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky & Popeo, PC, Boston,
Oliver v. Noepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930-01-14 · Published · cited 14× · 24 S.W.2d 592; 232 Ky. 809; 1930 Ky. LEXIS 81
Reversing. The appellant, W.E. Oliver, sued the appellee, Mrs. Addie C. Noe, and her husband E.D. Noe, on Mrs. Noe's promissory note for $2,000 and interest. An attachment was asked against certain property belonging to her and a lien prayed to be adjudged against the property by reason thereof. Two lienholders were made parties to the suit and called upon to set up their respective claims against this property. Mrs. Noe set up these defenses to the notes, namely: (1) That it wa
Illinois Supreme Court · 2011-05-19 · Published · cited 205× · 950 N.E.2d 1136; 242 Ill. 2d 163; 351 Ill. Dec. 308; 2011 Ill. LEXIS 781
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 165 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 166 Chief Justice Kilbride and Justices Freeman, Thomas, Garman, Karmeier, and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion.</
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2026-04-16 · Published · cited 0× · 2026 Ark. 70
Cite as 2026 Ark. 70 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered April 16, 2026 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2026 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2026 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2026. As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, the clerk of
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-11-05 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued November 5, 2015 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00027-CV ——————————— JUAN ALANIZ, ET AL., Appellants 1 1 The appellants are: Bernardino Acevedo, Juan A. Alaniz, Rafael Alaniz, Lo
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2006-01-30 · Published · cited 4× · 411 F. Supp. 2d 490; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3355; 2006 WL 217935
411 F.Supp.2d 490 (2006) AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Merrell Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Carderm Capital L.P., Plaintiffs, v. BARR LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant. Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merrell Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Carderm Capital L.P., Plaintiffs, v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Defendant. Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AMR Technology, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., Ranbaxy Laboratories Lt
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-06-10 · Published · cited 0×
FILED IN NO. 15-25+00063-cV Se IN THE JUN 1.0 22 FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS ! CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE at Austin JAMES BRICKLEY, Appellant, Vv. CODI MITCHELL, Appellee. Appealed from the 440th Court of Coryell County, Texas APPELLANT'S BRIEF JAMES BRICKLEY Appellant pro se 3201 FM 929 Gatesville, Texas 76597 JAMES BRICKLEY PRO SE APPELLANT REQUESTS ORAL ARGUMENT No. 15-25-00063-CV JAMES BRICKLEY, Appellant, Ve CODI MITCHELL, Appellee. IDENTITY OF PARTIES & COUNSEL Appellant, James
Livingston v. Noepublic domain
Tennessee Supreme Court · 1878-09-15 · Published · cited 0× · 69 Tenn. 55
Cooper, J., delivered the opinion of the court. A preliminary point is presented in this case, that an order was made by the Chancery Court of Grain-ger county, in which the cause was then pending, to transfer the record to the Chancery Court of Hamblen county, a new county, under the 14th section of the act of June, 1870, ch. 6, establishing that county, and under the Code, sec. 84. Both the act and the Code, ho
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1993-02-03 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 06/18/96 OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 93-KA-00215 COA JOHNNY LEE MARSHALL APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED, PURSUANT TO M.R.A.P. 35-B TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ALFRED THAD LEGGETT III COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: PIKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: CHARLES E. MILL
Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951-07-03 · Published · cited 6× · 233 P.2d 724; 171 Kan. 491; 1951 Kan. LEXIS 289
171 Kan. 491 (1951) 233 P.2d 724 THE STATE OF KANSAS, ex rel. HAROLD R. FATZER, Attorney General, Appellant, v. M.R. BARNES, N.C. CARROLL, E. LEE CARROLL, GALE R. CARROLL, HARRY D. BELLAMY, E.G. BELLAMY and FAIRVIEW LAKES CORPORATION, Appellees. No. 38,383 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed July 3, 1951. Warden L. Noe, special assi
Ex Parte Masonpublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983-09-14 · Published · cited 28× · 656 S.W.2d 470; 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1135
656 S.W.2d 470 (1983) Ex parte Jerry Wayne MASON. No. 1038-82. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. September 14, 1983. Donald B. Dailey, Jr., Corpus Christi, for appellant. *471 William B. Mobley, Jr., Dist. Atty., Dan Flynn and Jeffery A. Babcock, Asst. Dist. Attys., Corpus Christi, Robert Huttash, State's Atty. and Alfr
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001-07-17 · Published · cited 48× · 777 A.2d 993; 343 N.J. Super. 73
777 A.2d 993 (2001) 343 N.J. Super. 73 Robert J. TRIFFIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SOMERSET VALLEY BANK, Pavon Flores, Geovany Ayala, Mario Gomes, Marcelina Mejia, George Lopez Martinez, Pedro Lopez, Saul A. Beltran, Noe Cuadra, Marvin O. Rodriges, Defendants, and Hauser Contracting Co., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Automatic Data Processing, Inc., Third-Party Defendant. <
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2016-08-15 · Published · cited 2× · 202 F. Supp. 3d 1223; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107627; 2016 WL 4483867
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Rule 12(c) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, filed May 5, 2016 (Doc. 97)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on August 8, 2016. The primary issues are: (i) whether Plaintiff Michelle Romero, as sister and next friend of Alejandro Romero, Jr., sufficiently states a claim
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986-08-15 · Published · cited 27× · 496 N.E.2d 1024; 147 Ill. App. 3d 76
147 Ill. App.3d 76 (1986) 496 N.E.2d 1024 ALFRED BEHRSTOCK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ACE HOSE AND RUBBER COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 85-2678. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (5th Division). Opinion filed July 3, 1986. Modified on denial of rehearing August 15, 1986. *77