Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Orestes Caridad Alfonso appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition challenging his jury conviction for petty theft with prior convictions, a felony. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2253 and 1291, and we affirm. We previously granted a certificate of appealability (“COA”) on the sole issue of whether the sentence of 25 y

127 F.3d 1096 Dr. Alfonso Rodriquezv.Mr. William Batcheller, Mr. Harold Copeland, Mr. Ed Gentile,Mr. Terry Brittingham, Mr. Earl Petty NO. 97-1410 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Aug 28, 1997 Appeal From: E.D.Pa. ,No.9606809 , Robreno, J.

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge: Alfonso Debose appeals from an opinion and order of the Merit Systems Protection Board issued March 17, 1981 upholding the Department’s action in terminating him for unacceptable performance. We affirm. FACTS: Alfonso Debose, a college-trained agronomist, has been employed by the De

556 F.2d 909 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Marco Alfonso RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 75-1395. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Sept. 16, 1976.On Rehearing July 5, 1977. Frank J. Ragen, Deputy Federal Defender, San Diego, Cal., submitted on briefs for defendant-appellant.

WOOD, Chief Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Calvin Whiting is suffering from a deadly disease: a rare form of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The Mayo Clinic’s website describes this as “a cancer that originates in *665your lymphatic system,” and then spreads throughout the body. See Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, D

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 7, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D19-169 Lower Tribunal No. 13-30460 ________________ The State of Florida,

573 So.2d 1084 (1991) Ernest Raymond McADOO and Alfonso Petti, M.D., Petitioners, v. Gudrun OGDEN and Leadley Ogden, Respondents. No. 90-2142. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. February 13, 1991. John R. Hargrove and Lillian W. Conrad of Heinrich Gordon Batchelder Hargrove Weihe & Gent, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioners. Harry D. Dennis

LOGUE, J. The City of Miami Mayor Tomás Rega-lado ¿ñd City of Miami City Manager Daniel J. Alfonso, nonparties to the underlying personal injury action, have filed a petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of the trial court’s order denying their .motions for protective order and compelling their depositions. We deny the petition. In the underlyin

SHAHOOD, Judge. Appellant, Margaret Beerman, seeks review of a Revised Final Judgment and the denial of her Motion for New Trial after a trial by jury. We hold the trial court did not err with respect to any issue raised by appellant, and accordingly, affirm. This case arises from an automobile accident personal injury case filed by appellant against appellee owner and appellee operator of the other vehic

POOLE, Circuit Judge: Appellants Serafín Alfonso, Humberto Rayo, Fabian Mora and Primo Antonio Serrano-Tellez appeal their convictions of conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Serrano-Tellez a

Re Document Nos.: 3, 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss and Denying as Moot Plaintiff’s • Motion for Summary Judgment RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Yasmin Carty (“Ms. Carty”), sued ' Defendants, CVS Pharmacy, LLC (“CVS

OPINION LAURA CARTER HIGLEY, Justice. Following a joint trial on two separate indictments, a jury found appellant Michael Gregory Petty guilty of two offenses of intoxication manslaughter and further found that he had used a deadly weapon, namely, a motor vehicle, during the commission of each offense. 1

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 8.1100 and 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts II. through XI. OPINION Ramon Alfonso Zanoletti (Alfonso) and his wife Magdalena Rosalis Zanoletti (Magdalena) appeal from the judgments entered upon their convictions by jury of insurance fraud. Specifically, Alfonso was convicted of 19 counts of felony ins

HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Gaspar Esparza-Rodríguez (“Rodriguez”) seeks review of the final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) finding him ineligible for cancellation of removal under § 240A(b)(9)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(C), and deeming him ineligible to be admitted to the United States under § 212(a)(2)(

5 F.3d 543NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Rosa Olivera RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Alfonso RIVERA-FARIAS,

730 F.2d 1009 1 Indiv.Empl.Rts.Cas. 375 Jimmie McBEE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.JIM HOGG COUNTY, TEXAS and Gilbert Ybanez, Defendants-Appellants.Javier Alfonso HINOJOSA, et al., Plaintiffs,v.JIM HOGG COUNTY, TEXAS, et al., Defendants. No. 81-2465. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. April 30, 1984.

MEMORANDUM OPINION EMMET G. SULLIVAN, United States District Judge Brandy McGinnis brings this action against the District of Columbia (“the District”) and four employees of the Metropolitan Police Department (“the MPD”). Ms. McGinnis claims that her constitutionally protected liberty interest was violated when she was falsely accused of having

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge Plaintiff Alfred M. Winder is a former employee of the District of Columbia’s Division of Transportation of the D.C. Public Schools (“DCPS”). He brought this action against defendants the District of Columbia and DCPS official Louis Erste (collectively “the District”). After over a

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 8.1100 and 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts II. through XI. [EDITORS' NOTE: TEXT NOT CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION APPEARS WITH GRAY BACKGROUND BELOW.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 5

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PAN AM DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES, INC. d/b/a PAN AM DIAGNOSTIC OF ORLANDO a/a/o CLAUDINE JEAN, Appellee. No. 4D21-2156 [August 17, 2022] Appeal from the County Court for