Cases

925 A.2d 22 (2007) 393 N.J. Super. 560 John L. ALFANO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BDO SEIDMAN, LLP, Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, LLP, f/k/a Brown & Wood, LLP, R.J. Ruble, Presidio Advisors, LLC, Presidio Growth, LLC, John Larson, Defendants, and Deutsche Bank AG, Defendant-Appellant. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued March 13, 2007.

memorandum and order JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge. Plaintiff Jonel Barbu (“plaintiff’) brings this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), challenging the termination of his long-term disability benefits, which were paid for approximately 17 months until defendant Life Insurance Company of North America (“defendant” or “LINA”) determined that plaintiff was no longer di

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR., District Judge. Pending before the Court is the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) action concerning the termination of Plaintiff Kanika Bledsoe’s (“Plaintiff’) long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B). (See Complaint, Dkt. No. 1.) Plaintiff seeks reinstatement of the LTD benefits u

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MATSUMOTO, District Judge. On April 30, 2010, plaintiff Stephen J. Topalian (“plaintiff’ or “Topalian”), a former employee of Alstate Insurance Com*299pany (“Allstate”), commenced this action against Hartford Life Insurance Company (“defendant” or “Hartford”), pursuant to § 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Sec

OPINION D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge: Avery Armani (Armani) appeals the district court’s judgment denying him benefits under his long term disability policy sponsored by his employer and issued by Appellee Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company (Northwestern Mutual). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we VACATE the part of

MEMORANDUM — DECISION and ORDER NEAL P. McCURN, Senior District Judge. I. Introduction Presently before the court in this ERISA action are cross motions for summary judgment. The motions, which have been fully briefed, are decided on the submitted papers without oral argument. Plaintiff, Curt A. Wykstra, brings this action against defend

769 F.Supp.2d 530 (2011) Carolyn TAAFFE, Plaintiff, v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Defendant. No. 09 Civ. 6710(FM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 23, 2011. *533 Scott Madison Riemer, Riemer & Associates, L.L.C., New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Emily Anna Hayes, Fred N. Knopf, Wilson, E

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. The Plaintiff Susan Rozek (“the Plaintiff’) brings this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., against the Defendants New York Blood Center (“NYBC”), NYBC in its capacity as Plan Administrator of NYBC, and First Unum Life Insurance Company (“First Unum,” and collectively, “the Defendants”). She a

740 F.Supp.2d 397 (2010) Kelvin VANWRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. 09 Civ. 1186 (VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 26, 2010. *400 Robert Elliot Grey, Ronald Lee Epstein, Grey & Grey, LLP, Farmingdale, NY, for Plaintiff. Patrick Walter Begos, Begos and Horgan

MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER LAWRENCE E. KAHN, Senior District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Paul J. Rood (“Plaintiff’) commenced this action on April 19, 2013, alleging a claim for disability pension benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. Dkt. No. 1 (“Complaint”). Plaintiffs Complaint names the New York State Teamst

757 F.Supp.2d 199 (2010) Loleta GRIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK STATE NURSES ASSOCIATION PENSION PLAN AND BENEFITS FUND, Nancy Kaleda, Elliott Kellman, Anne Tahaney, Kenneth Krugar, Charyea Wegee, Marc J. Leff, Ann Parish, Bart Metzger, Joseph Cabral, Fred Eisgrub, and G. Thomas Ferguson, Defendants. No. 10-CV-824 (JFB)(WDW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. Decembe

664 F.Supp.2d 962 (2009) Karen R. ROSBY, Plaintiff, v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant. No. 4:08CV04108 JLH. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division. October 7, 2009. *964 Leon Marks, Attorney at Law, Little Rock, AR, for Plaintiff. David M. Donovan, Watts, Donovan & Tilley, P.A.

OPINION & ORDER HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Plaintiff, Sherry F. Robertson, seeks legal and equitable ' damages from Defendant, Standard Insurance Company, under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Plaintiff received long-term- disability (LTD) insurance benefits and a waiver-of-premium of a life insurance policy benefit from Defendant from

690 F.Supp.2d 917 (2010) Nancy PERRYMAN, Plaintiff, v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. CV-01-0927-PHX-PGR. United States District Court, D. Arizona. February 18, 2010. Order Denying Partial Reconsideration March 30, 2010. *920 Richard Walter Langerman, Law Offices of Richard Langerma

647 F.Supp.2d 296 (2009) DOYNOW SALES ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff, v. ROCHEUX INTERNATIONAL OF NEW JERSEY, INC. a/k/a Rocheux International, Inc., Defendant. No. 08 Civ. 8043 (AJP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 24, 2009. *298 Scott Anthony Lucas, Scott A. Lucas, Esq., Steven Mitchell Sack, Law Office of Sco

OPINION & ORDER ANDREW J. PECK, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company and Hayden Building Maintenance Corporation bring this diversity action against defendant Century Surety Company seeking a declaratory judgment that Century is obligated to defend and indemnify Hayden in an underlying state court action. (Dkt. No. 15: Am. Compl. ¶¶ 24-36

637 F.Supp.2d 132 (2009) Diane S. FORTUNE, Plaintiff, v. GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF KEYSPAN CORPORATION, Hartford Life Insurance Company, Oxford Health Plans, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendants. No. 08-CV-1017 (ADS)(ETB). United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 25, 2009. *135 The ERISA

HAIGHT, Senior District Judge: This is an ERISA action. Plaintiff Amy Benjamin sued Defendant Oxford Health Insurance, Inc. ("Oxford") for denying coverage of Benjamin's residential treatment for a mental and/or behavioral health disorder. Benjamin asserted in her complaint that Oxford's denial of coverage was wrongful because she was entitled to coverage for the care received under the terms of her ERISA-governed policy issued by O

785 F.Supp.2d 317 (2011) Susan Amy SCHLENGER, Plaintiff, v. FIDELITY EMPLOYER SERVICES COMPANY, LLC, IBM Corporation, and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendants. No. 09-CV-3986 (CS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 31, 2011. *321 Nicole B. Albano, Lowenstein Sandler, PC, Roseland, NJ, for Plaintiff.

VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge Plaintiff David Cohen ("Plaintiff") brings this action, pursuant to § 502(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA") against Defendants Liberty Mutual Group Inc. Executive Partnership Deferred Compensation Plan ("EPDCP") and Liberty Mutual Group Inc. 2012 Executive Partnership Plan ("EPP" and, collectively, "Defendants" or the "Plans"), seeking review o