Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Alfi, Inc.”
Genesis Insurance v. Alfipublic domain
425 F.Supp.2d 876 (2006) GENESIS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Ahmed O. ALFI, et al., Defendants. No. 2:05-CV-0401. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 23, 2006. *877 *878 Robert H. Nichols, Jeremy M. Grayem, Schottenstein Zox & Dunn, Columbus, OH, Peter R.
589 F.3d 1179 (2009) INTELLECTUAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and US JVC Corporation, JVC Americas Corporation, and Panasonic Corporation of North America, Defendants. No. 2009-1142. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 15, 2009. *1180
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED THE ALFI A. SHAHID AND PATRICIA ALLAN-SHAHID FAMILY TRUST, U/T/ D NOVEMBER 24, 2000, Appellant, Case No. 5D22-25 v. LT Case No. 2020-CC-04
Alfie's Original Souliers, Inc. v. Phoenix Assurancepublic domain
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered October 18, 1996, which, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendant Phoenix Assurance Company of New York for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Defendant’s submission of evidence of the underwriting practices it followed two years after it accepted plaintiffs application for insurance, coupled with conclusory deposi
Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #442] ARTERTON, District Judge. The Court granted summary judgment of non-infringement in favor of Sony and other television manufacturers (“the Non-Soundview Parties”), concluding that there was no genuine issue of material fact for trial and the Non-Soundview Parties were entitled to judgment as a matter of law on their assertion that the parental con
124 F.Supp.2d 527 (2000) In re SMARTALK TELESERVICES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: All Actions Particularly USDC S.D. Ohio Case No. C2-98-814 No. 00-1315. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. November 1, 2000. *528 *529 *
124 F.Supp.2d 505 (2000) In re SMARTALK TELESERVICES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: All Actions Particularly: USDC Massachusetts Case No.: 99CVH11499EFH (5S Trust I) 99 CVH11662EFH (Grillo) USDC S.D. Ohio Case No.: C2-98-814 No. 00-1315. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. November 1, 2000.
Ludahl v. Seaview Boat Yard, Inc.public domain
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT DIMMICK, Chief Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on defendants’ motion for a partial judgment on the pleadings. Specifically, defendant asks for an order granting a judgment on the pleadings on plaintiffs’ claims for (1) lost earnings (encompassing loss of earning capacity, loss of inheritance, and loss of accumulation of estate), and (2)
854 A.2d 378 (2004) 181 N.J. 245 AUTO LENDERS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. GENTILINI FORD, INC., Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PNC Bank National Association, John Does 1-10, Randy Carpenter, Richard Baker, Shawn Hamilton, Shanda Boddie, Sean Murray, Thomas Eidell, Christopher Jackson, Tamika Fortune, Starr Barnum, Cassandra Brock, Latoya Savage, Kenyatta Saunders, Kenneth Graham, Cornei
Stokes v. Golden Triangle, Inc.public domain
JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Gregory Stokes (Stokes) appeals from an order issued by the Eighth Judicial District Comí;, Cascade County, granting summary judgment in favor of Golden Triangle, Inc. (Golden Triangle). After recovering workers’ compensation insurance benefits in the amount of $
Stonefire Grill, Inc. v. FGF Brands, Inc.public domain
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JESUS G. BERNAL, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant FGF Brands, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (“Motion,” Doc. No. 71.) After considering the papers timely filed and the arguments presented at the July 29, 2013 hearing, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural
35 So.3d 301 (2010) Ali FINI d/b/a LA Tiger Express v. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD FOR the CITY OF BATON ROUGE and Parish of East Baton Rouge. No. 2009 CA 0854. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. February 10, 2010. *302 Thomas M. Lockwood, A. Gregory Rome, Lockwood & Rome, L.L.C., Baton Rouge, LA, for Appellee,
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Peters v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel., Fla.1954, 70 So.2d 547; Green v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel., Fla.App.1966, 192 So.2d 310; Ames v. Ames, Fla.App. 1963, 153 So.2d 737; Goldstein v. Pettinger, Fla.App. 1966, 183 So.2d 740.
Bade, D. v. Picone, R.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT DEREK BADE : No. 265 MAL 2016 : v. : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court ROBERTO PICONE I/T/A LA DOLCE : CASA T/A DIMAGGIO'S; CESARE : PICONE I/T/A LA DOLCE CASA T/A : DIMAGGIO'S
124 F.Supp.2d 487 (2000) In re SMARTALK TELESERVICES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: All Actions Particularly USDC Massachusetts Case Nos.: 99CVH11499EFH (5S Trust I). No. 00-1315. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. November 1, 2000. *488 *489 Greg Ma
In re Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. Securities Litigationpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs Omnibus Motion of (i) Leave to Amend the Consolidated Class Action Complaint and (ii) For Reconsideration of the Court’s January 27, 2010 Memorandum Opinion and Orders Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant’s Motions to Dismiss the Consolidated Amende
in Re Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc.public domain
FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, NO. CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TE
NUMBER 13-20-00466-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG JOHN LANDER, Appellant, v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS CWABS, INC. ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-23 Appe
Bade v. Piconepublic domain
*476ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 8th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Adlowance of Appeal is DENIED.
Earth Protector, Inc. v. Jacobspublic domain
993 F.Supp. 701 (1998) EARTH PROTECTOR, INC., Plaintiff, v. Robert T. JACOBS, in his official capacity as Regional Forester, United States Forest Service; James Sanders, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor, Superior National Forest, United States Forest Service; and Constance Chaney, in her official capacity as District Ranger, Superior National Forest, United States Forest Service; Cusson Camp Company, Defendants, and Minnesota