Cases

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW E. CLIFTON KNOWLES, United States Magistrate Judge. I. Introduction and Background The Court tried this case with the consent of the parties and without a jury on *603October 24-25, 2012. ■ This action involves a claim brought by Petitioner Nora Lizeth Saavedra Aranda

765 A.2d 1226 (2001) BRADFORD DYEING ASSOCIATION, INC. v. J. STOG TECH GMBH. No. 99-440-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. February 14, 2001. *1227 Present: WEISBERGER, C.J., LEDERBERG, BOURCIER, FLANDERS, and GOLDBERG, JJ. Gerald John Petros, Alexandra K. Callam, Providence, for plaintiff. James E. Purcell, Mel

—In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to determine title to real property, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.), dated May 3, 2000, which denied their motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to the properties located at 71-03 and 71-05 31st Avenue in Queens, on the ground of collateral estoppel. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The d

CALLOWAY, J., Ad Hoc. 11 Following a jury trial, the defendant, Marion Dale Jones, was convicted of aggravated rape. He was sentenced to life imprisonment at hard labor, without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On July 1, 2007, at approximately 1:30 a.m., lí-year-old R.W.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 860 Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion. Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ.

DAVID O. CARTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Plaintiff Allergan USA, Inc.'s ("Plaintiff" or "Allergan") Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and for Summary Judgment ("Allergan Motion") (Dkt. 94) and Defendants Prescriber's Choice, Inc. ("Prescriber's Choice") and Sincerus Florida, LLC's ("Sincerus" and together with Prescriber's Choice, "Defendants") Motion for Partial Summary Judgment ("Defs. Mot.") (Dkt. 88).

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, Otis Elevator Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.), dated July 1, 1994, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it, and for the imposition of costs against the plaintiff. Ordered that the order is modified by deleting therefrom the

OPINION VANASKIE, Circuit Judge. Appellant Jeffrey Heffernan, a police officer in Paterson, New Jersey, was demoted after being observed obtaining a local mayoral candidate’s campaign sign at the request of his mother. He brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Appellees, including the City of Paterson, then-Mayor Jose Torres, Police Chief Jam

Froessel, J. (concurring). I agree with the result arrived at in Judge Burke’s opinion, but am of the opinion that we do reach the question of improper delegation of judicial power. How can we say there is a waiver of a right unless we declare the right? Or, to put it conversely, if no right has been violated, there is simply nothing to waive. Permitting clerks in Surrogates’ Courts to take testimony in cont

Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge THIS MATTER came on for trial on January 9, 2018, before the Court, sitting without a jury. Seattle Times Company ("Seattle Times") was represented by Jeff Kray and Jessica Ferrell of Marten Law PLLC. LeatherCare, Inc. ("LeatherCare"), Steven Ritt, and the marital community composed of Steven Ritt and Laurie Rosen-Ritt were represented by Jo Flannery and Kristin Meier of Ryan, Swanson &a;

OPINION OF THE COURT JORDAN, Circuit Judge. Stanley Sanders was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania of two counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). He timely filed the present appeal, challenging, first, the District Court’s denial of his pretrial motion to suppress out-of-court identifications made pursuant to an allegedly suggestive phot

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2016 MSPB 2 Docket No. DC-0752-16-0278-I-1 Naval Station Norfolk – Hearing 2, Appellants, v. Department of the Navy, Agency.

410 Mass. 15 (1991) 570 N.E.2d 1008 ALPHONSUS E. McCARTHY, JR. vs. LITTON INDUSTRIES, INC. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Plymouth. January 7, 1991. May 7, 1991. Present: LIACOS, C.J., WILKINS, ABRAMS, NOLAN, LYNCH, O'CONNOR & GREANEY, JJ. *16 John J. McGivney (Christopher A.

Opinion Timothy C. Stanceu, Chief Judge In this consolidated action, plaintiffs Pa-pierfabrik August Koehler AG (“Koehler”) and Appleton Papers, Inc. contested the amended final results issued by the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or the ^Department”) to conclude the second administrative review (“AR2”) of

OPINION McNULTY, District Judge: The plaintiff, Jeffrey Heffernan, a veteran police officer in the City of Paterson, was demoted following a report that he had picked up a lawn sign from a campaign worker for a mayoral candidate. Heffernan has made a number of claims, but the one that best fits the evidence is that the Defendants,1 his employers, believed Heffernan had engaged in

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN A. GIBNEY, JR., District Judge. The essence of this case is a familiar one: a business deal soured by funding problems during an economic recession. At its inception, the deal was marked by optimism and cooperation between the parties. Negotiations culminated in the Contractor Confidentiality, Invention Rights, Exclusivity and Non-Compete Agreement (the “Invention Rights

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 27, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CT-00740-SCT JEFFREY CLYDE PITTS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/11/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JOHN H. EMFINGER TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: J. EDWARD RAINER KIMBERLY M. PHILLIPS

Slip Op. 23-139 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE SECOND NATURE DESIGNS LTD., Plaintiff, Before: Gary S. Katzmann, Judge v. Court No. 17-00271 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION [ Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in

MEMORANDUM OPINION EATON, Judge: Before the court is the motion for a preliminary injunction of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the Industrial Division of the Communication Workers of America, and Five Rivers Electronics Innovations, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) seeking to enjoin liquidation of certain entries of color television receiv